These evil bastards are the ultimate terrorists causing more mayhem than ALL other terrorist threats put together and
sanctioned by STATE tyranny
At what time in the dim and distant past did an evil group of perverts decide THEY alone would decide the fate
of every child born across world? That THEY would usurp the natural power vested in men to ensure only the biological
father has the god given right to protect his children against all dangers but especially state tyranny?
Children have for to long been used as a means to line the pockets of man hating feminists while ensuring the
crown and its vast army of freemason legal lackeys can seize non-mason men's assets under the guise that they are
protecting women and children when the only reason they do take the time and effort is to line their own greedy pockets
with those men's hard earned cash. Also the extreme lengths they will go over decades spending enormous amounts of
time and effort persecuting men using a massive legal aid pot to ensure they can squeeze every last drop from men
targeted by the utter scum and dregs of the earth. Only that their extraction system is so lucrative would they
waste so much time and effort browbeating men into submission.
Men who have been caught out in the biggest legal scam in history need to educate young men and boys about
the dangers they face while steps are taken to eradicate the evil bastard legal mafia, who have over centuries,
manipulated their form of LAW to take away the biological protection children require that only a good father
can provide and ONLY a father, and not for jack boot lesbians that have infested social services and womens aid
to suggest to women the very opposite. Large numbers of lesbians have also infested the legal system as well as
homosexuals virtually running social work for the ulterior motives of an evil crown. Queen Lizzie would NOT be
so rich if this vile agenda, manufactured by her freemason lackeys, had not been set in motion and with little
resistance from men who have been to busy working hard and earning a living to keep their children fed and clothed.
The homosexual leaning media, while promoting gays, lesbians and judges positively, smear heterosexual men constantly
to ensure the judicial mafia have endless continued excuses to remove children from their fathers protection that
can led in many cases to seized children ending up in care homes and preyed upon by predatory paedo's like the
BBC's Jimmy Savile sanctioned by the main freemason run public broadcaster, freemason cops, freemason social
workers and especially freemason judges. That main public broadcaster regularly targets men as wife beaters and
abusers despite they themselves having a long history of protecting abusers and predatory paedo's like Jimmy
Savile, Stuart Hall, Rolf Harris and Jimmy Tarbuck.
This madness has to STOP and STOP now and men not yet caught up in these monstrous scams need to heed the
warnings from men that have tasted the harassment and persecution in action and have seen many fathers murdered
by the system using psychological torture while leaving millions of others homeless and penniless.
Pennsylvania judge sentenced to 28 years in prison for selling teens to prisons
Disgraced Pennsylvania judge Mark Ciavarella Jr has been sentenced to 28 years in prison for conspiring with private prisons to sentence juvenile offenders to maximum sentences for bribes and kickbacks which totaled millions of dollars. He was also ordered to pay $1.2 million in restitution.
In the private prison industry the more time an inmate spends in a facility, the more of a profit is reaped from the state. Ciavearella was a figurehead in a conspiracy in the state of Pennsylvania which saw thousands of young men and women unjustly punished and penalized in the name of corporate profit.
According to allgov.com Ciavearella's cases from 2003 - 2008 were reviewed by a special investigative panel and later by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and it was found that upwards of 5,000 young men and women were denied their constitutional rights, and therefore all of their convictions were dismissed and were summarily released.
During his sentencing Ciavarella was defiant, claiming he had broken no laws and claimed the money he received was a legitimate 'finders fee.' Assistant U.S. Attorney Gordon Zubrod said comments such as these were typical of Ciavarella, according to the local reporting of citizensvoice.com.
I think that's his way of doing things. Never retreat. Always go on the attack. Always blame somebody else. Always get them to back off. He tried it with the judge. It didn't work.
JUDICIAL FREELOADERS LUXURY £18K TAXPAYER FUNDED BREAKS TO CHAT ABOUT 'LAW'
TOP judges have blown nearly £18,000 of taxpayers’ cash on a series of countryside getaways.
They regularly flee London for a luxury hotel to chat about the justice system.
The retreats take place at the posh Old Swan and Minster Mill — a restored 600-year-old coaching inn in PM David Cameron’s constituency at Witney, Oxfordshire.
It calls itself “quintessentially English”, while boasting award-winning gardens and beamed ceilings.
Members of the Judicial Executive Board have held three country escapes there since 2010 at a cost of almost £18,000.
The real bill is likely to be far higher as the practice is thought to date back years.
Former Justice Secretary Jack Straw joined 11 senior judges and two top civil servants for a two-day getaway costing £6,850.60 in 2010.
Astonishingly, the board held a meeting at London’s Royal Courts of Justice in 2011 which cost just £755.
But they headed back to the Cotswolds twice in 2012 — with a February break costing £4,883, and another in December even higher at £6,107.
That was attended by nine senior judges, who earn almost £1.9million between them.
They included Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge, Master of the Rolls Lord Dyson and Senior President of Tribunals Sir Jeremy Sullivan.
TaxPayers’ Alliance chief executive Matthew Sinclair blasted: “While everybody else is cutting back, the Lord Chief Justice is happy to spend other people’s money like it’s going out of fashion.”
A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: “Costs like these will not be authorised in the future and we are scrutinising our spending to prevent excess.”
I am informed that Charlton Harris is up on a building opposite the Royal Courts of Injustice in London.
My information is that he has unfurled a banner protesting at the injustice and corruption he has experienced at the hands of members of our legal and judicial systems.
He would welcome the support of other victims of the 'system' to help him highlight and expose the endemic corruption within the 'system' which we have all been victims of.
JUDICIAL MAFIA: I PROVE MY STUPIDITY AGAIN
I prove my stupidity – again!
Apart from my natural, inborn stupidity, I was as gullible as the rest of the British people in believing (as we were constantly told) that ‘British Judges are the Finest in the World’. Well, perhaps they are, but if so, then God help the rest of the world!
This gullibility came to end from the age of 70, with a succession of shocks, all my lifelong beliefs shattered, as I began to learn that they are the Godfathers of the Legal Mafia. - the finest Protection Racket in the world!
Gullible no longer, in memory of all those men who died around me in World War 2, AND what we believed we were fighting for, I made it my mission in life to expose them.
It is a fact that, all over the world, lawyers are despised, yet in Britain, the worst of them become judges. By ‘worst’ I mean those who are regarded as the best, because they have ability to twist the truth to such an extent that they make lots & lots of money.
They promote themselves as Gods, make pronouncements as though they were Gods, the sycophantic ‘News Media’ & corrupt MPs cynically leading the populace in worshipping them as Gods!.
They have seized unto themselves ‘Absolute Power’ (once the prerogative of Kings), & will destroy anyone they perceive to be a threat to that power.
They even pay me the compliment of seeing me, a little old man, as a threat, & for the last 17 years have been trying to destroy me!
NOW TO COME TO MY LATEST STUPIDITY: During these last 17 years, with my new-found knowledge about the Legal Mafia, I thought that, because I had survived their attacks, I was now pretty smart, especially because I had the wit to flee from ‘Perfidious Albion’ (Google the phrase) & escape the fate they had in store for me (see McCardle document, attached).
Safe here in Ireland, I have watched with amusement the antics of the NORTHERN BRANCH of the Mafia, led by Circuit Judge Jonathan Lee Rose & his sidekicks, District Judge Roy Anderson in Leeds & District Judge Jonathan Taaffe in Manchester, & the SOUTHERN BRANCH, led by Attorney General Dominic Grieve in London. For all the vast amount of taxpayers’ money they were spending, their attempts to silence me by putting me away in a Nuthouse for the rest of my life were going to prove futile.
Then came a momentous happening: Lord Ivor Judge, the Lord Chief Justice of England, THE HIGHEST JUDGE IN THE LAND, decided HE was going hear the Attorney General’s Application to have me incarcerated. It was astonishing that this mighty man decided that he himself would deal with this trivial matter about one little old man.
With ‘a triumph of hope over experience’, I actually thought that Lord Judge must have felt a twinge of conscience & had decided that, in his retirement year, he intended to make a landmark Ruling to remove a most oppressive practice in our courts.
Even if wrong in that, with Common Law, Statutes & Precedents that he was BOUND to follow, I felt he could not do otherwise than dismiss the AGs Application. Oh how wrong I was, Oh how STUPID I was, to think he would actually rule in accordance with The Law of the Land!
I understand he actually repeated the poisonous lies & distortions of the truth from the Attorney General’s Gang – completely irrelevant to the charges against me - which should NEVER have been allowed in court.
He made himself look good to some people with what they thought was a wonderful new ruling about recorders in court, when it was not new at all.
Having decided to impose a sentence of 28 days in prison, suspended for one year, apparently he also spent 15 minutes or so discussing ‘Jurisdiction in Ireland’, his twisted mind pondering on how he could get his hands on me here – in spite of the fact that he had imposed a SUSPENDED sentence!
Is there no end to the malice, the sadism of these people?
“Be you never so high, the law is above you”, said Thomas Fuller (1608-1661), quoted by the ‘great’ Lord Denning when giving judgement against the Attorney General. A much greater authority said, “Be you never so low, the lawyer is below you!”
Dr Johnson said, “I hate to speak ill of anyone, but that man is a lawyer”.
Frederick the Great of Prussia was in London when the subject of lawyers came up:
“I have but four in my whole Kingdom” said he “and propose to hang three of them on my return!”
“I will not be happy until every German sees it as a disgrace to be a lawyer” said Hitler.
So, Adolf wasn’t wrong on EVERYTHING!
We live in interesting times!
THE QUEEN'S CROWN JUDGES TRAUMATIZE AND ABUSE CHILDREN EVERY DAY
BBC's top presenter Jimmy Savile caused horrendous trauma to the 100's of victims of his abuse especially within the hallowed walls of the supposed morally upstanding BBC premises. For his actions he got an OBE and a knighthood
from the Royal parasite.
Here we have the head honcho in the UK and globally providing honours to a sick psychopath when she would have known , via her secret service agents working for MI5 and 6, that Savile was an evil child abuser. This isn't the first time child abusers have been part of the inner circle of the Royal parasite .
There have been Queens butlers jailed for abuse against kids , choirmasters attached to the parasites choirs caught abusing children but worst of all there are abuses that go on every day , and like Savile seldom if ever get reported in her compliant media, ALL of them controlled via freemasonry, and they are the abuses inflicted by her freemason henchmen who operate as the British judiciary.
Children are being mentally tortured through the evils of family courts and where children are removed from good fathers on a whim to satisfy the greed and psychopathic madness of judges hand picked and rubber stamped by old Lizzie to inflict some of the most horrendous mental torture on our children. There may not be signs of physical abuse but the mental scars are much deeper when the psychological abuse goes on for many years and into adulthood when the state rendering machine comes in to destroy families to satisfy the greed of the mobsters running family courts.
Child protection gives freemasons running the show incredible powers over fathers and their children, under the guise of protecting golddigging mothers and their crooked legal aid funded lawyers.
So who is to blame for all of this? Not only was she dishing out tacky honours to Savile but she also honours the legal, judicial and cop mafia's that abuse in her name . When you take into account that it is Her Majesty's courts and Her Majesty's constabulary it doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out who is behind the long term abuses of our children . Some may ask why is this going on and what are the motives behind children being abused en masse? Also why the same bastards are also behind the cover up of the abuses inflicted by Savile on 100's of children while a top BBC presenter?
Campaign for Truth & Justice will be presenting an application seeking a writ of Habeas Corpus for the lifting of a 12 year travel ban imposed upon my liberty following an unlawful conviction.
The lawfulness of the conviction has never been challenged because the judiciary has previously blocked all access to court which caused me to spend 6 years unlawfully locked up in prison.
The difficulty for the judiciary is that, no one can be a judge in his own cause and no lawbreaker can be a law enforcer.
If Justice prevails, the judiciary will collapse.
The silence of the media and other agencies has aided and abetted an ongoing corruption within the judiciary but these issues and more will be aired in court 12th October 2012, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, 10:30am
Be there to support justice and kick hypocrisy to the kerb.
No one is above the law and this applies to the judiciary.
If there is no justice, there will be anarchy.
Caul Grant Campaign for Truth & Justice
UK JUDGE ISSUES WARRANT FOR HIS OWN ARREST FOR TREASON VIDEO
Judge left holding the hot potato as he rushes from the Court Room, after agreeing with the prosecution to serve a warrant for his own arrest.
This was a 'Friend of the Court' who did not lay claim to the Name / 'corporate fiction' that is copyright of 'The Crown' . Full movie uncensored public gallery torretts ; )
UK'S CORRUPT JUDGES BEING CHALLENGED BY THE PEOPLE (APRIL 2011) VIDEO
The LAWFUL "de jure Grand JURY" of 23, 25 free men of the Shire, Must meet, take evidence, vote to indict, and ISSUE a TRUE BILL OF INDICTMENT. THAT is what is missing from from this video. Do it RIGHT, Roger may have, but he should have given the SHERIFF of the Shire [ or county ] first option to come with the crowd and effectuate the ARREST. IF the Sheriff refuses, then Roger can have a Shire, or County Militia, ARMED , go arrest the JUDGE, and take him to the jail for booking. Of course, the Arrested Judge, has a right to bail, to see the TRUE BILL of INDICTMENT.
several dozen filed into the Treasonous Judges courtroom, and announced the ARREST of the sitting Treasonous JUDGE, 2 men moved forward to seize the judge and Bailiffs interfere with the Lawful Arrest under Section 61 of the Magna Carta.
LAW THAT PREVENTS THE EXPOSURE OF CORRUPT JUDGES TO BE AXED
Historic law on scorning judges faces axe as experts question whether it is still needed
The offence has not been successfully prosecuted in England and Wales since 1931
The crime of ‘scandalising a court’ may soon be consigned to history.
The offence can be committed if someone does or publishes anything that ridicules the judiciary to such an extent that it is likely to bring the administration of justice into disrepute.
This can include being extremely offensive towards a member of the judiciary or suggesting they are corrupt.
Yesterday, the Law Commission - a panel of experts which advises the government - opened a consultation asking whether the offence, a form of contempt of court, is still necessary.
The offence has not been successfully prosecuted in England and Wales since 1931 and doubts have been raised about whether it should continue to exist.
Legal experts suspect the law may not be compatible with the right to free speech, which is guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights and Labour’s Human Rights Act.
In addition, most of the activities covered by the offence could be dealt with in other ways - for example by using the law of libel or, if the activity was particularly serious, bringing criminal charges for other offences, the commission said.
Some people have also questioned why the judiciary should be offered special protection, the Law Commission said.
The aim of the consultation is to ask whether the law is necessary in modern society in England and Wales.
The commission’s provisional view is that it should be abolished.
Ministers will not be bound by the findings of the consultation.
Judges deserve the red card for pressurising news websites
Heavy-handed tactics such as asking sites to take down old stories show little understanding of today's web-savvy public
In the light of recent events, it is perhaps dangerous to mix up football and the courts. But one way to summarise the way the judicial process works is that when it comes to a trial, all that is allowed to count is what happens on the pitch in front of the jury.
For those who prefer the more lawyerly approach, an alternative explanation of how trials work was offered by Mr Justice Tugendhat last week: "The system of trial by jury rests on the assumption that a jury will follow the judge's directions and return a true verdict according to the evidence and that the jury will focus on the evidence rather than matters outside the courtroom."
Fine words perhaps, although the high court judge was in the process of finding the Mirror and the Mail in contempt for coverage that prevented a jury being allowed to reach a verdict on the attempted kidnap of an 11-year-old girl by Levi Bellfield the day after the same jury had prejudiced themselves by finding him guilty of murdering Milly Dowler.
Well, that's justice of course, but the real problem is that in the internet era, veiling jurors in prelapsarian innocence just isn't realistic. After all, anybody with a smartphone can simply Google the name of a defendant over lunch, and find historic news coverage, Twitter feeds, and maybe a Facebook page or two. But that hasn't stopped judges from trying to stand in the way of the internet tide and resorting to all sorts of heavy-handed tactics.
At the beginning of the trial of Simon Harwood – found not guilty of the manslaughter of Ian Tomlinson – newspapers were asked by Mr Justice Fulford to purge their online archives of articles referring to a "road rage" incident that occurred in 2001. The theory being there was a risk that the jury might read them, and it had been decided that character evidence was not to form part of Harwood's trial. To be clear, these were legitimately reported news stories – after all, in situations where there is some gap before a suspect is arrested or charged, it is quite properly the task of journalism to try to establish the truth.
More to the point, nobody was terribly clear what law Fulford was relying on to recreate an internet year zero – the issue was too broad to be covered by contempt of court.
However, the newspapers' goodwill meant that they chose to comply. The last holdout was the Mail's publisher, Associated Newspapers, which felt that in order to get the trial under way it was appropriate to let a few articles go.
One can only imagine what could have happened if counsel for the defendants in the Stephen Lawrence case argued for news websites to be expunged, a case that was the subject of one or two pieces of journalism before Gary Dobson and David Norris were charged. Lawyers on the scene said the judge also wanted Harwood's Wikipedia entry amended – why not also shut down Twitter?
One would hope that judges had more faith. Last week, again, in a case that raised similar issues, Mr Justice Flaux, presiding in a Birmingham riots murder trial, banned the coverage of a BBC2 dramatisation of the riots using obscure powers under the Senior Courts Act 1981. The dramas did not mention the city or the facts of the case. But while Flaux concluded that he might be able to direct jurors not to watch the programmes, for fear it might make them less sympathetic to the defendants, he still believed that somebody could tell jurors what had been on in the pub. Enough, then, for him to direct what millions could watch.
What's more extraordinary, though, is that a whole country, the US, seems to conduct trials without worrying much about the media or online noise surrounding a case. No doubt American jurors are simply smarter.
WAS G20 COP MURDER JUDGE A FREEMASON PROTECTING HIS BROTHER?
On the sidelines of the Simon Harwood trial, the judge, Mr Justice Fulford, has looked at how high-profile cases are reported in the internet age, making decisions with potentially far-reaching significance for the media.
Fulford cited earlier newspaper reports giving some general details about Harwood's chequered disciplinary record, information which, he had already ruled, the jury should not hear. The judge feared that if jurors stumbled across such details it could influence a decision supposedly based purely on what happened in court, a key aspect of contempt of court law.
The prosecution drew up an initially lengthy list of suspect newspaper articles, including some in the Guardian. In the end Fulford asked just the Telegraph and the Mail websites to remove stories voluntarily, which they did.
The Mail group sought to clarify the request, asking Fulford whether he would issue a formal, retrospective, order that two articles should have been removed at the start of the trial.
Fulford, who is also the presiding judge in the Rebekah Brooks obstruction of justice case, confirmed this at the end of the trial, saying he would give his reasons later. As a precedent this has the potential to fundamentally alter the way the media report trials in the digital era. In the gap between an alleged offence and arrest (and, in practice, sometimes between arrest and charging, and even between arrest and trial) it is common to report details that cannot be raised once a court case begins.
That was particularly relevant in the case of Harwood, when it initially seemed there was going be no prosecution.If Fulford's reasoning becomes accepted, then before any jury trial each media group will need to comb their digital archives for stories containing potential contempt of court issues. For websites the size of the BBC this would be a full-time job, probably for several people.
It would also create numerous anomalies, one of which was pointed out by Jonathan Caplan QC, for the Mail's publishers, Associated Newspapers. The question was: would newspapers also need to make sure they did not keep archived, physical, copies of such offending articles?
It was simply not practical, Caplan said, to "ringfence jurors" in the internet age and they had to be trusted to follow a judge's instructions to not carry out their own research on the internet.
Some of the discussions had, at times, the feel of a court in the 1950s looking into the strange new phenomenon of popular music.
Fulford asked if Google could be requested to censor web searches to exclude specific articles. How would one best contact Wikipedia to make such a request? And if this failed, could web servers be compelled to do it?
As the judge directed his focus on UK newspaper websites, less regulated parts of the digital world, notably Twitter and Facebook, were awash with discussion about Harwood's character and his possible guilt.
This went unremarked until highlighted by Christine Michalos, a barrister with expertise in digital matters who was asked to brief the court.
She informed the judge that unless the potential contempt of court was flagrant a trial judge had no powers to try to personally "clean up" the internet. This was not such a case, she advised.
It remains to be seen how far a single high court judge can reshape digital reporting. What is certain is that media organisations will study Fulford's ruling carefully and, most likely, challenge it.
WIFE BATTERING JUDGE ALLOWED TO RETURN TO WORKING IN COURT
THE VERY BASTARDS WHO HAVE CHARGED THEMSELVES WITH SMEARING MEN AS ABUSERS ARE THEY
THEMSELVES THE BIGGEST THUGS AND BULLIES OF ALL. ANOTHER FREEMASON JUDICIAL LACKEY
GETS SHOWN MERCY BY HIS LODGE BUDDIES?
Disgraced Wakefield judge who hit wife can work in court again
A DISGRACED High Court judge sacked for hitting his wife will be allowed to go back to working as a barrister, a panel ruled yesterday .
James Allen QC was dismissed by the Lord Chief Justice after being convicted of common assault following a trial last June.
The father-of-two and his wife, deputy coroner Melanie Williamson, had both falsely claimed bruising and facial swelling were self-inflicted.
He spent £76,000 on legal fees trying to beat the charge, and was later expelled by his chambers, the Bar Standards Board heard.
His lawyer told the hearing he now wanted to rebuild his career as a barrister in the North East.
Suspending him for three months with an order to pay £675 costs, Judge Paul Collins said the financial losses Allen had already suffered were 'not insignificant even for a successful member of the bar.'
“Mr Allen has already been heavily punished for assaulting his wife,” he said.
“These are very high burdens for any member of the bar, and must bear very heavily on him indeed.
“In those circumstances, Mr Allen is not to be punished a second time for things he has already been punished for.
“Taking into account he has already paid a very high financial penalty, and has been prevented from practising, the tribunal considers it would be appropriate to pass a very short period of suspension.
“That makes it very clear the tribunal takes a serious view of the offence, and has marked it in a way which is appropriate.'
The assault took place at the couple's home in Wakefield on February 20, 2010, after a caller rang 999 and claimed Allen was “trying to kill” his wife.
Medical experts later testified that the injuries she sustained could not have been self-inflicted.
Following the trial at Bradford Magistrates' Court, District Judge Daphne Wickham handed Allen a 12-month supervision order and said he had “lost his temper and snapped at a difficult time”.
Allan qualified as a barrister in 1973 and then practised in Leeds as a specialist in insolvency, company, and property law, before being appointed an assistant crown court recorder, a part-time judge, in 1989.
He was appointed to the High Court's Chancery Division in 2000, and was also made a Deemster of the High Court of the Isle of Man in 2008.
In written defence submissions put before the panel, Anton Lodge QC said his client had chosen not to attend the central London hearing in order to avoid being photographed by the press.
“His concern is for the well being of his two children were there to be any further publicity,” he said.
“There was considerable intrusive publicity during the trial, and this has had a harmful effect on the children, particularly on the daughter.”
Recounting the background to the assault, he said the former judge was “tired after a long drive the day before from Scotland with the children.
“He had been busy with the children on the Saturday morning and had to work and prepare for going away on the Sunday.
“He was irritated by the long time the help had been talking to his wife. An argument ensued, and he decided to leave the house.
“She did not want him to go and tried to stop him.
“He snapped at a difficult time, and struck his wife at least three times.”
The barrister added the marriage between Allen and his wife, who have two children aged 11 and seven, remained strong.
He told the panel his client's income had declined substantially since his conviction, and he would never be employed as a judge again.
“He would like to come back to the bar simply because he has confidence he can make a valued contribution to lay and professional clients in the North East,” he said.
Allen, of Woolley, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, admitted professional misconduct bringing the profession into disrepute.
A separate charge, of engaging in conduct discreditable to a barrister, was left to lie on file.
PETER HITCHEN ON UNACCOUNTABLE POLITICIANS, JUDGES AND LAWYERS VIDEO
UK'S MASONIC JUDICIAL MAFIA THREATEN 87 YR OLD ACTIVIST WITH PSYCHIATRIC GULAG
HER MAJESTY'S FREEMASON LEGAL THUGS THREATEN 87 YEAR OLD POLITICAL ACTIVIST TO BE SECTIONED INTO ONE OF HER
Norman Scarth one of the oldest and most respected political activists has once again been threatened
under the mental health act to be incarcerated inside one of the UK's many psychiatric gulags
for political dissidents. Norman's CRIME? to try and capture on video what these mobsters get
up to in secret star chamber courts. We witnessed the events in Leeds when around 8 thug cops escorted a frail defender of truth and justice.
The shameful long term persecution of a man who won single handedly an action against the British governments failure on human rights show the lengths they will go to silence those, like Norman , prepared to fight against their ongoing tyranny.
MORE CLIPS FROM THE CAMPAIGN FOR TRUTH AND JUSTICE PROTEST IN LONDON VIDEO
LEVESON INQUIRY: LEVESON DON'T FORGET THE CORRUPT JUDGES
Dear Lord Puttnam,
We understand you to have said "Leveson has uncovered a banana republic: CORRUPT PRESS,
CORRUPT POLICE, CORRUPT POLITICIANS." Please forgive me for pointing out a most
important omission from your list - CORRUPT JUDGES! Could it be you are unaware
that such creatures exist? I can assure you they do - in very large numbers!
The so-called 'News Media' (along with Government & Parliament) leads the populace in worshipping them as Gods. Could it be that they have succeeded in brainwashing even you into believing this?
In fact they are the GODFATHERS of the Legal/Judicial Mafia, which operate the most successful Protection Racket in the world. If it is evidence that you want, I can provide you with volumes, as can many others. The persecution inflicted on me by this Mafia started 17 years ago, increasing after I stood for Parliament (1997) & published the book 'CAUSE for CONCERN', & even MORE so after my single-handed success in the European Court of Human rights. Far from decreasing as I get older, the persecution is increasing (& become more blatant!) to the extent that, AT THE AGE OF EIGHTY SIX I have been forced to flee the land of my birth - THE LAND FOR WHICH I FOUGHT IN WORLD WAR II - & seek asylum abroad! I HOPE you will want to know more.
The Leveson Inquiry is a smoke screen, to take people's mind off what is INFINITELY worse. NS
UK JUDICIARY GUILTY OF CRIMINAL ACTS
IMAGES AND VIDEO'S WILL BE ADDED SHORTLY
John Hemming MP opens 2-week demo at Royal Courts of Justice
The Campaign for Truth and Justice is staging a demonstration every day from 9.30am to 4.30 to, once again, highlight the plight of victims of miscarriges and perversion of justice.
On its home page, the Campaign spells out in general terms what Victims Unite publishes by way of Cases as Stories: unlawful imprisonments, human rights abuses, fraudulent bankruptcies and child snatching as the tip of an iceberg of white collar crimes, where the Judiciary covers up the crimes committed by public authorities such as the NHS, Local Councils, their legal teams and Social Services.
John Hemming MP has ample experience with parents whose children were taken: he says that the evidence is that about half of his over 1,600 cases on file are unreliable. In 2006, 200 such parents ended up as Secret Prisoners, for they are convicted in secret family courts. But it can be worse: their are secret prisoners whose legal capacity to decide has been removed from them by the Court of Protection – only to defraud them of their wealth and assets. John Hemming MP will join the demonstrators around 3.30pm.
Caul Grant, the founder of the Campaign, lost his son to the negligence of the NHS. But since he didn’t get any acknowledgement or apologies, he felt compelled to provoke the system and eventually got falsely imprisoned for six and a half years, which he used to study the law. As a result, he has been successfully representing himself as a Litigant in Person, which many victims have to revert to, given the corruption they experience among the legal profession.
Evidence can be found on Solicitors from Hell as well as under Legal Mafia Evidence on Victims Unite.
As a self-help measure in the absence of the Rule of Law, the Association of McKenzie Friends was launched on 6th March 2012, to assist Litigants in Person, especially when they end up as innocent prisoners. Besides John Hemming MP, Austin Mitchell MP supported the event and offered to write to all Members of Parliament.
However, this turned out to uncover more challenges:
McKenzie Friends of Litigants in Person ought to have legal visits in prison to take papers in and out, but have been refused in HMP Pentonville, HMP Holloway and HMP Cardiff.
Similarly, McKenzie Friends were not allowed to speak to the prisoners in court cells in preparation of hearings.
Prisoners such as Maurice J Kirk BVSc, Bishop Gloria Musa and Reverend Joseph Musa are held as political prisoners, with varying sheets of charges, questions over MAPPA registration (classification as terrorists as dangerous as the top5% of the population) and the complete impossibility to defend adaequately from inside.
Instead of prisoners being treated as “innocent until proven guilty”, they are experiencing seriously bad treatement such as being called “black monkey” and “black criminals” as well as physical assault, refusal of bail on the most spurious of grounds and restrictions of telephone and mail that cannot relate to either the Rule of Law, justice, human or prisoners’ rights.
The Association of McKenzie Friends is thus supporting the demo, especially on the day that the Musas whose six children were taken in April 2010, will ask for an adjournment. Their latest legal representation was, once again, far from representing the couple’s interests, let alone those of the children. Christopher Booker wrote already in December 2010 in The Telegraph:
“A council whistleblower has said that, at a recent case conference, the social workers admitted that maybe they had made a mistake, and that the mother they had falsely accused was in fact devoted and blameless. But apparently, because of “press interest” in the case, the officials agreed that the council could not afford the very damaging publicity which might follow if the unhappy children were reunited with their parents. It was therefore vital that the council should continue to justify its actions.”
The Musas are listed to be heard in Court 68 at 2 o’clock, before Lady Justice Black.
For further information, please contact Sabine K McNeill on 07968 039 141.
JUDICIAL MAFIA ONLY HAPPY WITH CAMERA'S WHEN NOT FLEECING THE PUBLIC VIDEO
The judicial mafia have decided to allow camera's in Scottish court. Selectively only when they are sending
down murderers so they look good . They don't want camera's catching them thieving vast swathes
of mens land, business, property and especially children in civil courts that still require secrecy
to avoid the scrutiny of the billions looted in their dens of inquity.
WHO GAVE THEM THE POWER TO DECIDE WHETHER CAMERA'S SHOULD BE IN COURT OR NOT?
THEMSELVES, WHEN THOSE COURTS ARE OUR COURTS AND IT IS ONLY FOR THE PUBLIC TO DECIDE, WHEN THEY ARE
MEMBERS OF A JURY, THAT FILMING IS OF PARAMOUNT IMPORTANCE AS TO WHAT THESE EVIL BASTARDS GET UP TO BEHIND CLOSED
To truly describe what men are going through across the planet daily, thanks to the judicial mafia, is extremely
difficult but these robbing bastards are the ultimate terrorists and only exist because they have given
themselves powers they don't really possess, but would fool us into believing they have the final say in where
all our hard earned assets ends up. The psychology of how courts operate is why more men die each year
than all other types of accidents or wars and regularly covered up by the media they also control. So how do
they murder men en masse?
1. Debt is the starting point to the methods used to drive men into an early grave and then steal their estates.
Their lackeys the lawyers instigate ever increasing legal bills to the point were they merely add another '0' to
each recurring bill until £1,000 turns to £10,000 turns to £100,000 and for any man who has diligently paid his
debts this alone is enough to drive many decent men over the edge.
2. Meanwhile as they manufacture mounting legal bills they also do the same for an ex-wife and what many
men fail to realise is that they will also be forced to pay that legal bill as well. In divorce a women's legal aid
funded lawyer will run up huge costs like there is no tomorrow with the rubber stamp approval of crooked
judges and legal aid boards in the knowledge that a man's estate will be stripped to pay for all their massive
abuse of the legal process.
3. Meanwhile, as all of the other pressures are mounting, they will constantly threaten men with the removal of
their children for good and extra efforts are put into this form of torture as it is the children were crooked
lawyers can run up massive legal aid claims on the back of allegations of abuse and violence. There are
already lawyers who have been caught manufacturing lies that later proved they had run up massive bills on
the back of vile allegations against fathers. These alone would be enough to push any good man over the
edge. All of this rubber stamped by judges in secret hearings that are supposed to protect the child but in fact
allows freemasonry within the judiciary to destroy men and their families not part of their deviant and satanic
power and control.
4. Meanwhile, as all of the above aren't enough , men will be threatened almost immediately with homelessness
if they own their property and many men have found within weeks of separating having to look for a roof over
their head and the finance to fund the rent as so much will be eaten up with legal bills leaving many penniless ,
a common outcome of the vile machinations of the law that daily are killing men under the radar of a complicit
While they pile on the debt pressure you will also find your credit rating goes out of the window
as the same mob control the flow of credit and credit agencies. Try getting a place to stay when your marked
down as a bad risk?
5. If like many men you decide to fight these bastards you will also see a sudden increase in investigations by a
myriad of agencies all connected through freemasonry. Power companies will start demanding huge increases
in bills that in many cases are mistakes. Councils will suddenly start hitting you for taxes that are also errors.
The tax man may start investigating every single financial transaction that has taken place in your life for the
last 20 years or more.
Banks will also start charging interest on transactions that never happened. Even the BBC may hit you with
three or more licence fees when you may no longer own a house of any description. Agencies connected with
benefits or pensions will suddenly stop paying out while under investigation, leaving men in dire straits and
with all of the above severe depression .
Regular visits by thug cops will only add to the pressure as well as a constant stream of legal papers delivered
by sheriff officers who will steal your children and property at the behest of judicial orders.
Even family doctors may not help during this time as they suddenly come on board with the ex wife's lawyer
providing dodgy reports in favour of their case and without any thought as to the mounting pressure caused
when all of the above start operating together.
6. These are only some of the ploys used by the legal mafia that politicians are turning a blind eye to as they all
eat out of the trough in the massive theft of land, business and property that sees trillions being wiped off of
the estates of men and into the coffers of the devious bastards hell bent on continuing the mass fleecing of the
male population under the guise of the 'LAW'. A law that only serves the self interest and financial enrichment
of all who know the secrets of how to dupe men of their worldly possessions, and in many cases their lives.
Only a uniting of men globally will stop these thieving bastards from their crimes against humanity. While
exposing their methods we are challenging at every opportunity those who think this system will carry on ad
infinitum but NOT if we can help it.
AUSTRALIA'S JUDICIAL TYRANNY AND THE CROOKS SELECTED FOR OFFICE
Notorious Queensland Bar Association is the only , exclusive and monopolistic pool of individuals
from which Queensland ' judges ' are selected . ( what is the case in any other state or country ? )
Consequently , a certified crook and a liar one day can become ' fair ' , ' just ' and ' honest ' person
the very next day - HOW ? - using Mary Poppins trick , just click your fingers and voila - a saint appears .
( No wonder that guys in Vatican are so jealous - for them it takes at least several years
to make a saint out of a mortal ! )
Mary Poppins is a fairy tale for children but selection of unsuitable people as the ' judges '
is the sad reality for people in Queensland and as the result :
- tradition of ' kangaroo courts ' is maintained instead of fair and just court proceedings
- criminally minded mafia members interests are protected instead of interests of the society
on which behalf those ' judges ' are supposed to operate
- corruption and rottenness of the ' legal system ' is deepened
16 ITALIAN JUDGES ARRESTED IN BIG ANTI-MAFIA OPERATION IN NAPLES
IF ONLY BRITISH COPS WERE AS DILIGENT AT ARRESTING THE CROOKS RUNNING BRITISH COURTS
Italian police have arrested 16 judges in what they say is a big anti-mafia operation centred on Naples.
They are alleged to have taken bribes to issue financial rulings in favour of the Camorra, the crime syndicate active around the southern city.
Altogether about 60 people are being held on suspicion of money laundering and corruption.
Buildings, cars and property worth 1bn euros (£829m; $1.3bn) were seized around Naples and in northern Italy.
The names of the detained 16 judges have not been revealed.
The police said the focus of the operation was the Fabroccino clan, which is believed to have bribed officials to obtain favourable court judgements.
The clan has become notorious for extortion and drug trafficking, but the police say they are also investigating its involvement in buying and selling property, hotel management and the food industry.
The authorities clearly believe that the corruption has spread far beyond the members of the clan itself, and that in this case even judges may have been working with the Camorra, the BBC's Alan Johnston in Rome reports.