Murdoch moll and henchman go on trial VIDEO
Jews DO control the media and they admit it
We Jews are a funny breed. We love to brag about every Jewish actor. Sometimes we even pretend an actor is Jewish just because we like him enough that we think he deserves to be on our team. We brag about Jewish authors, Jewish politicians, Jewish directors. Every time someone mentions any movie or book or piece of art, we inevitably say something like, “Did you know that he was Jewish?” That’s just how we roll.

We’re a driven group, and not just in regards to the art world. We have, for example, AIPAC, which was essentially constructed just to drive agenda in Washington DC. And it succeeds admirably. And we brag about it. Again, it’s just what we do. But the funny part is when any anti-Semite or anti-Israel person starts to spout stuff like, “The Jews control the media!” and “The Jews control Washington!” Suddenly we’re up in arms. We create huge campaigns to take these people down. We do what we can to put them out of work. We publish articles. We’ve created entire organizations that exist just to tell everyone that the Jews don’t control nothin’. No, we don’t control the media, we don’t have any more sway in DC than anyone else. No, no, no, we swear: We’re just like everybody else!

Does anyone else (who’s not a bigot) see the irony of this? Let’s be honest with ourselves, here, fellow Jews. We do control the media. We’ve got so many dudes up in the executive offices in all the big movie production companies it’s almost obscene. Just about every movie or TV show, whether it be “Tropic Thunder” or “Curb Your Enthusiasm,” is rife with actors, directors, and writers who are Jewish. Did you know that all eight major film studios are run by Jews? But that’s not all. We also control the ads that go on those TV shows.

And let’s not forget AIPAC, every anti-Semite’s favorite punching bag. We’re talking an organization that’s practically the equivalent of the Elders of Zion. I’ll never forget when I was involved in Israeli advocacy in college and being at one of the many AIPAC conventions. A man literally stood in front of us and told us that their whole goal was to only work with top-50 school graduate students because they would eventually be the people making changes in the government. Here I am, an idealistic little kid that goes to a bottom 50 school (ASU) who wants to do some grassroots advocacy, and these guys are literally talking about infiltrating the government. Intense. Now, I know what everyone will say. That everyone tries to lobby. Every minority group and every majority group. That every group has some successful actors and directors. But that’s a far call from saying that we run Hollywood and Madison Avenue. That the Mel Gibsons of the world are right in saying we’re deliberately using our power to take over the world. That we’ve got some crazy conspiracy going down. Okay. Fine. So some of that is kooky talk. But let’s look at it a bit deeper.

Maybe it’s true: everyone lobbies. Maybe it’s true there are actors of every ethnicity out there. But come on. We’re the ones who are bragging about this stuff all the time. Can’t we admit that we’re incredibly successful? Can’t we say it to the world? I’ll give my theory for why Jews don’t want to talk about their control of the media. First of all, as much as Jews like to admit that so many of them are successful, and that so many of them have accomplished so much, they hate to admit that it has to do with they’re being Jewish. Maybe they’ll admit that it has something to do with the Jewish experience. But how many Jews will admit that there is something inherently a part of every single one of them that helps them to accomplish amazing things?

The ADL chairman, Abe Foxman, was interviewed in a great article about the subject and he said that he “would prefer people say that many executives in the industry ‘happen to be Jewish.’” This just about sums up the party line. The truth is, the anti-Semites got it right. We Jews have something planted in each one of us that makes us completely different from every group in the world. We’re talking about a group of people that just got put in death camps, endured pogroms, their whole families decimated. And then they came to America, the one place that ever really let them have as much power as they wanted, and suddenly they’re taking over. Please don’t tell me that any other group in the world has ever done that. Only the Jews. And we’ve done it before. That’s why the Jews were enslaved in Egypt. We were too successful. Go look at the Torah — it’s right there. And we did it in Germany too. This ability to succeed, this inner drive, comes not from the years of education or any other sort of conditional factors, but because of the inner spark within each Jew.

Now, the reason groups like the ADL and AIPAC hate admitting this is because, first of all, they are secular organizations. Their whole agenda is to prove that every Jew is the same as every other person in the world. I cannot imagine a more outlandish agenda. No, we’re different. We’re special. Of course, people hate when anyone says this. They assume that if you’re saying that Jews are special, it somehow implies that they’re better. To be honest, I’m not really sure what the word “better” even means. What I do know is that being special simply means a person has a responsibility to do good.

I think that’s the real reason most Jews are so afraid to admit that there’s something inherently powerful and good about them. Not because they’re afraid of being special. But because they’re afraid of being responsible. It means that they’re suddenly culpable when they create dirty TV shows that sully the spiritual atmosphere of the world. It means that things can’t just be created for the sake of amusement or fun or even “art.” Suddenly, we can’t screw up the world. The interesting thing is that Jews have done so much for the world in so many other ways. They’ve moved forward civil rights; they’ve helped save lives in Darfur, Haiti and just about everywhere else. But that’s not enough. Fixing the world physically is only half the battle.

Our larger battle, the harder battle, is elevating the world spiritually. And this is what the people that fight with every inch of their soul to prove that Jews are just the same as everyone else are afraid of. It means that we can no longer just “express ourselves.” We’ll have to start thinking about the things we create and the way we act. It means we’ll have to start working together. It means we’ll have to hold one other, and ourselves, to a higher standard. The time has come, though. We no longer have to change our names. We no longer have to blend in like chameleons. We own a whole freaking country. Instead, we can be proud of who we are, and simultaneously aware of our huge responsibility — and opportunity.

  • How the sheeple are herded by the illuminati's mass media
    war of the worlds
    It is no coincidence Orson Welles, using the power of the media and radio, created mass panic in America less than one year before the start of World War 2. In his radio drama the War of the Worlds aired on the 30 October 1938 Welles caused Americans to flee to the hills under the guise that aliens had invaded the planet. In less than a year World War 2 erupted on the 1 September 1939 and to this day zionist Hollywood and the mass media in general continue to manipulate a global audience with the same techniques.

    Whether its Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Gaza, Iran or Syria the same mass media are working overtime concentrating the minds of the sheeple only to happy to sanction the political mafia's murderous campaigns anywhere selected for their form of asset stripping the following article explains the power of manipulation sanctioned by the state.

    War of the Worlds, Orson Welles, And The Invasion from Mars

    The ability to confuse audiences en masse may have first become obvious as a result of one of the most infamous mistakes in history. It happened the day before Halloween, on Oct. 30, 1938, when millions of Americans tuned in to a popular radio program that featured plays directed by, and often starring, Orson Welles. The performance that evening was an adaptation of the science fiction novel The War of the Worlds, about a Martian invasion of the earth. But in adapting the book for a radio play, Welles made an important change: under his direction the play was written and performed so it would sound like a news broadcast about an invasion from Mars, a technique that, presumably, was intended to heighten the dramatic effect.

    As the play unfolded, dance music was interrupted a number of times by fake news bulletins reporting that a "huge flaming object" had dropped on a farm near Grovers Mill, New Jersey. As members of the audience sat on the edge of their collective seat, actors playing news announcers, officials and other roles one would expect to hear in a news report, described the landing of an invasion force from Mars and the destruction of the United States. The broadcast also contained a number of explanations that it was all a radio play, but if members of the audience missed a brief explanation at the beginning, the next one didn't arrive until 40 minutes into the program.

    At one point in the broadcast, an actor in a studio, playing a newscaster in the field, described the emergence of one of the aliens from its spacecraft. "Good heavens, something's wriggling out of the shadow like a gray snake," he said, in an appropriately dramatic tone of voice. "Now it's another one, and another. They look like tentacles to me. There, I can see the thing's body. It's large as a bear and it glistens like wet leather. But that face.'s indescribable. I can hardly force myself to keep looking at it. The eyes are black and gleam like a serpent. The mouth is V-shaped with saliva dripping from its rimless lips that seem to quiver and pulsate....The thing is raising up. The crowd falls back. They've seen enough. This is the most extraordinary experience. I can't find words. I'm pulling this microphone with me as I talk. I'll have to stop the description until I've taken a new position. Hold on, will you please, I'll be back in a minute."

    As it listened to this simulation of a news broadcast, created with voice acting and sound effects, a portion of the audience concluded that it was hearing an actual news account of an invasion from Mars. People packed the roads, hid in cellars, loaded guns, even wrapped their heads in wet towels as protection from Martian poison gas, in an attempt to defend themselves against aliens, oblivious to the fact that they were acting out the role of the panic-stricken public that actually belonged in a radio play. Not unlike Stanislaw Lem's deluded populace, people were stuck in a kind of virtual world in which fiction was confused for fact.

    News of the panic (which was conveyed via genuine news reports) quickly generated a national scandal. There were calls, which never went anywhere, for government regulations of broadcasting to ensure that a similar incident wouldn't happen again. The victims were also subjected to ridicule, a reaction that can commonly be found, today, when people are taken in by simulations. A cartoon in the New York World-Telegram, for example, portrayed a character who confuses the simulations of the entertainment industry with reality. In one box, the character is shown trying to stick his hand into the radio to shake hands with Amos n' Andy. In another, he reports to a police officer that there is "Black magic!!! There's a little wooden man -- Charlie McCarthy -- and he's actually talking!"

    In a prescient column, in the New York Tribune, Dorothy Thompson foresaw that the broadcast revealed the way politicians could use the power of mass communications to create theatrical illusions, to manipulate the public. "All unwittingly, Mr. Orson Welles and the Mercury Theater of the Air have made one of the most fascinating and important demonstrations of all time," she wrote. "They have proved that a few effective voices, accompanied by sound effects, can convince masses of people of a totally unreasonable, completely fantastic proposition as to create a nation-wide panic.

    "They have demonstrated more potently than any argument, demonstrated beyond a question of a doubt, the appalling dangers and enormous effectiveness of popular and theatrical demagoguery.... "Hitler managed to scare all of Europe to its knees a month ago, but he at least had an army and an air force to back up his shrieking words. "But Mr. Welles scared thousands into demoralization with nothing at all."

    In the 1950s, America had another taste of the power that simulations have, to draw people into a world of delusional fantasy, when paired with mass communications. This time it was revealed that a number of television game shows were simulations, in which contestants who knew the answers ahead of time were pretending to guess at their responses. But unlike the invasion from Mars, here the fakery was unambiguously intentional; it was the work of producers who had concluded they could create fictional game shows that would be more exciting than the real thing.

    Once again, there was a shocked reaction from the public. Once again, those involved became objects of public anger. And, as happened with the Orson Welles broadcast, an effort was made to ensure that such manipulations wouldn't recur.

    But in 1990, it happened again. Audiences around the world discovered that they were taken in by the ultimate Hollywood illusion in which two performers faked their own talent, lip-syncing, to create the impression they were singing. What millions of fans had believed were two talented singers was actually a composite, another seamless interweaving of sensory simulations in which two people provided the visuals, while vocalists provided the audio.

    As in the previous two instances, there was a stunned response. But unlike the experience of 1938 or even the 1950s, the social context was different because simulations had become commonplace, and attempts to use them to trick the public were the rule rather than the exception. Also by this time, a global culture had developed, which meant that tens of millions of people around the world were drawn into the same illusion.

    One might say that War of the Worlds and the game show scandal foreshadowed the age of simulation that was still to come. Allowing for a little poetic overstatement, the Milli Vanilli scandal served as a rite of passage or symbolic marker, making clear that we now live in an age of simulation confusion in which our tendency to mistake fakes for what they imitate has become one of the characteristic problems of the age.

    More to the point, we live in a time in which the ability to create deceptive simulations, especially for television, has become essential to the exercise of power. And the inability to see through these deceptions has become a form of powerlessness. Those who let themselves be taken in by the multiple deceptions of politics, news, advertising and public relations, are doomed, like the more gullible members of the radio audience in 1938, to play a role in other people's dramas, while mistakenly believing that they are reacting to something genuine.

  • The media ombudsman VIDEO
    Just who the hell is Chris Cuomo? VIDEO

  • Chris Cuomo mass media mouthpiece for ALL of America's shootings?(VIDEO)
  • CNN lawyer/reporter Chris Cuomo behind SUSPECT CNN reporting of Boston Bombing
  • CNN lawyer/reporter Chris Cuomo homosexual promoter and warmongerer
  • Did Chris Cuomo (while at ABC news) do Sandy Hook interview with horror movie actress posing as mother of a student?
  • CNN lawyer/reporter Chris Cuomo interviews (cross examines)Amanda Knox (VIDEO)
  • CNN lawyer/reporter Chris Cuomo an illuminati puppet?(VIDEO)
  • Freemason controlled media at its very worst

    Barclay brothers (Daily Telegraph), Jonathan Harmsworth (Daily Mail), Richard Desmond (Daily Express and Star ), Rupert Murdoch (Ex-News of the World, The Sun and Times) and BBC's Danny Cohen

    The compliant media are once again portraying freemason chief constables as some sort of moral guardians smearing the peasants as if they are ALL drunken bums needing to be led to the masonic slaughterhouse. A media that portrays British cops as the GOOD GUYS especially the masonic mafia mob who run ACPO when they are in fact a murdering bunch of psycho's who kill with impunity . Masonic assassins fully armed with the best of weaponry from vast arsenals, who at the drop of the Dukey Kent's freemason hat, will take out anyone who rocks the establishment boat .

    Here they are in the Daily Mail pontificating about the drunken peasantry that need a short sharp shock and to be thrown into drunk tanks like cattle as if they are pieces of shite that have just fallen off their well oiled fascist boots.

    The ACPO Association of Chief Police Officers wants to be able to put drunks in holding cells where they will be charged up to £400 a night

    The media have for decades been taking the dregs of society and displaying them on the likes of Jeremy Kyle's TV show and holding them up as examples as to why they require the attention of the freemasonry boot to bring them into line. They have psychotic billionaires like Jonathan Harmsworth and his inherited wealth who is allowed to spread his bile and hatred of the peasantry via the Daily Mail for and on behalf of the royals masonic henchmen to foment hatred by the sheeple against the poorest and most vulnerable sections of society.

    What is worse is that there are still millions of brain dead morons (sheeple) who actually believe the shite being pumped out by the press mafia including Harmsworth (Daily Mail), Murdoch (The Sun), Desmond(Daily Express), Barclay Brothers (The Telegraph ) and zionist Danny Cohen (BBC). That instead of making them squirm they actually believe those responsible for pumping out the bile and propaganda are in fact themselves scum and filth only to happy to prop up the royals and their masonic mafia as if they are the heroes while the peasantry continue to be portrayed as the the dregs of society that require the regular intervention of the masonic boot that has been stamping on our forefathers faces for centuries and who want to continue their tyranny via an obsessive media hell bent on smearing us at every opportunity with the sheeple still prepared to feed them by purchasing said rags.

    Come election time they will do the same with the political mafia where you will only see the three main parties endlessly regurgitating the shite that has also been going on for centuries with the sheeple failing to realise no matter which one of their three numpties gets into power they will still get the same garbage that keeps the masonic agenda on track i.e. the royal parasites ruling over us with an iron fist via their masonic henchmen. So just when are those sheeple in an advanced state of comatose going to STOP voting these scum and filth back into power to continue the merry go round of duping the goons for another four years and ad infinitum?

  • Govts threats to journos 'signalling rise of fascism' VIDEO
    'Snowden data destruction won't harm our reporting' - Guardian's Alan Rusbridger VIDEO
    Amazon's Jeff Bezos buys Washington Post VIDEO
    Media run by homosexuals, feminists, freemasons and zionists
    newspapers It will come as no surprise to heterosexual men who is behind mass media manipulation.

    We see every day attempts by ALL of the above groups to use men as scapegoats to get positive discrimination into the psyche which then allows these various parties to leech off of the only section of society that provides the muscle and backbone for a country to prosper. It is a freemason / zionist controlled government that provides the incentives for these self interested groups while de-incentivizing men with all sorts of taxes and charges especially after divorce .

    The media has a warped agenda when it comes to heterosexual men, the only time they provide positive stories is when men murder for the state in wars or when men work as police, jailors, civil servants, lawyers, judges, politicians and councillors. Mostly all other groups of men face negative discrimination in the media who smear us as wife beaters and abusers committing domestic violence on a daily basis , or what they class as violence even if we raise our voice to any member of our family to show our authority as the head of the household, that is prior to the wife walking out and using that nonsense to fleece her ex husband using courts run by freemason / zionist judges and lawyers 'Shout at your spouse lose your house.'

    The public have been primed throughout print history to expect the fall of men not part of the satanic network that uses feminists and homosexuals as weapons to hammer men into an early grave. Social services are massively burgeoning with homosexuals and lesbian feminists only to happy to provide the ammo in family courts to destroy heterosexual men. For any man as yet to face draconian family courts is a lesson in surviving some of the most extreme psychological torture every meted out even during wars as those you may have loved only days earlier are now used by the state as weapons of mass destruction both sinister and deadly for men trying to survive financial ruin and decimation of their family. Only men who have experienced manufactured laws torturous outcomes know how they squeeze men dry to fund the golddiggers and their legal agents intent on leeching from the men who had previously been keeping a countries infrastructure on the move. We don't see many feminists / homosexuals lining up to replace the wheel of an articulated lorry they ONLY want equality if its a cushy office job but anything manual they will happily leave heterosexual men to do without complaint.

    We are also seeing feminist / lawyers using the law to suppress sexual content aimed at men being closed down and blamed for men being violent towards women while male stripping is on the rise with no similar protesting from feminists. Any man who allows his wife to become part of the roaming predatory female gangs going to Chippendale shows deserves to be treated like a mouse with jack boot lesbians manipulating role reversal within the family. Freemason judges only to happy to provide the judgements (never juries) alienating non mason men as not worthy of any form of protection from THEIR laws manufactured by an evil cabal only interested in self enrichment from the vast fleecing of heterosexual men. Meantime satisfying their partners in crime the feminist thinking golddiggers who want wealth, not from hard graft, but from playing the victim card leading to the massive divorce settlements their crooked lawyer pals on endless legal aid can muster, manipulating laws heavily weighted in favour of feminists and enormously against protecting heterosexual men .

    There are millions of men wallowing in fleapits thanks to the sinister interactions of these evil bastards that we intend to endlessly expose and to counter the methods used to destroy heterosexual men on a daily basis.

  • Husband loses house to ex wife's new boyfriend (How marriage is the quickest way for men to get royally screwed)
  • Feminasty get LADS mags pulled from the shelves
  • Feminist VICTIMS think they have won the war
  • Feminism Turned Mom into Monster
  • Feminist get rich quick scheme: LIAM Gallagher facing £40million divorce battle with Nicole Appleton
  • Family Law: Conspiracy against Fathers
  • Murdoch mafia shaped British politics for 40 Years VIDEO

    How did Britain allow an Australian gangster to take over the political system? Maggie Thatcher aided and abetted the far right mafia boss.
    Murdoch continues his vile promotion of the royal parasites VIDEO
    barclay brothers The Telegraph's media mafia the Barclay brothers both Royalist lackeys

    Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay, owners of the Ritz hotel and the Telegraph newspapers, hired private detectives from Kroll to illegally obtain confidential information used to "intimidate and harass" a business rival, according to a legal claim in the United States.

    The allegation is the latest twist in a long-running battle between the brothers and the Irish property entrepreneur Paddy McKillen over control of Coroin, the £1bn hotel group behind Claridge's in Mayfair, in which both sides are shareholders.

    A spokesman for the Barclays said: "This is the first we have heard of this action. If such a suit has been filed it would appear to be a claim with no foundation that we shall deal with, as we have with Mr McKillen's previous claims." Kroll, who are not named as defendants to the claim, were unavailable for comment. Allegations that private detectives have been deployed by the Barclays follow a string of courtroom revelations that have shone a spotlight on one of the most poisonous feuds in recent corporate history.

    At one stage Tony Blair was involved in attempts to resolve the spat, the high court in London heard last year, while on another occasion the Barclays approached Manchester City owner Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed al-Nahyan about teaming up to take control of the hotel group. Meanwhile, Qatar's ruling al-Thani family is believed to have provided financial support to McKillen. At the heart of the row is an allegation that the Barclays made side payments to the family of McKillen's fellow Coroin shareholder Derek Quinlan, an over-extended Irish property tycoon who has told Nama, Ireland's state-owned toxic loan management operation, that he will never be able to repay the millions he owes. In exchange, McKillen argues, Quinlan in effect surrendered control of his interest in the hotel group to them.

    The very private Barclay twins refused invitations to give evidence in court in London last year but in a written statement insisted substantial payments to Quinlan had not been connected to their ambitions to win control of Coroin. Rather, the brothers claimed, payments had been made out of compassion for an old family friend who had fallen on hard times. In a ruling last August Mr Justice David Richards said he saw no evidence suggesting advances of £1.86m and €1m from the brothers, between late 2010 and early 2012, were part of a contract struck with the Quinlans. McKillen is appealing against this decision, and a final determination is expected from the courts within weeks.

    The latest US claim accuses the Barclay brothers and their associates of employing Kroll to obtain confidential and personal information about McKillen. The Barclay camp had allegedly "acquired [ McKillen's US] social security number through a secretive investigative process, for no legitimate purpose". Kroll then allegedly used this and other personal details to request a credit report on McKillen, allegedly under false pretences. In McKillen's claim, his lawyer John Hueston, said: "The conduct described not only gives rise to … this [civil] complaint, but also constitutes a criminal offence under … the Fair Credit Reporting Act".

    According to the claim, the defendants acted "knowingly, willfully and wrongfully … in an attempt to gain a litigation and business advantage over [McKillen], and with the ultimate goal of intimidating and harassing him." In the long-running British legal action McKillen has claimed the Barclays used unlawful means to in effect buy out his fellow shareholders and secure majority control of the group. The Irishman believes, under the terms of a shareholder agreement, his fellow investors should have offered their shares to him before selling out to the Barclays.

    The twins reject such arguments – and counter that at the time of the deals McKillen was facing acute financial issues and was not, in any event, in a position to buy out his fellow investors. Much of the borrowed money McKillen used to build his property empire prior to the Irish banking crash of 2008 was from banks that have since failed, leaving the loans managed by administrators. The Barclays have attempted to buy up these debts – something McKillen has so far managed to block.

  • The Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger is no better, despite recent disclosures, than any other press baron and from the private school brigade
  • Guardian make the fatal mistake of promoting the royal parasites (check the comments section)

    Barclay brothers (Daily Telegraph), Jonathan Harmsworth (Daily Mail), Richard Desmond (Daily Express and Star ), Rupert Murdoch (Ex-News of the World, The Sun and Times) and BBC's Danny Cohen

    You'll find them EVERYWHERE literally EVERYWHERE. Particularly in the United Kingdom thousands upon thousands of psychopaths, NOT inside mental institutions, but running the country into the ground. From the royals right down to the bottom of the management tree, psychopaths are being used to control to gain maximum advantage from the peasants enslavement.

    It might take a lifetime of labour and trying to provide for a family to waken up to the nightmare scenario that total nutcases are controlling every area of our lives to the enormous detriment of our livelihoods but that is indeed the case. From press barons groomed to promote the royals and their freemason minions who have been infiltrated into every area of life Britain is led by psychopaths and just one look at the Tory governments scum and filth Cameron and his cabinet henchmen like Osborne , Iain Duncan Smith and Chris Grayling shows the degree to which psychopaths have been elevated to powerful positions and NOT by a democratic process but by the devious machinations of a system that supposedly answers to the people but are in fact lackeys for the ruling parasites. Eton the main centre for grooming the royals future sick and psychopathic henchmen.

    Whether its political, police,legal or council scum we are all being controlled to a greater or lesser degree by deviants who, despite their psychopathic tendencies, remain loyal to their masters while showing the most ruthless behaviour and why so many of the citizens of the UK suffer under tyrannical rule ensuring these vile bastards can eat out of the royals golden trough while the peasants are driven to despair with manufactured austerity.

    What is worst of all is that the sheeple have faith in and believe that these maniacs have their best interests at heart, rather than the monstrous power structure that keeps murdering despots in charge while real talent is stifled to ensure only their psychopathic lackeys make all the important decisions and that ensures the class system remains fully in control or was until the internet has rewritten all the rules and now they are desperately trying to shut down the free flow of information exposing their vast criminality that has impoverished and persecuted the many victims of their vile despotism, and NOT if we can help it.


  • The stranglehold of a handful of giant media corporations on public life
  • MoD serves news outlets with D notice over surveillance leaks
    d notice These evil bastards having been censoring news using ancient war time 'D notices' that are not fit for purpose in an open society

    BBC and other media groups issued with D notice to limit publication of information that could 'jeopardise national security'

    Defence officials issued a confidential D notice to the BBC and other media groups in an attempt to censor coverage of surveillance tactics employed by intelligence agencies in the UK and US. Editors were asked not to publish information that may "jeopardise both national security and possibly UK personnel" in the warning issued on 7 June, a day after the Guardian first revealed details of the National Security Agency's (NSA) secret Prism programme.

    The D notice is marked "private and confidential: not for publication, broadcast or use on social media". Although only advisory for editors, the self-censorship system is intended to prevent the media from making "inadvertent public disclosure of information that would compromise UK military and intelligence operations and methods".

    The warning was issued by defence officials in the UK as the BBC, ITN, Sky News and other newspapers and broadcasters around the world covered the surveillance revelations disclosed by the NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden. The leaks, reported extensively in the Guardian and also the Washington Post, have made headlines on both sides of the Atlantic for more than a week. However, it is not clear what impact the warning has had on media coverage of Snowden's revelations relating to British intelligence. William Hague, the foreign secretary, who is reponsible for GCHQ, was not asked when he appeared on Monday's BBC Radio 4 Today programme about reports that the spy agency was involved in monitoring communications made by foreign delegates at the G20 summit in London 2009. Instead the subject was discussed in an item aired towards the end of the programme at 8.45am.

    A BBC spokeswoman declined to comment on the D notice, but pointed out that the broadcaster did cover the G20 surveillance story on its radio news bulletins. She said the BBC believed it had "afforded the story" what the broadcaster described as "the appropriate level of coverage" among other significant news items, "including the ongoing G8 summit, the sentencing of Stuart Hall, the Co-op Bank bailout and the Ian Brady hearing".

    "There have been a number of articles recently in connection with some of the ways in which the UK intelligence services obtain information from foreign sources. "Although none of these recent articles has contravened any of the guidelines contained within the defence advisory notice system, the intelligence services are concerned that further developments of this same theme may begin to jeopardise both national security and possibly UK personnel."

  • Spying for spying's sake: spooks and their intelligence addiction

    Disinformation founder Gary Baddeley chats with June about her research for the show, HAARP, and working with Jesse.

    About Conspiracy Theory: Jesse Ventura and a team of expert investigators are on a mission to examine some of the most frightening and mysterious conspiracy allegations of our time. They examine available evidence as well as talking to experts and eyewitnesses to learn more about such topics as global warming, possible 9/11 cover-ups, secret government weapons and apocalyptic prophecies.

    The BBC has proven time and again they can take a talentless nonentity and create a superstar. Predatory paedo Jimmy Savile, who was protected by the BBC head honcho's for over 40 years while he busily abused 1000's of children, had little talent . He was thrust onto the general public, despite looking and acting like a bloody pervert ,and on close inspection of his very limited attributes the only two that stand out are the inordinate amount of time he spent kissing the Royal arse and his political leader vile tory Margaret Thatcher. Savile was a working class mouthpiece for the establishment as the peasants were sick of hearing the BBC snobs reading the news and presenting their programs so they had to bring in some working class HERO's or at least create them for the long suffering public.

    Savile was hoisted onto a monopolistic platform when the BBC and only the BBC could get a licence to produce TV programs and with little or no competition nonentities and creeps like Savile could become stars on the back of very little talent. The modern day version of Savile is Simon Cowell a zionist leaning nonentity who has been hoisted onto the public using talent shows and where Cowell himself shows very little talent other than to slate his victims who show varying degrees of mental health problems and who shouldn't be being used by Cowell as scapegoats for his ego.

    However the main purpose of the mainstream media was to take the real talentless bastards and despots like the British royal family, who show no apparent talent other than being the sprogs of some of the most vile murdering scum and filth on the planet and raise them onto platforms that glorify them , as is the case with Cowell's Britains Got Talent in that the top prize is to perform in front of the royal parasite herself.

    The hero's that are being foisted on the sheeple are NOTHING of the kind but establishment puppets and the establishment themselves who follow the propaganda ensuring they are kept in glass cages and ivory towers and who expect the public to show undying deference. Well that was until the internet came along and exposed the utter madness that sees sick and twisted psychopaths being promoted for public consumption and mass brainwashing by their press baron buddies

    bill o'reilly Not forgetting he works for that other right wing criminal nutjob Murdoch
    'Sit Back And Watch Americans Die '

    Bill O'Reilly used his "Talking Points Memo" segment Monday night to criticize the "left-wing media" for politicizing the Boston Marathon bombings. In particular, O'Reilly set his sights on NBC's Tom Brokaw, who suggested on Meet The Press this weekend the U.S. should examine its drone policy in light of latest attacks in Boston. O'Reilly challenged Brokaw to come on his show and defend his assertions, asking, "do you want to sit back and let terrorists hatch their plots and watch Americans die at home and on the battlefield?" O'Reilly was clearly seething at Brokaw for "putting some of the motivation for the Boston bombings on his own country," but predicted that the veteran reporter would reject his offer of a debate so he doesn't have "associate with the peasants here on The Factor." He went on to explain why he thinks it's absurd to equate an "act of terror" that kills civilians to an "act of war" that does the same. "This ridiculous left-wing moral equivalency is insulting."

    The host was surprised to find out that his frequent guest and usual sparring partner Juan Williams actually agreed with his assessment of Brokaw, but things between the two men turned sour when O'Reilly started attacking President Obama for not using the term "Muslim terrorism" to describe the Boston bombings. Williams said that it would be jumping the gun to call the attacks "Muslim terrorism" since we don't yet know the motives of the suspects. "It's terrorism," he said, "I don't care where it came from."

    O'Reilly turned his anger towards Williams at that point, screaming at him "yes we do" know that the attacks were driven by Islam and "I'm not leaping" to conclusions. He asked if Williams had seen "all of the reportage about the guy on social media putting all of this stuff about jihad on there. Don't you know that Juan?" Mary Katharine Ham jumped into the conversation, saying, "everybody in the media is happy to leap to conclusions when they think it might be somebody right of center." She added that the media only hesitates to make assumptions when "when the guy in question has YouTube links going to al Qaeda and other extremist imams."

    O'Reilly is right that Brokaw is unlikely to come on his Fox News show for a debate, but it would certainly make for some entertaining television.
    Blackout TV as American media turn a blind eye to Gitmo hunger strike VIDEO
    ok propaganda



    Apart from the Daily Express Desmond has prime spots in every newsagent the length and breadth of the UK to push his royal bullshit. Enter any shop in the UK and his vile bile will be staring you right in the face.

  • Press baron Richard Desmond history


    Rupert Murdoch might be a familiar figure to most people as his ego wont allow him to remain in the background however the sneakier of the two of these vile press barons Jonathan Harmsworth keeps himself under the radar while he spouts his vile bile and hatred of the poor in newspapers he controls both within the UK and globally. His family also has a long history of affection for fascism and just reading one page of his main propaganda machine the Daily Mail would be enough to convince anyone that he is a psychopath who rants endlessly about the Royal mafia while smearing the poor for being POOR with HATE propaganda .

    Murdoch is already well known for his vile warmongering, royalist loving, poor hating rags. His upmarket version The Times appeals to the British establishment types while his tacky rag the Sun appeals to the ned culture that he helps cultivate with some of the most vile accounts of the peasants as the cause of all the woes across Britain. He is also responsible for the subterfuge that saw the death of Daniel Morgan a private investigator in a car park in London who was found with an axe in his head while he was trying to expose met cops dealing in drugs.

    These two provide the mass coverage of the bullshit that is available in every newsagent across Britain. They were called to the Leveson inquiry into the criminal use of private dicks to gather info on their unsuspecting victims who they use to destroy ANYONE who does not follow their establishment agenda. Yesterday while the three joke political parties discussed what they would be doing to control these gangsters post Leveson statements started to appear that Murdoch and Harmsworth " threaten the boycott of regulator if plan proposed by Labour agreed to".

    ALL of their vile rags ranted on about FREEDOM of the press but they have failed to realise Leveson was NOT supposed to be about freedom of expression but about the criminal activities these bastards got up to and that they were not just reporting news but using subterfuge and criminality to gather data on anyone that they targeted for their form of destruction. Murdoch has been expert at propping up right wing political leaders like Blair and Cameron, and the bigger worry is that Alex Salmond got into power thanks to Murdoch backing him while his rag the Scottish Sun targeted the Socialist party leader Tommy Sheridan with the full support of the Scottish judiciary and police who aided and abetted the jailing of Sheridan to ensure Salmond had a safe passage to become First Minister, Scots now only finding out the hidden agenda of Salmond who has two lawyers as his henchmen in McAskill and Sturgeon.

    Apart from Harmsworth's delusions of grandeur and his psychopathic tendencies towards the British Royals, the richest despots on the planet, he backs every single policy created by the tory party even if those policies are killing British citizens en masse. At the last count at least 32 every week thanks to the fascist agenda of the scum and filth now running the country and who previously were groomed for power at the Queens brainwashing establishment at ETON. That is before they get hand picked to stand for election as a charade for some sort of democratic process.

    There is no doubt these two evil bastards are responsible for much of what is seriously wrong in the United Kingdom when so many of the SHEEPLE are manipulated by some of the most perverted reporting of what is supposed to be newspapers. Instead they are propaganda machines that have been responsible for the massive inequality that has kept the ruling royal mafia in power while the peasants are cajoled into seeing each other as the cause of all their troubles and not the twisted establishment who are promoted at every opportunity by these scum and filth.


    "The renewed political discussions came as three of Britain's largest newspaper groups, including the owners of the Sun and the Daily Mail, ramped up the pressure by signaling that they were prepared to boycott the proposed press watchdog and set up their own body if Labour and the Lib Dems succeed in creating a statutory underpinning of the new royal charter."

    "Ultimately we are not about grandstanding on this. We are about getting a press law that works and protects the press and gives justice to victims of press abuse."

    "Downing Street said it was unable to answer the latest of several requests from the Guardian to reveal how many meetings the prime minister has had with editors, publishers or representatives of the press."

  • Evil press barons at the Daily Mail (Harmsworth), the Sun (Murdoch), the Times (Murdoch), the Telegraph (Barclay Bros), the Daily Star(Desmond) and the Daily Express(Desmond) taking "high-level legal advice" about whether to co-operate with new press watchdog
  • Harmsworths zionist mouthpiece Phillips and her diatribe about press freedoms
  • Evil press barons including owners of Sun (vile Murdoch) and Mail (vile Harmsworth) threaten boycott of regulator if plan proposed by Labour agreed to
  • Harmsworth Daily rag 'the smearer of the poor' while promoting the rich and their taste in expensive property