Confusion between the real CROWN and the apparent crown
by Mark Owen
29 August 2007
There are two Crowns operant in England, one being Queen Elizabeth II.
Although extremely wealthy, the Queen functions largely in a ceremonial
capacity and serves to deflect attention away from the other Crown, who
issues her marching orders through their control of the English Parliament.
This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the
Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the
677-acre, independent sovereign state know as The City of London, or
simply 'The City.'
The City is not a part of England, just as Washington is not a part of
the USA. The City is referred to as the wealthiest square mile on
earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor who is appointed annually. When
the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the
Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to
enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City
walking several paces behind the Mayor. Her entourage may not be clothed
in anything other than service uniforms.
In the nineteenth century, 90% of the world's trade was carried by
British ships controlled by the Crown. The other 10% of ships had to
pay commissions to the Crown simply for the privilege of using the
The Crown reaped billions in profits while operating under the
protection of the British armed forces. This was not British commerce
or British wealth, but the Crown's commerce and the Crown's wealth. As
of 1850, author Frederick Morton estimated the Rothschild fortune to be in
excess of $10 billion [today, the combined wealth of the banking dynasties
is $300 trillion]. Today, the bonded indebtedness of the world is
held by the Crown.
The aforementioned Temple Bar is the juristic arm of the Crown and
holds an exclusive monopoly on global legal fraud through their Bar
Association franchises. The Temple Bar is comprised of four Inns of
Court. They are; the Middle Temple, Inner Temple, Lincoln's Inn and
Gray's Inn. The entry point to these closed secret societies is only to
be found when one is called to their Bar.
The Bar attorneys in the United States owe their allegiance and pledge
their oaths to the Crown. All Bar Associations throughout the world
are signatories and franchises to the International Bar Association
located at the Inns of Court of the Crown Temple.
The Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by license that
bleeds Canada and Great Britain white, while the Middle Temple has
license to steal from America.
To have the Declaration of Independence recognized internationally,
Middle Templar King George III agreed in the Treaty of Paris of 1783
to establish the legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States,
referred to internally as the Crown Temple States (Colonies). States
spelled with a capital letter 'S,' denotes a legal entity of the Crown.
At least five Templar Bar Attorneys under solemn oath to the Crown,
signed the American Declaration of Independence. This means that both
parties were agents of the Crown. There is no lawful effect when a party
signs as both the first and second parties. The Declaration was simply
an internal memo circulating among private members of the Crown.
Most Americans believe that they own their own land, but they have
merely purchased real estate by contract. Upon fulfillment of the
contract, control of the land is transferred by Warranty Deed. The
Warranty Deed is only a 'color of title.' Color of Title is a semblance
or appearance of title, but not title in fact or in law. The Warranty
Deed cannot stand against the Land Patent.
The Crown was granted Land Patents in North America by the King of
England. Colonials rebelled at the usurious Crown taxes, and thus the
Declaration of Independence was created to pacify the poplulace.
Another ruse used to hoodwink natural persons is by enfranchisement.
Those cards in your wallet bearing your name spelled in all capital
letters means that you have been enfranchised and have the status of a
corporation. A 'juristic personality' has been created, and you have
entered into multi-variant agreements that place you in an equity
relationship with the Crown.
These invisible contracts include, birth certificates, citizenship
records, employment agreements, driver's licenses and bank accounts.
It is perhaps helpful to note here that contracts do not now, nor have
they ever had to be stated in writing in order to be enforceable by
American judges. If it is written down, it is merely a written
statement of the contract.
Tax protestors and (the coming) draft resistors trying to renounce the
parts of these contracts that they now disagree with will not profit
by resorting to tort law (fairness) arguments as justification. Judges
will reject these lines of defense as they have no bearing on contract
law jurisprudence. Tort law governs grievances where no contract law is in
These private agreements/contracts that bind us will always overrule
the broad general clauses of the Constitution and Bill of Rights (the
Constitution being essentially a renamed enactment of English common
law). The Bill of Rights is viewed by the Crown as a 'bill of benefits,'
conferred on us by them in anticipation of reciprocity (taxes).
Protestors and resistors will also lose their cases by boasting of
citizenship status. Citizenship is another equity agreement that we
have with the Crown. And this is the very juristic contract that Federal
judges will use to incarcerate them. In the words of former Supreme
Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, "Equity is brutal, but we are merely
enforcing agreements." The balance of Title 42, section 1981 of the
Civil Rights Code states, " .citizens shall be subject to like
punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every
What we view as citizenship, the Crown views as a juristic enrichment
instrumentality. It also should be borne in mind that even cursory
circulation or commercial use of Federal Reserve Notes effects an
attachment of liability for the payment of the Crown's debt to the FED.
This is measured by your taxable income.
And to facilitate future asset-stripping, the end of the 14th
amendment includes a state of debt hypothecation of the United States,
wherein all enfranchised persons (that's you) can be held personally liable
for the Crown's debt.
The Crown views our participation in these contracts of commercial
equity as being voluntary and that any gain accrued is taxable, as the
gain wouldn't have been possible were in not for the Crown. They view
the system of interstate banks as their own property. Any profit or gain
experienced by anyone with a bank account (or loan, mortgage or credit
card) carries with it - as an operation of law - the identical same full
force and effect as if the Crown had created the gain.
Bank accounts fall outside the umbrella of Fourth Amendment protection
because a commercial contract is in effect and the Bill of Rights cannot
be held to interfere with the execution of commercial contracts. The
Crown also views bank account records as their own private property,
pursuant to the bank contract that each of us signed and that none of us
The rare individual who actually reads the bank contract will find
that they agreed to be bound by Title 26 and under section 7202 agreed not
to disseminate any fraudulent tax advice. This written contract with the
Crown also acknowledges that bank notes are taxable instruments of
When we initially opened a bank account, another juristic personality
was created. It is this personality (income and assets) that IRS
agents are excising back to the Crown through taxation.
A lot of ink is being spilled currently over Social Security.
Possession of a Social Security Number is known in the Crown's lex as
'conclusive evidence' of our having accepted federal commercial
benefits. This is another example of an equity relationship with the
Crown. Presenting one's Social Security Number to an employer seals our
status as taxpayers, and gives rise to liability for a reciprocal quid
pro quo payment of taxes to the Crown.
Through the Social Security Number we are accepting future retirement
endowment benefits. Social Security is a strange animal. If you die,
your spouse gets nothing, but rather, what would have gone to you is
divided (forfeited) among other premium payers who haven't died yet.
But the Crown views failure to reciprocate in any of these equity
attachments as an act of defilement and will proceed against us with
all due prejudice.
For a person to escape the tentacles of the Crown octopus, a thorough
going study of American jurisprudence is required. One would have to be
deemed a 'stranger to the public trust,' forfeit all enfranchisement
benefits and close all bank accounts, among other things. Citizenship
would have to be made null and forfeit and the status of 'denizen'
enacted. If there are any persons extant who have passed through this
fire, I would certainly appreciate hearing from them
Legal System vs Law System
[Authored by Jim Townsend]
29 August 2007
Here is how the scam works. In the City of London, there are four Inns of Court. These Inns are private country clubs of the rich and have been around for 1000 years, so they certainly have perfected their techniques.
Their trade is deceit. There is a difference between 'lawful' and 'legal'. Lawful contemplates the spirit of the law and is embodied in the moral and ethical consideration of rendering unto each man his due. Legal is the 'form of the law' and merely means that it is written down someplace. It is quite possible for something to be "legal" and still be totally unlawful.
These Inns of Court are a private enterprise. The main players are made up of the Knights of the Garter and the Queen and Queen Mother themselves are members of both the Inner and Middle Temple. You can read about their history at http://www.innertemplelibrary.org.uk and you will find the 'legal rules and regulations' for your country posted here. Your countries legal system is owned by the same court that owns Ireland. These Inns of Court make a living by usurping the 'laws of the land' and replacing them with the "legal system / administration / pirate 'laws' of the high seas." These pirates should be flying the skull and crossbones, not the flag of the US. Hey, now that I think about it, don't a few of your presidents belong to a Skulls Club? In other words, these people pretend that they are applying laws, when they are really using their unlawful legal system to usurp the laws of the land. Americans generally think they won the war against the British. In actual fact, they lost it in their courts.
Look back into the middle ages at pictures of Justice. She is a buxom blonde with the most beautiful bright blue eyes. So now you know who tied the rag around her head and left her sitting blind folded on the steps of the court house. Of course, these people are ever so much more intelligent than us that they flaunt their symbols in our face and laugh at our stupidity. Would you give someone a sword and then blindfold them? Of course not, but the people behind all this have no problem blindfolding or 'hoodwinking' our young men and sending them off to battle where their efforts will do nothing more than entrench us ever deeper into their system of deceit.
The Bar Associations of both Canada and the US and many other countries are nothing more than these 'Legal System' franchises. Look carefully and you will see that every time your country has been sold down the river, it has been by the members of this franchise. These franchised lawyers quite literally have 'legal licenses to steal,' and steal they do. Now you know why your own Constitution has no bearing when you are in a 'legal court.' Were you in a lawful court where the 'law of the land' was being upheld, you would have a fighting chance, but as it is, when we go into court we are in a game called shooting fish in a barrel.
Their is only one way you get a KBE and that is through SERVICES RENDERED to the British 'Crown.' The 'Crown' is not the Queen by the way, but refers to the 'Crown in Chancery,' a legislative authority of Bankers and Lawyers from Chancery Lane which backs off Fleet Street. Now ask yourself what service did Giuliani render to get his knighthood? Even a better one; what service did George Bush render to become a Knight of the British Crown? A Knight swears allegiance to her Majesty when he is knighted. Doesn't it bother you guys that you have people in positions of power that have sworn allegiance to a foreign power?
Interestingly, in 1387, there was a 'peasants rebellion' in England and all the Lawyers, Judiciary and members of these Inns had their throats slit, which was quite an apt punishment for these treasonous little traitors. You can read about this uprising in the excellent book entitled "Born in Blood." Fact of the matter is that every member of the Bar Association is guilty of treason, for they have subverted the 'laws of the land.'
The legal systems of both our countries are fronted out of England. The banking systems of both our countries are fronted out of Belgium. And both of them are financially controlled lock stock and barrel by Switzerland, you know; the home of the UN, IMF, WTO, and Bank of International Settlements which controls the 'Bank of Canada' and the 'Federal Reserve' in the US. Ever wonder why Switzerland was neutral and Heir Hitler even respected their 'neutrality' while he bombed literally every other country around him? Of course, you don't bomb your banker now do you?
By the way, the bombing run over Afghanistan is just so they can build a pipeline to get the oil to a sea port in Pakistan. Don't expect the oil cartels to thank you for your childrens blood to clear the way for them to build it though.
Groundbreaking Negligence Case
The cafe in Paisley that served the infamous ginger
beer(Major legal case)
27 August 2007
Seventy-five years ago this week May Donoghue
discovered what she claimed was a decomposing snail in
the ginger beer bought for her by a friend in a small
café in Paisley. Her claim for the resulting shock and
illness turned into one of the most famous legal cases
of all time, establishing the principal of
manufacturer's liability and setting the stage for the
development of the law of negligence throughout the
common law world. Samantha McAlister speaks to Tony
Lambie, the grandson of the solicitor who represented
Mrs Donoghue. Marcel Berlins then asks the Chief
Executive of the Law Society of Scotland, Douglas
Mill, to explain his particular passion for the case.
from about 20 minutes including comment from Mill on this major legal case.
Is chlorinated water killing us?
The rise of a Asthma in the UK has NEVER been fully explained.Chlorine has been added to our water in ever increasing quantities due to poor maintenance in our water system leading to increases in bacteria levels.Chlorine is supposed to kill the bacteria but what is it actually doing to our insides?
20 August 2007
The fine mucus that allows our lungs to breath is one of the most delicate structures in the body allowing oxygen to enter the blood stream while stopping the blood from seeping out into our lung cavities.
The effects of Chlorine have been well researched as a weapon of war.
There is also a new phenomena only recently discovered concerning swimming pool attendants and a condition of the lung caused by urine getting into pool water causing chlorine gas to be created from mixing with chlorinated pool water.
Can we really trust those in power to protect our lives and use products that wont damage our health?
Read the horrible effects of Hitler's use of chlorine gas against enemy troops.
One good reason for sticking to bottled water
The German Army first used chlorine gas cylinders in April 1915 against the French Army at Ypres. French soldiers reported seeing yellow-green clouds drifting slowly towards the Allied trenches. They also noticed its distinctive smell which was like a mixture of pineapple and pepper. At first the French officers assumed that the German infantry were advancing behind a smoke screen and orders were given to prepare for an armed attack. When the gas arrived at the Allied front-trenches soldiers began to complain about pains in the chests and a burning sensation in their throats.
Most soldiers now realised they were being gassed and many ran as fast as they could away from the scene. An hour after the attack had started there was a four-mile gap in the Allied line. As the German soldiers were concerned about what the chlorine gas would do to them, they hesitated about moving forward in large numbers. This delayed attack enabled Canadian and British troops to retake the position before the Germans burst through the gap that the chlorine gas had created.
Chlorine gas destroyed the respiratory organs of its victims and this led to a slow death by asphyxiation. One nurse described the death of one soldier who had been in the trenches during a chlorine gas attack. “He was sitting on the bed, fighting for breath, his lips plum coloured. He was a magnificent young Canadian past all hope in the asphyxia of chlorine. I shall never forget the look in his eyes as he turned to me and gasped: I can’t die! Is it possible that nothing can be done for me?” It was a horrible death, but as hard as they tried, doctors were unable to find a way of successfully treating chlorine gas poisoning.
It was important to have the right weather conditions before a gas attack could be made. When the British Army launched a gas attack on 25th September in 1915, the wind blew it back into the faces of the advancing troops. This problem was solved in 1916 when gas shells were produced for use with heavy artillery. This increased the army's range of attack and helped to protect their own troops when weather conditions were not completely ideal.
After the first German chlorine gas attacks, Allied troops were supplied with masks of cotton pads that had been soaked in urine. It was found that the ammonia in the pad neutralized the chlorine. These pads were held over the face until the soldiers could escape from the poisonous fumes. Other soldiers preferred to use handkerchiefs, a sock, a flannel body-belt, dampened with a solution of bicarbonate of soda, and tied across the mouth and nose until the gas passed over. Soldiers found it difficult to fight like this and attempts were made to develop a better means of protecting men against gas attacks. By July 1915 soldiers were given efficient gas masks and anti-asphyxiation respirators.
One disadvantage for the side that launched chlorine gas attacks was that it made the victim cough and therefore limited his intake of the poison. Both sides found that phosgene was more effective than chlorine. Only a small amount was needed to make it impossible for the soldier to keep fighting. It also killed its victim within 48 hours of the attack. Advancing armies also used a mixture of chlorine and phosgene called 'white star'.