FAMILY COURTS 10

GOOGLE'S ERIC SCHMIDT FACES WORLD'S SECOND MOST EXPENSIVE DIVORCE
eric schmidt Gents,

Many of you would have heard by now that Eric Schmidt, head of Google for many years and one of the worlds richest men faces divorce.

Talk about instant KARMA.

This man has known about the criminality of the family courts since October 2010 when I sent him a lawful notice to cease and desist removing my court room video. The video has remained since then so we know SOMEONE at Google read the lawful notice. ASIO have been running hate sites about me and Eric (or Erics representative) also took down that hate site when asked. However he did not meet his lawful obligations in passing to me all information he had available as to the perpetrators of the hate site so Eric will stand trial for that. I also asked Eric, Sergy and Brin, as some of the worlds wealthiest men, to make a small donation to help other men. I asked for the SAME donation that I have put in which is USD500,000. I would not ask a man to do more than I have done myself. Of course, USD500K was EVERYTHING I OWNED and for these three men it is peanuts. Quite literally. Well? If Eric had helped me these last 15 months he would NOT be facing this divorce. It could not happen to a nicer man, eh? Astoundingly wealthy and turned his back on his fellow brothers.

So I am going to write an open letter to Eric where I will make all this plain to him and offer to handle his case for him. I will also point out to Larry, Sergy and Mark Zuckerberg that they could be in this situation themselves one day. And as fabulously wealthy men they are turning their backs on their fellow men in great need. I think it is time we denounced those men of fabulous wealth who have refused to break the story of the criminality of the family courts. Please pass this email as far and wide as you can so others know the lawful notice to Eric is coming.

Best Regards
Your brother Peter
  • Living Free in a Fem-Nazi World - ebook Peter Nolan
  • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: THE ONLY EXCUSE REQUIRED TO WIPE YOU OUT
    There are literally millions of decent guys across the globe experiencing a phenomena that has stealthily risen like some evil serpent from the deep and with the same venomous sting as a pit full of vipers. Wherever there is an allegation of domestic violence there will be a crooked lawyer milking the legal aid system while supporting what formerly may have been the lovely wee lady you married but who has been turned into a toxic gold digging troll by forces that are setting out to destroy your very life essence, meantime helping themselves to your hard earned assets.

    But it is MUCH MUCH worse when the state(controlled totally by a freemasonic tyranny) has been funding, through an endless money pot of legal aid, lawyers to accuse men of the most heinous crimes ensuring, while they are distracting and threatening you with court orders, they are busily combing the earth for every last detail of your worth and meticulously wiping you out for the advancement of a sinister satanic control network. A network that feeds off of hard working men and to satisfy the greed and avarice of the secret societies protecting the ruling establishment who are making up laws to help themselves to any one's property not part of their creepy perverted tyranny.

    They need EXCUSES to destroy men on a grand scale hence the endless propaganda created by a compliant media that smears men as abusers and wife beaters to guarantee NO ONE will stop the TROUGH they all feed out of, meanwhile destroying the men who are caught up in the BIGGEST WAR OF ALL. The myriad of unseen terrorists are a great distraction from the REAL terrorists and stalkers who use the 'LAW' to plunder trillions every day and the recent figures, and these are very difficult to come by, show one small country Scotland has a calculated value of £263,000,000,000 for its housing stock and that lawyers , bankers and judges have a COMPLETE monopoly over the buying and selling ( or more often repossession [theft] ) of property and has led to the biggest heist in history that is seldom documented by their media pals. A media who just happen to get the advertising revenue when homes are regurgitated in a merry go round of selling and stealing that goes on regularly under most of their victims radar.

    Fortunately we have been archiving their evil empire with some unbelievable instances were those allegations came back to haunt the very perpetrators leading to their demise.

    Quote "In Scotland's biggest-ever legal aid fraud, James Muir made false claims for public money in hundreds of child protection cases over seven years fraudulently obtaining nearly £2 million. James Muir had a niche market, being the only dedicated children's lawyer in the area. All the children existed in his claims, but he made up the grounds of referral from the Children's Reporter and they all, in effect, became sex abuse cases. This allowed him to embellish claims and increase the amount paid. Details of the case have been kept secret for two years while the Scottish Government's civil recovery unit sought to reclaim the money from his estate. From 1999 until 2005, he made false claims for legal aid in several hundred child welfare cases. He committed suicide after the police began investigating." (a very RARE occasion when Scotland's freemason cops investigate a crooked lawyer).

    So men should be aware this is NOT as they claim an isolated incident . Across the globe similar ALLEGATIONS are being manufactured against separated fathers to satisfy the greed of those prepared to use the legal system to line their pockets and the pockets of all those who feed off of the trillions stripped from good men, who in many cases lost their lives trying to fight some of the most vile accusations while being stalked and terrorized by crooked judges, lawyers, cops and bailiffs part of their satanic network of power. Men need to ignore the false flag terrorism that they hide behind and concentrate on uniting against this tyranny and doing their utmost to protect themselves from something that in time may well come up and bite them when they least expect it. This is the harsh reality of the world we are presently living in is that it is a very unsafe place for men whose relationship may be coming to an end and the main cause of mass suicides of men who like lemmings are throwing themselves off high buildings like there is no tomorrow due to this most serious threat to men outside a world war. If the articles below can't convince you of the real threats and dangers men are facing then NOTHING WILL.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • LAWYER WHO ACCUSED MEN OF CHILD ABUSE COMMITS SUICIDE AFTER INVESTIGATION STARTED
  • Victim's fury after £18,000 fraud probe lawyer jets off to new life
  • Value of Scotland's private housing stock up £149bn in a decade
  • 'The Law Society is worse than a pit full of vipers'
  • FOURTEEN CROOKED LAWYERS DON'T GET PROSECUTED FOR FIDDLING LEGAL AID
  • Legal Aid officials hid details of dodgy claims scandal as ‘Pay-Up threats’ from £600K legal aid rogue lawyer leaves pensioner, 70, starving, homeless
  • THE LEGAL AID GANGSTERS ON £800K A YEAR
  • Lawyers complicit media promote marriage honey trap
  • Tycoon's mysterious death and an internet bride battling his family over £1.5m fortune
  • LEGAL AID CHIEF ARRESTED WITH RENT BOY IN SHOPPING CENTRE TOILET
  • THE LEGAL AID RACKET THAT IS NEVER TREATED BY COPS OR LEGAL MAFIA AS FRAUD
  • Legal Aid officials hid details of dodgy claims scandal as ‘Pay-Up threats’ from £600K legal aid rogue lawyer leaves pensioner, 70, starving, homeless
  • SHAMED LAWYER STAYS OUT OF COURT DESPITE ADMITTING £221,000 OF BOGUS CLAIMS
  • Law Society protects legal aid fraudster lawyers from criminal charges
  • £1.1m earnings in a year for top legal aid barrister
  • £500,000 lawyer tops legal aid fatcat league
  • Biggest legal aid fraud repaid
  • Lawyer banned from legal aid work
  • Legal aid bill increases to £150m
  • 20 lawyers convicted of defrauding Legal Aid
  • Solicitor's £325,000 legal aid fraud
  • Lawyer's clerk convicted on massive legal aid fraud returns
  • UK Legal aid bill 'highest in world'
  • Jo Yeates's parents speak of their anger over killer's legal aid that could cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands
  • THE REAL CAUSE OF MANY DIVORCES: PERIMENOPAUSE
    IF YOU ARE A MAN MARRIED TO A WOMAN REACHING PERIMENOPAUSE OR FULL MENOPAUSE YOU MAY FIND YOURSELF IN THE DIVORCE COURTS ACCUSED OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TO COVER UP HER PSYCHOLOGICAL BEHAVIOUR AND TO ENSURE HER LAWYERS GET A LARGE PIECE OF 'YOUR' ESTATE. ONE OF THE MOST COMMON CAUSES OF DIVORCE AN UNDIAGNOSED HEALTH ISSUE THAT CROOKED JUDGES AND LAWYERS IGNORE AT THEIR PERIL AND SELDOM MENTIONED IN DIVORCE PAPERS.

    I won't let the menopause defeat me: Loose Women's Lisa Maxwell on rages at her partner and how she's terrified she's losing her sex appeal

    We'd just got into bed when I started shivering, convinced the temperature in the bedroom had dropped dramatically. Hardly a big deal, but that’s not how I saw it. ‘What the hell’s wrong with the heating?’ I demanded. My partner, Paul, shrugged: ‘Since when have I been a plumber?’ This was a red rag to a bull. ‘Don’t be facetious,’ I snarled. ‘I want to know what’s wrong.’ ‘Maybe you turned the radiator off,’ said Paul. ‘I didn’t. Did you?’ I snapped. ‘What going on?’ By now, Paul was beginning to lose his patience.

    We ended up having an enormous row, then Paul, my partner of 14 years, stormed off to sleep in the spare room, and I slammed the door behind him. Still I couldn’t back down. ‘That’s right. You take the warm bedroom,’ I bellowed through the walls. The awful thing is that, even while I was ranting and raging, I knew I was acting like a woman possessed — but there was nothing poor Paul could say or do to calm me down.

    At the age of 48, I am in the grip of something over which I have absolutely no control — the perimenopause. Technically, the menopause refers to your last-ever period. Hot flushes, mood swings and other typical ‘menopausal’ symptoms are actually part of the perimenopause, which can begin up to ten years before a woman’s periods (finally) stop. Until a few months ago, I didn’t even know the perimenopause existed. And I wouldn’t have wanted to know, because admitting to being perimenopausal was admitting that I am officially getting old.

    Even now, if you dare to suggest my behaviour is down to hormonal blips, I will, in my madder moments, rage at you for being sexist and patronising. The menopause is something that happens to old women, not to women like me — women in our prime who have always been lauded for our glamour and still feel sophisticated, sexy and vibrant. If you admit to being menopausal, it seems to me you become the butt of jokes about batty old women having hot flushes and growing beards. That is why it has taken every drop of my courage to talk about this publicly.

    I’m only writing about something so personal now because I can see that I have been in denial. For almost two years now, I have suffered horrifying mood swings, flying off the handle at the slightest provocation, crying, and making excuses not to go out, because I have felt so exhausted. Paul has been asking me for months to get help and finally, aware that I have been putting our relationship under strain, I have listened to him and visited my doctor, who confirmed that I am approaching the change of life.

    I’m hoping that, if I can be open about what’s happening to me, other women might recognise what’s going on in their own bodies. It’s hard to be precise, but I think my symptoms started about two years ago when, suddenly, I felt as if I was inhabiting the wrong body. I’ve always prided myself on being cheerful and even-tempered. I work hard at being chirpy and funny, and never bring my problems to work as a panellist on the television show Loose Women.

    I think I’ve managed to hide my mood swings from everyone there, but it has to come out somewhere and poor Paul took the full brunt of them when I started lashing out at him for the slightest thing. Shopping in New York on a family holiday two years ago, Paul wandered off in a department store with our 12-year-old daughter, Beau. I couldn’t see him anywhere, and went mad. When I finally found him, I tore a strip off him then stormed off. Back at our hotel, the argument became so heated that I ended up throwing a slipper at him. Beau stood there, trying to make sense of her usually sane mother’s appalling behaviour.

    Paul was horrified: I knew I was behaving badly, that I was being unreasonable and destructive, but I couldn’t stop myself. I was angry most of the time, and increasingly tearful. Fatigue became another major problem. Even after 14 hours of sleep, I felt tired.

    For months and months, I blamed my volatile behaviour on everything from lack of sleep, to stress. But, deep down, I knew that wasn’t it. I live in a beautiful home in the Cotswolds with a man I adore and a daughter we cherish. I have a wonderful job, and I’ve never suffered from the adverse effects of stress. I have been in showbusiness for more than 30 years, after landing my first acting role when I was 11. Even when I was working on The Bill — I played DI Sam Nixon for eight years until I left in 2009 to join Loose Women — I’d often turn up, be given pages of new dialogue to learn in 30 minutes, and still be on set without batting an eyelid.

    But by last year, my moods were getting considerably worse, and it was Paul who finally forced me to face what was going on. He couldn’t understand why someone he loved, and who loved him, would behave in such an unreasonable way, so he decided to do some research. In the summer, he looked up my symptoms on the internet, then told me he thought I might be going through the change of life.

    Predictably, I was furious. ‘I’m far too young,’ I snapped. He was only trying to help: why couldn’t I be grateful, instead of raging at him? I was in a planning meeting for Loose Women in September when the subject of the menopause came up. Someone — I think it was Carol Vorderman — mentioned the perimenopause as a possible programme idea. My ears pricked up and as everyone started talking about the symptoms, I ticked them off in my head. Mood swings, exhaustion, forgetfulness — I had them all.

    I’ve never liked going to the doctor, so instead I started to keep a diary of my unstable behaviour, writing it down every time I acted out of character. I realised that the moods seemed to be at their worst a few days before my period, and also immediately after it. Since I’ve never suffered from pre-menstrual syndrome (PMS), it came as a shock to realise that my hormones could be causing me so many problems. In the past, when other menopausal women talked about lying in bed all day with a hot water bottle and crying, I would roll my eyes impatiently because I didn’t understand what they were going through.

    Even now I struggle to accept being associated with a condition which to me has such grim connotations as the menopause. So this week I took a deep breath as I walked into my GP’s surgery. I knew I had to do it, if for no other reason than I felt I owed it to Paul to seek help. My doctor has confirmed that my symptoms — which include mood swings, insomnia, painful periods for the first time in my life and tearfulness — are almost certainly likely to be caused by the perimenopause.

    I am now awaiting the results of blood tests which will assess my hormone levels. I have an appointment with a gynaecologist next week, then I’ll need to weigh up all my options. I may need a course of Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT), which obviously has its downsides, but at this stage, I’m willing to consider anything. Meanwhile, I am trying to come to terms with the emotional consequences of entering the next stage of life. I am sure most older women will have found it difficult to say goodbye to their younger, more fertile selves. The thought of never again being able to bear a child is painful, even if your own family is complete.

    Don’t get me wrong, I feel incredibly lucky to have Beau, but though Paul and I would have dearly loved more children, it wasn’t to be. We met at a party in London when I was 32 and at one of the lowest points in my life. I’d just come back from a disastrous three years in Los Angeles where I’d been offered the role of Daphne Moon in Frasier but then lost it over a daft misunderstanding with the producers. I was struggling with all that when I met Paul, who is tall and blond and like a young Robert Redford. We talked all night, and I knew straight away that he was The One. I’d never wanted children before meeting him, but he quickly convinced me we would make great parents. I fell pregnant with Beau with great ease and being a mother to her has been utterly joyful. But sadly, even though we dearly wanted to give her a sibling, it never happened.

    I fell pregnant twice, in 2008, when I was in The Bill, but I miscarried both babies. That was a heartbreaking time and I felt like a terrible failure. I thought I’d dealt with the fact I would never have more children, but only last week I had a strange dream about being forced to have a termination, and woke up sobbing. I can only think that facing this next phase of my life has forced me to address this all over again as it now seems more official that I won’t have any more children. So, one element of my emotional struggle is about me as a mother; the other is about me as a woman. Admitting that I’m perimenopausal means admitting that I am not as sexy as I once was. At 43, Paul, a sculptor, is five years younger than me and still a fantastically sexy, attractive man. Other women check him out all the time, and I don’t want him to feel he’s shackled to an old granny.

    When you’ve prided yourself on being fancied by your partner and he’s always saying you’re fantastic and that he has no reason to play away from home, you want to try to maintain that. All this has made me realise that life can be dreadfully unfair to women. We spend our best years beating ourselves up about jobs, children and relationships, then finally we reach a stage where we’re happy in our own skins. Once we have reached our 40s we are confident and very aware of what we want out of life. Then, out of nowhere, we get thwacked by the dreaded menopause, and in my case, start behaving like a madwoman.

    Well, I for one, am not going down without a fight. But I do wish I’d faced reality earlier. I’ve put Paul, Beau and all the other people I love through hell because I couldn’t acknowledge what was happening or get medical help. The menopause comes to us all, but for a lot of women it’s a secret we don’t talk about. We’re scared of ageing. We’re terrified our partners won’t fancy us, and that our workmates won’t take us seriously. I can’t say that I’ve finally embraced the ageing process, but I’m determined to prove that the perimenopause will not get the better of me or damage the people I hold dear.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Anger brings women no closer to parity
  • The feminist police state robs men of their wealth and their children
  • FAMILY LAW DESIGNED TO DESTROY (NON-MASON) MEN
    Social services and law are populated by women indoctrinated in Women's Studies to regard men, marriage and families as oppressive and evil. This is but one front in a general covert war against society waged by the Illuminati. "Viking," an Australian, relates how his life was destroyed.
    by "Viking" (henrymakow,com)

    I have met dozens of men in Asia who have escaped the vicious maw of the Family Law system. Some have been impoverished by ex-wives and girlfriends who, out of sheer vindictiveness, have taken all their money. I know of men who are still being hounded by the system though their children are well past majority age. I know men who have been chased for years for paternity payments, even though they have DNA tests that prove they are not the fathers.

    I know men who spend a great deal of time in jail because they can't find work, since they are now ex-cons, and so can't meet the support payments, which lands them back in jail...again and again and again. I know men who pay outrageous sums of money every month to support children they are forbidden to see. They are buried under a mountain of restraining orders and other legal rubbish for no reason other than a vindictive female judge and a wicked ex-wife.

    CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES

    Part of the Family Law system is a...how do I put this politely...thing called Child Protective Services (or any of a dozen other equally benign names.) This vile and deleterious organization is nothing more than a band of legal kidnappers and slave traders. It thrives on a system that pays 'foster parents' to 'care' for children they have kidnapped from the rightful family. These 'foster parents' care little about the children and many offer horrid and squalid conditions in order to collect the state payments. The children are tortured and abused in ways that make many of the worst abusers look mild by comparison. With the children as hostages, the Family Law system can extract any amount of concessions from the natural parents, who are desperately trying to get their children back. This horrible demeaning system beats down human beings and creates emotional basket cases.

    MY HORRID EXPERIENCE

    Let's take an example of someone I know. His story is so horrific that he is still recovering nearly 10 years later. We'll call him Paul. Paul came home from work one day to find his house completely cleaned out, lock, stock and barrel, and his wife and three children vanished. Her cell phone number had been changed, as had the numbers of her friends that he knew. The only person he could contact was the father-in-law, who railed at Paul for what he had done to the wife. Paul was mystified, not sure what that meant. On the kitchen counter, he found the case number and contact for a police investigator in the spouse abuse division.

    Paul couldn't fathom what was going on. He had never abused his wife, and in fact had spent years trying to get his wife help for abuse she had suffered at the hands of her mother and step-family. As it was Friday, Paul had to wait until Monday to contact the investigator. When he did, he was informed that the wife had accused him of beating her. Paul was shocked, to say the least.

    At lunch, he went to the police station to talk with the investigator. He was told the his wife had several serious injuries and had accused Paul of beating her the previous Thursday between 7am and 7 30 am. Paul wrote out his statement, and when he returned to the office, he collected key card records, computer log-on files, email and phone records which showed conclusively that he was sitting at his desk at this time. The investigation concluded that there was no possible way for Paul to have beaten the wife, and he later found out that she had tried changing her story a couple of times to match what she thought was Paul's testimony.

    HARASSMENT

    Nevertheless, the Family Law system investigated Paul's every breath. They took his school records, job history, driving record, tax filings...everything public record they could dig up. They forced him into psycho-therapy and dozens of useless classes and help groups. He went along with all of it in the desperate hope of getting his children back, who by now had been spirited away to some 'foster' home for months without contact of any kind. Despite having combed through Paul's life with a fine-tooth comb, they found nothing but a couple of hundred dollars in unpaid taxes from 10 years before. This didn't stop them from putting him through sheer hell. They loaded him down with insipid classes and therapy sessions, and dragged him to court once or twice a week for pointless hearings. They drug tested him and visited his house on a regular basis to see what he was up to. Paul was fired from his job because he spent more time jumping through hoops than sitting at his desk. He had already spent more than a quarter million dollars defending himself from nothing, trying to get his children back. Without a cent and no job, the vultures smelled blood and pounced.

    Paul's own sister, a lesbian and a 'social worker,' had taken the children by now. She saw an opportunity to take the children from Paul, since she was never going to have any by natural means. She sided with CPS and the Family Law system and finally forced Paul to make a horrible choice: either go to trial without a lawyer and risk losing the children forever, or accept joint custody with his sister. He would have visitation 'rights' and would have to pay support based on his income from his last job. He was making well over $100,000/year when he was employed. They were going to stick him with support payments of $4,000/month...with no job and absolutely no resources left. Paul saw the writing on the wall. They were salivating at the prospect of throwing him in jail within months for non-payment. His only option was to sign away his 'parental rights.' Mind you, this is all while his children were being held incommunicado, which means he was under about as much duress as a man could be. Paul signed.

    Immediately, his sister got a restraining order and refused to let him see his children. He bounced around trying to find work and doing freelance projects. His life was completely wrecked and he was on the verge of becoming a full-blown alcoholic trying to drown the pain and anger he felt.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • JOHN CLEESE GETS IT SPOT ON ABOUT DIVORCE
    John Cleese wrote a book with a psychologist and married psychotherapist Alyce Faye Eichelberger; he then had a famously acrimonious (and expensive) divorce from her, raising money by going on what he called, heavy-handedly, the How To Finance Your Divorce tour.

    ‘I’m here, my friends, because frankly I need the money,’ he said at the world premiere in Oslo. ‘I’ve fallen on hard times. I’m having to pay $20 million to a woman who I believe is the special love child of Bernie Madoff and Heather Mills . . . To comfort me, my lawyer told me to imagine how much I would have had to pay if Alyce had contributed anything to the relationship — such as children or a conversation.’

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • CHILD'S RIGHT TO SEE AN ABSENT FATHER: LAW TO HELP MILLIONS FROM BROKEN HOMES
    Government to draw up radical changes to the 1989 Children's Act
    £10m will be pledged to help couples settle out of court
    Figures show one in five children lose contact with a parent after separation

    Millions of children from broken homes are to be granted new rights to a 'full and continuing relationship' with both their parents.

    The move is designed to ensure that the parent who leaves the family home – most commonly the father – cannot be cut out of their children's lives following an acrimonious separation. Ministers have decided that a change in the law is vital in the face of heartbreaking evidence that huge numbers of youngsters whose families split up lose contact with one parent for ever.

    Courts will be put under a duty to ensure that unless their welfare is threatened by staying in touch with either their mother or father, children have an 'equal right to a proper relationship with both'. Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith and Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg have dismissed objections from Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke and overturned the findings of a major review of family law which was published last year. On Monday, the Government will announce a ministerial working group that will draw up radical changes to the 1989 Children Act. The Act states that the child's needs come first in law courts, but campaigners for fathers' rights complain that judges repeatedly pander to the idea that mothers are 'more important' than fathers.

    Unmarried fathers say they are often at a particular disadvantage, having to apply for a 'parental responsibility order' through a court or have one granted through an agreement with the mother. 'The Act is going to be rewritten,' said a Government source. 'The welfare of children must of course remain paramount – but alongside that there will be an equal right for a child to have a proper relationship with both parents. 'There should be no inbuilt legal bias towards the father or mother, and where there are no welfare issues, we want to see this principle reinforced through law.

    'This is about children. We want to be clear that both parents should have a full and continuing role in their children's life after a separation.' Ministers will pledge £10million for mediation services to encourage more couples to settle their disputes out of court. Children's Minister Tim Loughton says: 'The courts are rarely the best place for resolving private disputes about the care of children. That's why we want to see greater use of mediation to solve parental disputes out of court.

    'It is also right that we continue to encourage fathers to take responsibility as equal parents and to be fully involved with their children from the outset.' The decision overturns the main finding of a family justice review, conducted for the Ministry of Justice by businessman David Norgrove, which was published in November. It concluded that giving fathers shared or equal time, or even the right to maintain a meaningful relationship with their children, 'would do more harm than good'.

    The proposals immediately sparked a Cabinet revolt, led by Mr Duncan Smith and Mr Clegg, who insisted that the law must be amended to strengthen fathers' rights. Official figures show that one in five children from broken homes lose touch with their absent parent, usually their father, within three years and never see them again.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Children win legal right to see both parents after divorce
  • WARNING NOTICE IN CROWN MAGISTRATES COURT
    crown notice
    CCTV CAMERA'S EVERYWHERE EXCEPT THE VERY COURTS
    THAT MET OUT (IN)JUSTICE WITH COMPLETE IMPUNITY
    DAD: DESTROYED AFTER DIVORCE
    THE DIVORCE TRAP

    The vast bulk of the divorce industrial complex is a licence for freemasons to print money. Every arm of the state has been infiltrated and now controlled by satanic psychopaths dressed in fancy suits, robes and regalia , but as they say no matter how you dress a turd, it's still a turd. One of the major driving forces in a man's life is to pass on his genes that is until a bunch of lunatics decided to ensure they will cash in at some point down the line when the partnership dissolves and these vile bastards ensure the law is heavily weighted in favour of the mass plundering of men caught up in the DIVORCE trap.

    The legal mafia that was developed way back in time for the pharaohs to enslave has been finely tuned to give powers to utter scum to covet mens assets under the guise of marriage , then divorce. There are really only one group of people who gain substantially from the divorce industrial complex and that is the ruling elite who ensure their judicial and legal minions always rule in favour of the crown coffers and the many freemasons who feed off the spoils. Divorcing men are being destroyed by these evil bastards like vultures stripping bare their prey.

    Husband's £6m legal bill in divorce fight

    A millionaire businessman who hid his wealth from his ex-wife has been left with a £6 million legal bill after losing a High Court battle. The couple, who cannot be named for legal reasons, had a property empire worth £100 million before the credit crunch. Three years later the husband claimed in court that he had "only £87 in his pocket". But his ex-wife's lawyers found that he was spending up to £15,000 a month on his credit card and more than £2,700 a month renting a flat. Today Mr Justice Bodey ordered the husband to pay another £3.7 million to his ex-wife, bringing her total divorce payout to over £15 million.

    Commenting on the four-year battle, the judge said: "They [legal costs] are now agreed to be nearing £6 million. It's a depressing sum of money. The costs of this long-running saga between a once married couple could amply have paid the £3.7 million now in issue." The judge said the divorce had revealed "an unusual degree of animosity and mistrust" between the couple. The court heard that before 2007 they had received an "indicative offer" to sell their business for £100 million.

    When their marriage collapsed in 2008 their combined wealth came to about £31 million, which they originally agreed to split equally. But a deferred payment to the wife of £4.7 million became the sticking point. In late 2010 the husband claimed he had zero income and was "on the verge of bankruptcy". The judge said the husband narrowly escaped being reported to the Director of Public Prosecutions for hiving off £16 million to Lichtenstein without telling his ex.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • EXPERT WITNESS SCAMMERS THAT DEEPLY AFFECT A FATHER AND HIS CHILDREN
    RUTH COPPARD THESE BASTARDS GET PAID BY CROOKED LAWYERS WHO IN TURN ARE GETTING PAID BY CROOKED LEGAL AID BOARDS WHO IN TURN WILL STEAL A MAN'S HOME TO PAY FOR THE CORRUPTION THAT PASSES FOR FAMILY COURT LAW RUN ON TYRANNY, FRAUD AND CORRUPTION.

    EXPERT WITNESS SCAMS:Child psychologist tried to stop father winning custody of his teenage daughter by falsely claiming he was autistic

    A child psychologist who has featured as an expert on BBC’s Woman’s Hour tried to stop a father winning custody of his teenage daughter by falsely claiming he was autistic, a disciplinary panel was told yesterday. Dr Ruth Coppard told officers involved in family court proceedings that Ian Watson had Asperger’s syndrome, despite having no evidence to back the claim. As well as Radio 4, Coppard has appeared on the Richard and Judy show and featured in other media.

    She was found guilty of misconduct by the Health Professions Council in London yesterday after six out of seven allegations against her were found proved. The panel also ruled that her fitness to practice was impaired. The allegations included informing a family court officer that Mr Watson had Asperger’s syndrome – a form of autism – ‘without providing any evidence to substantiate your conclusion’.

    Coppard, an NHS psychologist who is based in Barnsley, had also diagnosed the teenage girl as having the same autistic spectrum disorder. She made damaging comments about them both in a report commissioned by Mr Watson’s ex-wife in November 2008 and a second report for the family GP four months later. Coppard admitted she ‘crossed the line’ by helping Mr Watson’s former wife and taking her side in the custody dispute.

    She told the hearing: ‘I may have been seduced by the mother’s request, but I really believed it was important for people to understand the extent of her difficulties.’ Mr Watson said he had attended treatment sessions with his ex-wife and daughter but had never himself been assessed for any condition. 'Coppard ‘conducted herself in a manner that fell short of a registered psychologist

    He claimed Coppard’s report misused confidential information, which left his daughter feeling ‘cross and emotional’. ‘I don’t believe at any time in her life she’s going to have the confidence to talk about her feelings with anyone like that again,’ he said. ‘I went there in good faith and revealed my thoughts and feelings. What I said was added to a long list of failings that were mentioned in court as evidence to why I wasn’t fit to have custody of my two children.’ Coppard made the claims about Mr Watson two years after treating his 14-year-old daughter for an eating disorder.

    She even contacted the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service to make sure they took her opinions into consideration. She admitted breaching patient confidentiality, but insisted she believed it was in the teenager’s best interests. She conceded: ‘There are a number of things I should have done differently.’

    Panel chairman Jacki Pearce said Coppard ‘conducted herself in a manner that fell short of a registered psychologist’. She was given an 18-month condition of practice order, which means she will work under supervision and undergo training.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • MORE LEGAL AID SCAMS HERE
  • OCCUPY THE COURTS 20 JANUARY 2012 VIDEO
    HEDGE FUND MANAGERS (FREEMASONS) PAY FOR GOLDDIGGERS DIVORCES
    Shorting on the marriage market: How hedge fund managers gamble on bitter divorce battles

    Investors are gambling on bitter divorce battles between women and their rich husbands in return for a share of the spoils, it has emerged. Venture capitalists, hedge funds and high-end lenders are putting up money to women who want to fight their husbands in court. In return, the investors take a chunk of the court payouts.

    According to The Sunday Times, one company now has loans out to more than 100 'high net worth' spouses - it charges about 20 per cent interest for up-front divorce financing. It is believed the market is growing rapidly, not least because of cuts to the legal aid budget and the credit crunch meaning banks are refusing to lend money. The new trend was highlighted in the High Court last week with Michelle Young, 47, engaged in a huge multi-million pound battle with her husband Scot. Despite Mr Young declaring himself bankrupt, his wife believes the money has been hidden away. The former model told how a backer had agreed to finance her case against Mr Young, who is a fixer for Russian oligarchs and British billionaires. Friends of Mrs Young have told that the firm, which is unidentified, has handed over £3m so far and could make 30 per cent from the divorce case.

    If Mrs Young is awarded the £500m she believes she is due, it could see the firm gain a windfall of up to £150m. Speaking to The Sunday Times, Mrs Young said: I'm very grateful my case is being funded. Without it, I would have been screwed.' Steve Jones, a business development manager for Argent, a barristers' chambers, told of the growing trend: 'Rather than backing stocks and shares, hedge funds are backing litigation, because the returns are good for successful cases. They wouldn't be doing it unless they thought they could make money out of it.'

    In 2010, there were 119,589 divorces in England and Wales which is a rise of nearly 5 per cent on the previous year, according to the Office for National Statistics. But it is the huge profits to be gained at the top end of the divorce market which is resulting in investors looking to cash in.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • PUBLIC MONEY WASTED ON MOTHERS TRYING TO PROVE WHO THEIR BABIES FATHER IS
    dna test Taxpayers are forking out thousands of pounds a year on DNA paternity tests after mothers seeking maintenance wrongly identified the father of their child.

    Last year, around £100,000 went on tests which turned out to be the wrong man because the mother has slept with so many men that she has no idea who the father actually is. Another £250,000 was lost by the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission when men demanded a DNA test to prove they were not the father - but then it turned out that they were, and they nevertheless refused to pay for the test. However, the organisation did manage to recoup £160,000 from men whose paternity was proved by the tests.

    In some cases, the taxpayer pays for multiple tests when the mother is unable to identify one man as the father. There is no limit to the number of tests a person can ask for. The CMES orders around 3,000 paternity tests a year when paternity is contested in child maintenance cases. If the test proves negative, the cost has to be met out of public funds. A source at the organisation said: ‘It’s sad that we need to provide this service in the first place to force people to take responsibility for their children. It’s an ordeal, it costs money and it takes time. ‘Sometimes mothers are unsure who the father is so we have to carry out multiple tests. We have had cases where we have to test as many as three people before finding a match. It’s a lot of money before a case can even be opened.’ A spokesman for the TaxPayers’ Alliance said: ‘It’s important that the Government does everything possible to chase down fathers so they can pay maintenance. ‘But that can’t be providing paternity tests for half the town when the woman has no idea who father of the child is.’

    In 2010/11 there were 3,212 tests taken by alleged fathers disputing paternity, and of these 526 – 16.4 per cent – were negative. There were 112,800 applications made to the Child Support Agency, with paternity contested in around 3 per cent of cases – successfully so in 0.5 per cent of cases.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE

  • A WARNING FOR 2012: THE DIVORCE STALKERS
    The simple fact is more men die each year from legal stalkers than all wars combined. The compliant media would have us believe terrorism is a major threat to men yet ask yourself how many men you know personally that have been affected by terrorism?

    There are men in every town and city across the globe who are being destroyed by the legal mafia , every second of every day, that includes the thousands who die that go unrecognised as to the MAIN cause of their death of men stalked into an early grave by the mobsters that run the 'law', 'courts' and all the other arms of the 'state' that ensure men are being destroyed to satisfy the greed of the royal's assassins who covet men's assets and wealth right across the globe and who use freemason judges to line their pockets. Legal stalking and the vendetta's they create that drive men into an early grave are the most devious psychological ploys that are played out everyday across the globe and orchestrated by the utter scum and dregs of the earth. Globally more assets are redistributed in divorce than all wars combined and the power of the real terrorists , crown controlled judges make all other forms of terrorism pale and provide the smokescreen for what these evil bastards are getting up to, destroying men and their families on a grand scale.

    The power of the British Crown that controls bankers, lawyers and judges ensures Old Lizzie is the richest despot on the planet, yet she is able to separate herself off from the terrifying experiences endured by men daily thanks to the plundering and evil machinations of the law that ensures men are broken and provide easy pickings for the many scumbags that eat from the plate of the royal mafia and her henchmen. The power of a masonic judicial pen is greater than all of the military might and by using the media to constantly smear and attack men gives them ALL the justification they need to strip good men bare fleeced en masse by the masonic thugs who make all other gangsters pale next to their perverted abuse of OUR courts and the 'LAW'.

    Legal aid funded lawyers are paid handsomely by the state to pursue men right across the globe until they are made homeless and penniless, bankrupt and/or commit suicide either with or without their family. The legal aid boards made up of crooked judges and lawyers via the Law Societies turn a blind eye to the massive fraud and corruption that allows the legal mafia to spend endless periods of time pursuing their goal of stripping men of every last bastion of dignity . All of this covered up by a compliant media controlled by the same gangsters who have been getting away with murder until the advancement of information technology. Men should be out on the streets fighting against the legal mafia far more than any other protest over truth and justice as the biggest cause of good men's downfalls are the ease with which the legal mafia can bring us all to our knees and how the global freemason network continues to expand its power base by destroying men not part of their creepy , sinister and dangerous network under the guise of divorce and family law.

    How do we know? and how are we confident of what we are stating in this article? We are their former victims who survived some of the most torturous abuses to be able to get out the message and warn all men globally the potential repercussions of NOT understanding fully what may happen if suddenly your lovely wee wife or partner decides she no longer needs you in her life. There are millions of legal gangsters waiting , especially after Christmas, only to happy to assist, or use her ,to relieve you of all your worldly possessions with NOTHING left to show after many years of sweat and toil.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN HAVE SPENT CHRISTMAS WITHOUT THEIR FATHERS
  • "SINISTER FORCES (MASONIC?) TRIED TO DESTROY MY LIFE" SAYS IAN PUDDICK
  • IAN PUDDICK'S PERSECUTION BY LONDON'S MASONIC MET COPS (VIDEO)
  • OUTRAGEOUS DIVORCE SETTLEMENT WITH MEL GIBSON EXPECTED TO PAY $425m TO EX
  • Widow agrees to return £1.8m legal aid cash falsely claimed by suicide lawyer
  • NO EQUAL RIGHTS FOR FATHERS (VIDEO)
  • JOHN CLEESE SHAFTED BY THE DIVORCE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
  • ANOTHER SAD DAY FOR MEN AS 50/50 PROPERTY CLAIM REJECTED BY JUDICIAL MAFIA
  • COURTS HAVE LOST TOUCH WITH WHAT ARE REASONABLE NEEDS IN DIVORCE
  • DO FATHERS NO LONGER HAVE ANY RIGHTS AT ALL?
  • Legal mafia in favour of camera's in courts BUT NOT the fleecing in family courts
  • FATHERS LOSE BID FOR EQUAL CUSTODY RIGHTS AFTER FAMILY LAW REVIEW
  • DIVORCING IN A 'GENEROUS'(FREEMASON) ENGLISH COURT
  • CROOKED LAWYERS AND THE DIVORCE REGIME
  • £54m DIVORCE FOR AGA KHAN THAT COULD HAVE BEEN £500m
  • FARMERS FEAR OF LOSING ASSETS IN GOLD DIGGING DIVORCES
  • TOP DIVORCE JUDGE USES OWN COURTS TO STIFLE EX-WIFE
  • CSA TO SEIZE MENS HOMES TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT DEBTS(IF NOT ALREADY HOMELESS)
  • THE BIGGEST DIVORCE SETTLEMENT IN HISTORY
  • Berezovsky pays out £100m in UK's biggest divorce settlement
  • HOW THE RICHEST GOLD DIGGER IN HISTORY DECLARES BANKRUPTCY
  • SON AND CARER OF 92 YEAR OLD MOTHER FORCIBLY EVICTED BY JUDGE TO SUIT EX-WIFE
  • Domestic violence has become a huge feminist industry
  • Now WORDS can count as domestic violence as 'emotional abuse' is recognised in legal shake-up
  • Lib Dem legal aid lawyers want to use new DV laws to fleece men
  • WHERE THERE IS A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ALLEGATION THERE WILL BE A LEGAL AID LAWYER MILKING THE SYSTEM
  • THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN HAVE SPENT CHRISTMAS WITHOUT THEIR FATHERS
    A group calling themselves Real Fathers For Justice - thought to be a splinter group of activists Fathers For Justice - is said to be behind the Christmas graffiti attack on Justice Secretary Ken Clarke's home.

    The message daubed messily across his garage doors, and accompanied by half a dozen pictures or so of crying children, reads: 'Fatherless Cristmas'. No, that is not a typo. Whoever sprayed the words missed a quite obvious 'h' from Christmas. Media commentators and online pundits have made much of this error. Ridiculing it, claiming that it sets these people out as rubbish parents and that they 'should return to school before they try to be parents'.

    Perhaps these observers are desperate for laughs amidst the sometime sentimental and sombre festive season or perhaps they really do believe that the error is genuinely telling of the perpetrator's character. Either way, people have not been slow to savage the graffiti-favouring group, labelling them 'ignorant' and 'stupid'. Whoa! Talk about focusing on detail at the detriment of the big picture. The point the vandal was trying to make was that due to Ken Clarke's inaction in reviewing family laws, many thousands of children were without their fathers this Christmas. Yes, it was wrong to break in and vandalise his property, but that reveals the level of desperation some men feel as they are blocked at every turn to see and be with their children. To play a role, no matter how reduced, in the growing life of their child.

    And, yes, clearly the spelling error is embarrassing but it shouldn't negate the very serious message that this graffiti conveys. Personally, I feel it says more about the type of people who focus on grammar rather than the fact that children are in emotionally choppy waters as they continue to be estranged from the paternal end of their DNA equation. We are increasingly living in a fatherless society. That's just fact. Hands up those who know a single parent family led by the mother and whose children have very little real contact with their father?

    We don't need statistics to confirm what is a modern day reality for hundreds of thousands of people - but if we did then here are some to swallow with the Turkey soup. 23 per cent - so that's almost a quarter - of British households with dependent children are headed up by a single parent, of those only 10 per cent (186,000) is a man. In 1971 it was eight per cent of the child population growing up in a single parent family. So, times have clearly changed the face of the traditional family, but the why's and wherefore's of that is for another occasion.

    The issue now is to focus on the fact that the law must be addressed and amended when it comes to children having the legal right to a 'meaningful relationship' with both parents. Of course there are some parents who are dangerous for their children, physically, emotionally or mentally - or a combination of all three - and the child must be protected at all costs. Equally, there are some estranged parents who could not give the proverbial monkey's about their off-spring.

    They prove to be one disappointment after another to their children as they fail to turn up at access times, they avoid contributing maintenance and they promise - but seldom deliver - Birthday or Christmas presents. Parents like this, mothers or fathers, are a disgrace and deserve for their children to treat them with disdain, which they almost certainly will at some stage. However, I tend too think that if a man is prepared to court the type of attention that many fathers groups do in order to highlight their plight, then they are the men who will take their roles seriously.

    Otherwise, why would they fight so long and hard, and place themselves in often physical or legal jeopardy? That wouldn't make sense. I am a single mother to a 14-year-old girl. Her father and I split up when she was three. It was a volatile relationship and we had to separate for our own, and our daughters, sanity and safety. Even though our child and I live 100 miles from her father she visits him and they talk on the telephone regularly.

    That is her right as it is, I believe, every child's right to have access to both parents - if at all feasible. But you wouldn't know that judging by our legal system which is nothing less than punishing towards fathers regardless of whether they are good or poor ones. They are all lumped in the same category ('insignificant') and to hell with the emotional toll it takes on them and the children involved.

    In 2011 it is still overwhelmingly the case that women are given custody of the child - and extraordinary control - when a relationship breaks down and a separation between mother and father occurs. Then, hundreds of thousands of men have to operate at the behest of the 'parent with care' (to adapt a favourite expression of the gob-smackingly useless Child Support Agency) or as they are more commonly known, 'the mother'. I have seen men broken down when excluded from seeing their children. Men who have been accused of heinous acts against their own flesh and blood by vindictive exes, men who work every hour God sends to keep the family home going for wife and child while he camps down on a friend's sofa at night.

    For too long the estranged father has found himself on the receiving end of a mother not always capable of putting the child's needs, including the right to see their father, first. And a legal system that enables that. Like all parents, I have made many mistakes raising our child because it's one of those roles that you learn on the job and you fall down as you go, but blocking my child from having a relationship with her father is not one of them. I have made it my business to drop her at her father's for regular visits as well as always keeping the communication channels open between them both.

    Trust me, in the early days of our separation this was not easy. We were both so angry at the breakdown of our relationship and operated a type of hot and fluid hatred between us. It was an awful time. That said, I am proud to say we have managed to maintain our daughter's relationship with her father, even though he no longer shares the family home. Just as other children, she needs to know that just because mum and dad don't love each other anymore, they have never stopped loving her.

    I consider it to be criminal if a child is prevented from having a 'meaningful relationship' with any of their parents. A fact that our legal establishment needs to rectify for the betterment of society in general, and the fatherless children in particular. So I ask Mr. Clarke that he works, without further delay, to strengthen the role of the father within a child's life and to consider the many thousands of chidren who were kept away from their fathers this Christmas. And that, frankly, is far more of a cause for concern than some dumb spelling mistake.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE