FOR MEN WHO HAVE BEEN, OR ARE BEING, OR WHO MIGHT IN THE FUTURE
BE F*CKED OVER BY MASONS, ZIONISTS OR THE REST OF THE ILLUMINATI
NEW WORLD ORDER MAFIA WHO ABUSE GOOD MEN FOR PROFIT. MUCH OF IT
AIDED BY THE PRESS BARONS IN THE ZIONIST BACKED COMPLIANT MEDIA.
DANGER ZONES FOR MENS HEALTH AND WEALTH
1. Having large sums of money in ANY bank. (They are all con men see
WE TURN THE HOMELESS INTO MILLIONAIRES FOR THE DAY
The X Factor vision of society blames the poor for their predicament
Campers descend on central Paris to highlight plight of homeless
2. Having any kind of mortgage with a bank. (They are all scams see
3. Marrying and signing a state marriage certificate. (Notice NO small print see
4. Having a child. (Maybe the single most dangerous threat to a mans welfare see
5. Entering ANY court especially NO JURY civil courts.(Mason judges make it up see
6. Hiring a lawyer anywhere across the globe. (ALL part of the Bar associations see
7. Trusting any politician.(They are ALL on the take see
9. Taking out any type of credit especially for a large purchase like a car (see
9. Trusting any journalist who answers to the corporate media (see
10. Trusting any cop who answers to masonic superiors (see
11. Allow social workers, lawyers and judges with a homosexual
agenda to dictate
the future welfare of your children (see HERE)
12. Doing any form of business with a FREEMASON. ( ALL of the above included see
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM AND US
THE MOST IMPORTANT PEOPLE ON THIS PLANET ARE THE LEAST IMPORTANT PEOPLE
OR AT LEAST HOW THE PRESS BARONS AND THEIR SCUMBAG JOURNALISTS PORTRAY THEM
We all strive to better ourselves, in our lives and in our children's lives, but
that should NOT be at the expense of others. The ruling mafia have created an underclass
for a number of reasons and would include letting us all know that if we do not
follow their rules we may end up on the streets. Also their mass media propaganda
machine ensures the poor, disabled, vulnerable and sick can be used as a punch bag and
blamed for ALL the ills of the world and have us believe it is the POOR that are
stopping us from bettering ourselves.
This is maybe the most devious lie created by the press barons who
have ensured the sheeple's venom is vented towards those least able to defend
themselves while distracting attention away from the ruling mafia
who live opulent lifestyles and with riches so VAST no one can truly comprehend
how vast that wealth is.
Fortunately the internet is rewriting history and exposing the myths from
a global propaganda machine that is breaking the despicable cycle of deceit and
where a psychological battle has been waged on our minds to ensure we
remain compliant with the ruling elite's demands. We must all re-learn
to respect those who need our sympathy and understanding, not venom, and we
must also be aware that every man facing injustice will allow, in the end, all
men to face that same injustice .
Without fighting for the weakest in our society, while complying with the
ruling mafia's orders, we condone and perpetuate a well orchestrated master plan
that will allow these evil bastards to hold on to power unless our humanity has
a massive wake up call and remove that ruling elite from power
in one way or another. It is only in the interests of the ultra wealthy that this system
can carry on ad infinitum. Everyone else will continue to suffer, as they have
done throughout history, while the ruling mafia carry on their deceitful and
diabolical plans and all part of their new technological world order.
IF YOU THINK YOUR LIFE IS BAD OR MISERABLE IT IS BECAUSE OF THE RICH NOT THE POOR.
The best index to a person's character is how they treat people who can't do them
any good, and how they treat people who can't fight back.
WE PROMOTE PEOPLE THE CORPORATE MEDIA IGNORE AT THEIR PERIL.
WRITTEN FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE HAVE NOTS AS OPPOSED TO THE MASS MEDIA
RUN BY ULTRA-RICH PRESS BARONS LOOKING DOWN AT THE PEASANTS
|COLD RUTHLESS DEVIOUS BASTARDS CONTROL THE EARTH
ONLY FOR THOSE AS YET TO WAKEN UP.
WARNING PSYCHOPATHS IN CHARGE
Super Rich The Greed Game (VIDEO)
Credit crunch? 619,000 millionaires living in Britain rising 17 per cent over the last two years
A third of Britain STILL belongs to the aristocracy
THE CABINET RICH LIST
Pay gap between highest and lowest earners growing faster in Britain than any of the world's richest countries
Do you think the cops are there to protect you from criminals?
Do you think judges are there to give you justice?
Do you think lawyers are there to protect your freedoms?
Do you think legal aid is paid to poor litigants?
Do you think bailiff's act honestly when evicting homeowners?
Do you think social workers are there to protect your children?
Do you think politicians are there to ensure your welfare?
Do you think local authority chiefs are there to provide you with services?
Do you think psychiatrists are there to guard your mental health?
Do you think the banks are there to make YOU prosperous?
Do you think the media are there to enlighten us?
Do you think teachers are there to educate ?
Do you think the armed forces are there to protect your security?
Do you think regulators are there to ensure all of the above stay in line?
If you have been reading and watching the complicit media for most of your life you likely have been brainwashed into believing all of the above, when in fact many are criminals or forced to act in a criminal way for their masters. They only get away with murder to protect the self appointed elite pulling the strings of their satanically controlled duped goons who act ONLY in the interests of the psychopathic madmen and women running the world while living in VAST OPULENCE.
You might also believe that the latest credit crunch is affecting everybody, but look closely at the facts and you will see there is a tier of privileged individuals who NEVER suffer during controlled recessions. In fact they PROSPER while millions struggle to survive the sudden changes of fortune brought about by the few at the top deciding to rein in the pittance they provide in sustenance to the masses primarily to stop any major dissent from their form of enslavement and tyranny . For centuries these few dynastic families have been getting away with absolute murder turning generation upon generation of our forefathers into slaves for the ultra wealthy. Unless we stop them now our children and grandchildren will suffer the same deviant world they claim is some kind of civilized society. They have required a massive propaganda network to get away with this for so long, but by the day that machine is grinding to a halt in the mass exposure of the monstrous evil they have been getting away with.
Do not be fooled by the fancy clothes and ancient traditions, these mobsters have been using subtle and devious tricks of the trade , disguised as some sort of esoteric knowledge, or so they claim, while using thuggery, blackmail, bullying and abuse to persecute anyone who steps outside their masonic bubble. These maniacs and psychopaths have been raping and murdering in endless wars they create to keep us all in fear and in our lowly place.
THEY ONLY HAVE THAT POWER AS LONG AS WE LET 'EM.
|COMMENTS FROM OUR READERS THAT ARE GREATLY APPRECIATED
Your passionate way with words is a daily source of energy to me and, I would expect, lots of others subscribers---keep it up!!...john
There are hundreds of websites, probably thousands, devoted to men’s issues and combating
feminism. Something for everyone. We are glad the topic is under discussion from every angle.
But if you really want to understand the New World Order conspiracy, one site stands
above the rest because it has the correct New World Order worldview (or close to it):
International Men’s Organisation.
From a review by the
NWO University Forum
Brilliant website matey I read it often and it blows my mind how much information
you have gathered over the years well done dude. Sullers
I have been reading stuff on your website for some time and can relate to everything
that is being exposed. Glad there is a website out there which is really showing up
and exposing it all. Kind regards DR
Hi! Great site! Telling it like it is. Keep it up!
Love the site, you have a done an awesome job
I am an avid reader of International Mens Organisation. JB
We love intmensorg.info!
I really appreciate your collection of resources on the intmensorg.info website.
Thank you for your wonderful resources.
I just checked your website and I am blown away!! Its so cool to be in contact with you!!
I have been reading your site for some time now and gaining a deep insight into the
workings of this so called democratic western world we live in. I would like to show
my appreciation and gratitude. Thank you very much. Just as a good mate of mine
always says: Ignorance is the worst sin.
Therefore the revealing of knowledge and understanding must be the greatest virtue.
Thanks again Rory UK
Amazing info on the site keep up the fab work. NN
Dear Sirs ,
I just want to say how much I love your site. I've been an avid truth seeker
for many years and would be a big time follower of the Jeff Rense program, but I really
think your site is one of the best, well laid out and most interesting alternative media site.
I've only known of its existence over the last week, but I'm already hooked on it.
Keep up the fantastic articles and pressure on the NWO scum.
Name and email supplied
I just suddenly found your site on the internet, and WOW - it really is packed with useful
information about the inhuman beasts who are planning the NWO. Their activities are far
advanced in my country Sweden, but England is leading with regard to public camera watching.
Unfortunately your multimillion population seems to be as sleeping as our 9 million sheeple.
Good luck and keep holding up the torch of Knowledge!
Best regards , Name and email supplied from Sweden
PLEASE SEND US YOUR FEEDBACK ON ANYTHING TO
We try and ensure most of what is published is important and highly relevant to men
globally and especially those men made homeless and penniless by the evil misuse
of the law and courts that have a feminist / homopaedo / masonic /zionist / law society
We reproduce important articles under 'fair use' and in the 'public interest'
with due credit to our sources.
DUE TO MANY ATTACKS ON OUR WEBSITE WE REQUIRE THREE DOMAINS THAT CAN BE ACCESSED
LATEST NEWS UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY EVERY SECOND OF EVERY DAY
EXPOSING WHAT THE MASS MEDIA REFUSE TO EXPOSE (THANKS TO THEIR MEDIA LAWYER CENSORS)
BY REMAINING ON THIS SITE YOU ACCEPT WHATEVER COOKIES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE WEBSITE TO FUNCTION
|TOP BILLIONAIRE GIT'S OF THE YEAR
|GLOBAL POPULATION UNDER ATTACK
|Kaneing: Deporting Brits Back to the Commonwealth #Windrush VIDEO
| Dutch newspaper slammed for ‘anti-Semitic’ cartoon on Gaza protests
|Why is nobody counting the number of homeless deaths? VIDEO
|Universal Credit "isn't working" VIDEO
|Harmsworth's Daily Rat's OTT coverage of latest royal parasite's sprog
Gutter rags and their printing press fascist owners the propaganda tool for the royal mafia
|A rare occasion when the gutter media expose DV murdering bitches VIDEO
22-year old Alex Skeel from Stewartby in Bedfordshire is lucky to be alive after he went through
months of domestic violence at the hands of his former girlfriend. Jordon Worth has become the first
woman in Britain to be convicted of coercive and controlling behaviour and was jailed for more than seven
years for charges that included grievous bodily harm.
Alex told ITV News Anglia that the attacks started off with a glass bottle but went to a hammer, wardrobe poles,
stabbing with knives and then having boiling water thrown over him. He has been speaking out about being a
male victim on domestic abuse.
|Three Fingered Jim Ended up Homeless after Getting Hurt on the Job VIDEO
|Westminster and Holyrood's lying thieving bastards
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Proposed domestic abuse bill drafted to protect victims or used as a tool by the legal mafia to track men
while they steal their homes, bank accounts and children? (All of it drafted like draconian gender biased apartheid style legislation)
Huge Freemason Network Found To Control British Parliament
Holyrood mafia rub shoulders with the rotary club (an executive arm of freemasonry)
Huge military arsenal keeping the royals in power used to salute new sprog
(Meanwhile peasants remain unarmed thanks to draconian gun control that sees only the elite with guns.
Try using machine gun totting marksmen outside your own house to protect it like the royals do and see what happens)
House of Commons
House of Lords
Holyrood mafia rubbing shoulders with the rotary club
Rotary an executive arm of freemasonry
All of the above serve ONLY this mob via freemasonry and the Dukey Kent
The lying thieving bastards that masquerade as some sort of political entity are the biggest threat to heterosexual men on the planet. NOT Russia NOT chemical weapons NOT terror threats or the myriad of pseudo threats they conjure up and inflicted on a long suffering population to hide the fact these evil bastards are destroying families and especially the fathers shunned with a toxic potion of lies to thieve the family silver and to line the pockets of the crooks that thieve with impunity.
The diversionary tactics have been the motto of Britain for centuries. The justification for psychologically torturing and murdering to seize assets from British citizens just as they did during the empire building where nasty wee freemasons were sent across the world to rape and plunder for the British establishment.
Today their gutter rags are falling over themselves pushing the royalist agenda again as one more sprog is born to the nasty fuckers who head this mob of gangsters via freemasonry. Men should not show one iota of empathy for an evil regime that also masquerades as the goody two shoes when they are behind a massive con trick against citizens like the Windrush victims and the sick and disabled forced to live under a brutal regime called the DWP and its many corporate assassins like ATOS and MAXIMUS.
These monsters who claim political power are the biggest murderous lying fuckers on the face of the earth and absolutely NOTHING they claim is the truth but only fairy stories to distract the population from what they are doing closer to home and in every home touched by the divorce industrial complex in a monstrous web of deceit.
Huge Freemason Network Found To Control British Parliament
A brave journalist has exposed how three Freemason lodges operate within Britain’s Parliament – allowing the unelected secret society to dictate government policy.
Those living in Britain today know this is not a happy land. The question of Brexit is still unresolved and Britons know the British State, the politicians, the bankers, the bosses, compose a jamboree for fat cats and stuffed pockets.
But occasionally we get to peek deeper under the curtain. That’s what happened when the Guardian printed an article that blows wide open the big secret: that Freemasonry Lodges control both the House of Commons and the House of Lords at Westminster!
The article describes THREE lodges that infest the heart of British democracy:
The NEW WELCOME Lodge
This is for MP’s, Peers (members of the House of Lords) and Parliamentary Staff (the elected/selected members of the Houses and their civil service staff.)
This is for members of the Political Press Corp, the journalists and reporters who directly cover parliament.
ALFRED ROBBINS Lodge
For “other journalists” therefore, a network of influence over the city of London and the wider nation.
The guardian also says:
One current member of New Welcome told the Guardian that its members keep Gallery Lodge masons at arm’s length, on the grounds that while they are fellow members of the brotherhood, they are still journalists, and “they wouldn’t want journalists listening to their conversations”.
This article exposes something that has been kept quiet for a long time: exactly how the lodge system stitches up Westminster.
Lords and MP’s are all in it together, shaking hands with rolled up trouser legs no matter their affiliation!
Small wonder Britain struggled for a cigarette paper between the parties from John Major, through New Labour, Blair and Brown, onto Cameron/Clegg and now May.
The legacy of the EU on the UK Parliament is a well cushioned bed of cosiness with corporatism and it’s the people who have been getting a rough deal! The Lodge system looks after its own while wealth inequality in Britain has gone stratospheric the last two decades.
The Guardian also says: “so discreet are the members of Gallery Lodge that few journalists working in the lobby appear to be aware of its existence.”
I bloody bet! Letting it be known that the top political journo’s were in the same lodge, bound together by secret allegiance, to stitch up the reporting of the news. No wonder they keep it quiet!
Next time we look at that man on the lawn with a microphone we need to ask: whose speaking here? The news channel? Or the Gallery/Alfred Robbins Lodge?
The Guardian pushed their investigation to question the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE).
From this, they reported “UGLE said Gallery Lodge currently has 45 members and Alfred Robbins Lodge – which is named after a former newspaperman and prominent mason – has 18 members.”
Of course, the statements from Masonry want to downplay this revelation. “Oh, nothing to see hear, nothing to worry your little heads about” is just the kind of condescension the British people have endured from the British establishment for centuries.
But it cannot hide the FACT that this secret network with clear power and influence makes its lair in the bowels of the Palace of Westminster.
If Britain is EVER to drain the sewer then it MUST find a way to flush these organisations OUT of politics and the civil service. If a politician or a civil servant is a member of a lodge, they must be made to declare it.
Let Freemasonry be the harmless rotary club doing charity work it prefers to pretend to be, but let us ensure it can NEVER be the SPIDER at the heart of a web of power, subverting democracy and the will of the people, syphoning the country’s wealth away to crony globalist friends!
Oh yes! Reform in Britain is needed alright! And there is nothing else like knowledge to empower.
|Wall to wall royalist bullshit from the UK's GUTTER press
|One more royal sprog exposes massive disparity in a rare gutter press front page
|Dangerous Waterfall and Road in NEPAL VIDEO
|REFUSING to take part in Governmental FRAUD and the making of the Great British Mortgage Swindle VIDEO
|Tory scum's shocking and brutal treatment of Windrush generation
|Trump says his attorney won't flip VIDEO
|BBC'S none to cosy relationship with MI5 (The blacklisting of alleged subversives)
FULL EXTENSIVE ARTICLE HERE
SO HOW DID JIMMY SAVILE GET AWAY WITH HIS ABUSES FOR SO LONG?
The vetting files: How the BBC kept out ‘subversives’
For decades the BBC denied that job applicants were subject to political vetting by MI5. But in fact vetting began in the early days of the BBC and continued until the 1990s. Paul Reynolds, the first journalist to see all the BBC's vetting files, tells the story of the long relationship between the corporation and the Security Service.
"Policy: keep head down and stonewall all questions." So wrote a senior BBC official in early 1985, not long before the Observer exposed so many details of the work done in Room 105 Broadcasting House that there was no point continuing to hide it.
By that stage, a policy of flatly denying the existence of political vetting - not just stonewalling, but if necessary lying - had been in place for five decades.
As early as 1933 a BBC executive, Col Alan Dawnay, had begun holding meetings to exchange information with the head of MI5, Sir Vernon Kell, at Dawnay's flat in Eaton Terrace, Chelsea. It was an era of political radicalism and both sides deemed the BBC in need of "assistance in regard to communist activities".
These informal arrangements became formal two years later, with an agreement between the two organisations that all new staff should be vetted except "personnel such as charwomen". The fear was that "evilly disposed" engineers might sabotage the network at a critical time, or that conspirators might discredit the BBC so that "the way could be made clear for a left-wing government".
And so routine vetting began. From the start, the BBC undertook not to reveal the role of the Security Service (MI5), or the fact of vetting itself. On one level this made sense, bearing in mind that the very existence of the Secret Service remained a secret until the 1989 Security Service Act.
Over the years, some BBC executives worried about the "deceptive" statements they had to make - even to an inquisitive MP on one occasion. But when MI5 suggested scaling back the number of jobs subject to vetting, the BBC argued against such a move. Though there were some opponents of vetting within the corporation, they had little influence until the Cold War began to thaw in the 1980s.
This is how the system worked.
Vetting was brought into play once a candidate and one or two alternatives labelled "also suitable" had been selected for a job. The alternatives served a useful purpose. If the first choice was barred by vetting, the appointments board moved easily on to the second. The candidates were told only that "formalities" would be carried out before an appointment was made. This sounded harmless enough; it would allow time to follow up references, perhaps. Candidates did not know that "formalities" meant vetting - and was, in fact, the code word for the whole system.
A memo from 1984 gives a run-down of organisations on the banned list. On the left, there were the Communist Party of Great Britain, the Socialist Workers Party, the Workers Revolutionary Party and the Militant Tendency. By this stage there were also concerns about movements on the right - the National Front and the British National Party.
A banned applicant did not need to be a member of these organisations - association was enough.
If MI5 found something against a candidate, it made one of three "assessments" in a kind of league table:
Category "A" stated: "The Security Service advises that the candidate should not be employed in a post offering direct opportunity to influence broadcast material for a subversive purpose."
Category "B" was less restrictive. The Security Service "advised" against employment "unless it is decided that other considerations are overriding".
Category "C" stated that the information against a candidate should not "necessarily debar" them but the BBC "may prefer to make other arrangements" if the post offered "exceptional opportunity" for subversive activity.
The BBC procedure was in principle never to employ someone in Category "A", though a few did get through the net. This contradicted its public position that the BBC controlled all appointments. In theory it did. In practice it gave that choice to MI5 in Category "A" cases.
If staff came under suspicion only after they had been employed by the BBC or applied for transfer to a job that needed vetting, an image resembling a Christmas tree was drawn on their personal file.
This "tree" was an important part of the process. The BBC maintained a "Staff Transfer List" which named staff who needed to be checked if they were to be promoted. A tree added to the file alerted the administration that this was a security case. Also written on to their file was a so-called "Standing Reminder". This stated: "Not to be promoted or transferred (or placed on continuous contract) without reference to [Director of Personnel]."
So keen was the BBC to maintain secrecy that it secretly removed the Standing Reminder from someone's file if they went to an Industrial Tribunal, which had the power to call for personal files. It was also agreed to (misleadingly) explain away a stamp on a file saying "Normal Appointments Formalities Completed" by pretending that it referred to "routine procedures, Next of Kin, Pension etc".
The Christmas tree was eventually dropped in 1984 because it was said to attract too much attention. It attracted a great deal of attention when the Observer described it in 1985. The day after publication, someone hung some Christmas decorations on the door handle of Room 105 in Broadcasting House, from where the system was run.
|Thousands rally in Tel Aviv to protect Israel from turning into ‘Netanyahu state’ VIDEO
|Windrush exposes the ruthless and brutal tory regime that left a victim homeless after brain surgery
|RT reporter hit by tear gas while covering protests in Gaza VIDEO
|Desmond's rag having a royalist propaganda laugh
When psychopaths are in control of printing presses you get this utter bullshit
|An Empire Built on Fear at Home and Abroad
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Political leaders and the mass media deluge the public with a constant stream of frightening incidents caused by the enemy-of-the-week: nerve gas killing dozens of little babies in Syria, Russian-directed poison assassination attempts in England and terror incidents throughout Europe, requiring an increase in domestic police state surveillance and spying. Extensively monitored bank records, intrusive workplace controls, and all personal and, especially, political communications, are in the hands of state security officials or corporate security contractors.
Hundreds of prosecuting attorneys look forward to career-enhancing investigations in perpetuity, tracking the complex networks of extended personal and family links, including long forgotten acquaintances and the contents of casual conversations. Everyone may be subject to interrogations without warrant or explanation. And the ‘media’ cheers on the process.
Political trials and convictions in court and the media are rampant. Social, work-place and academic self censorship and blacklisting of dissident voices have become pervasive and accepted.
Elections and appointments are rigged by corporate and special interests to favor the most bellicose ideologues who manufacture the pretexts for war.
Political intimidation, trade wars and sanctions run amok .
‘Exceptional’ people in authority are defined by their power to bludgeon the majority into passive submission. Corporate mass media propaganda repeats brief and lurid messages calling for the death and destruction of the latest ‘fill-in-the-blank’ enemy.
War fever is everywhere infesting the weak minds of local opinion leaders, who echo the rants and raves of psychotic leaders without pausing to question.
Last week, the Mexican immigrant workers were described as dangerous invaders, drug dealers, rapists and threats to the every day life of ordinary citizens. Walls are being constructed and thousands of National Guard are called to the border to confront the invading agricultural workers and their families.
Before that, Muslims were broadly described as brainwashed terrorists, programmed to plant bombs at their first opportunity anywhere and everywhere – on mass transport, in congested amusement parks, in any public space where the innocent may be harmed. A draconian ban of the entry of Muslims has been instituted – including elderly parents joining their citizen sons or daughters.
After the latest maniac massacre of students, understaffed public schools, (but not private, elite schools), are urged to arm the teachers with baseball bats, rocks and guns. Instead of multiplication drills, terrified teachers hold daily and weekly drills in their over-crowded classrooms – stuffing their pupils into closets and bathrooms. Elementary school lunchtimes have become prison-like exercises in ‘total silence’ drills as if to fool the would-be shooter. Images of little Oliver Twist meekly whispering to an armed guard for a bathroom pass come to mind. Haunting some outraged parents is the fear that a mad intruder might set fire to the school suffocating scores of children locked in closets and bathroom stalls because ‘fire-drills’ have been superseded by ‘shooter-drills’.
Fear stalks the land! Where will it end?
An Empire Built on Fear
Domination is the driving force of US Empire builders. But today’s empire is built on fragile economic foundations. An Empire, which has aimed to dominate the world for the long duration, now stumbles over a series of military defeats abroad and increasingly relies on instilling fear, intimidation and propaganda on its domestic citizenry to regain its dominance.
Inculcating fear, especially at home, is the method of choice.
Since the ruling class of ‘the 1%’ seeks to maintain its world domination, based on increasing exploitation and widening inequalities, voluntary submission of the majority cannot be taken for granted.
The vast majority of citizens no longer trust the ruling elite. The school lessons in democracy and civic responsibility have lost their credibility. How can public school children, who now cower in closets, believe in citizen and constitutional rights?
Unending economic insecurity and the increasingly phony patriotic sideshows are beginning to stir up popular discontent. Large scale, long-term trillion-dollar bank bailouts and exorbitant military budgets are financed by the slash and burn of workers’ wages, job security, public services and the social safety net. Soaring medical costs are the primary cause of personal bankruptcy among the working and lower middle classes. A physician-pharmaceutical industry fueled opioid addiction crisis is narcotizing millions and killing well over one hundred Americans each day. The unemployed are prescribed multiple mood altering drugs to numb their anxieties about the future. Fear, incompetent medical care, self-destruction, despair and pain all lead to premature death causing the life expectancy among workers to drop for the first time in US history.
Professionals and opinion leaders, from teachers and physicians to journalists, have abandoned their ethics and enabled the mass deception and oppression of their students, patients and readers.
An empire, which fails to reward its supporters, like President Trump’s marginalized voters, and repeatedly reneges on its promises, can only rely on fear.
The fear we experience is brought about by the ruling class; repeated and embellished by the mass media; and made legitimate by local opinion leaders through face-to-face daily encounters. Teachers and terrified parents instill this fear into the very young without stopping to analyze the origins and motives behind the fear mongering.
The mass message tells us that we face daily threats from terrorists; that we must increase our vigilance; that we must constantly strengthen police state powers; that we must accept the use of advanced lethal police weaponry on our streets; that we must turn to informing on our neighbors and co-workers as potential terrorists, militants, activists, critics and immigrants embedded in offices, factories, schools, churches and neighborhoods. Meanwhile our oligarch-leaders bless themselves with massive tax-cuts and enjoy the greatest concentration of wealth in history.
Fear diverts attention from the imperial state as it engages in dozens of wars and occupies several hundred overseas military bases. The simplest comment that this has resulted in countless thousands of deaths and countless millions of destroyed lives, not to speak of the countless billions of dollars funneled into the bulging pockets of the ruling class, is censored from all public debate.
Fear permeates society: Communications are bugged and manipulated. People are afraid to discuss, let alone move to solve, their common socio-economic problems for fear of reprisals. The message to the many is ‘keep it to yourself or to your closest kin”.
Fearful people are compelled to publicly demonstrate their loyalty to the State – wear flag-pins and repeat illogical propaganda about the ‘enemy of the week’.
Peaceful objections to worshipping the symbols of the State are demonized and non-conformists, even among talented athletes, are punished by the State and see their careers demolished before the eyes of the entire society – collective punishment for any who resist injustice.
Fear and hopelessness feeds the opioid epidemic –with millions of workers addicted, a direct result of work place injury and job insecurity, as well as of incompetent medical care in the absence of a truly accountable national health care system. Physicians may have been ‘pressured’ to prescribe highly addicting drugs to workers, but they grew rich in the process.
Fear prevents speaking out and collective struggles.
Just turn on the television ‘news’: The demagogues for the ruling class direct the fearful masses to look downward instead of upward, to fear the poor or the immigrant, rather than the banker or the militarists.
Fear is converted to anger directed toward foreigners, Muslims, Afro-Americans, ‘deplorable’ (meaning poor, marginalized, working class) whites, war protestors and strikers.
Islamophobes, Russophobes and Sinophobes monopolize the channels of opinion. Any critic of Israel is fired and permanently blacklisted. Critics identifying the ‘neo-cons’, behind the current march to war, are denounced as crypto-anti-Semitites. The loudest war criminals are re-appointed to the highest political offices – despite their blood drenched past.
Fear and self-loathing go hand in hand to secure submission to the ruling class, which channels self-hatred toward political adversaries, external economic competitors and domestic victims (the poor, the marginalized and unemployed) – who cannot die or be locked up fast enough.
Pervasive fear is constantly invented and re-invented, to keep the populace on edge, unbalanced and in search of seemingly innocuous distractions to reduce anxieties.
Russia is described as an advancing menacing, murderous, blind juggernaut in order to induce popular compliance with unending arms build-ups and to provide cannon fodder for an impending nuclear war.
US organized and funded ‘regime changes’, led by terrorist proxies in the Ukraine, or direct invasion in Iraq, Libya and Syria, and the NATO encirclement of Russian borders and economic sanctions rely on fear mongering. The message is: ‘We must bomb them first or they (Russia, China, Syria, Iran…fill-in-the-blank) will launch a sneak attack on ‘us’.
The repeatedly elected Russian President Putin is demonized as a ‘KGB’ authoritarian who must be confronted by our ‘strong leader’ – the arbitrary, accidental, fearless Twitter-addict, and mad bomber President Donald Trump, aided by the Holy Alliance – Theresa May, Manny Macron, the Crown Prince MBS of Saudi Arabia and Benny Netanyahu. What will history make of a Declaration of War by Twitter! If any historians survive…
Fear is the last desperate weapon for retaining an unchallenged world empire. Fearful adversaries are compelled to negotiate away their defenses and disarm, like Iraq and Libya, and then allow the ‘empire’ to commence slaughter at will. Military threats directed against Iran are naked attempts to force them to dismantle their defensive missiles and cut ties with regional allies. The plan is to disarm and isolate Tehran, in order to launch an attack with impunity and— force 80 million Persians to submit to the combined wills of the US, Israeli and Saudi oligarchs.
China is threatened with trade wars and an air and maritime encirclement by the US military. This aims to strike fear in the Chinese leadership and force them to surrender economic sovereignty, financial markets and industrial competitiveness in order to reverse China’s growth and advances.
Step by step concessions by targeted nations will lead to great takeovers: The ultimate goal, since the time of President Harry Truman, is the re-conquest of the Asian giant, reducing the Chinese to beg with a rusted iron rice bowl.
Russia will be accused of endless poison gas attacks and war crimes everywhere and every week from Ukraine to the quiet lanes of England to the US-Saudi funded war against its ally Syria. These serve as a pretext for greater economic sanctions, cutting all possibility for debate and diplomatic resolution, leading to economic blockades and global war.
The American ruling class’ dream is to rule over a radiated world from the luxury of their billion-dollar bunkers! Even as they strike fear and hysteria in the citizenry, they expose their methods: the only real fear is the power of manufactured fear itself.
The ruling class has planted fear-mongers throughout both political parties. They only seem to compete over which is more successful in sowing confusion and fear among the voters: Millions of immigrants are rounded up from work and home; missile strikes and wars expand onto three continents; media and mass communications are largely controlled by the military industrial corporate complex; secret police investigations are routine; prosecutors seek to investigate even our grandfathers, long cold in their graves.
Fearful Americans are just spectators, ‘quiet Americans’ waiting for the next massacre, the next bomb to fall. They are told to cower in their bedrooms, while their children are shoved into closets. They are now fearful that the Russians (or this week’s ‘fill-in-the-blank’ intruder) will poison our pizza or bomb us to the Stone Age.
Wall Street fears they will lose China, the biggest financial market in the world, as ‘the Donald’s’ trade war turns ‘hot’.
The Pentagon fears that its ships will collide in the Potomac River and some ‘temp’ contractor will push the wrong button.
The Senators fear losing their perks as they drag their young interns into basement bunkers…for their own safety.
The President, his Cabinet, UN representatives and senior advisors are afraid that the population might wake up to find that missiles and nukes can move in both directions.
By the time the masses finally discover that the greatest menace stalking the country is the fear-mongering propaganda: They will have read an epitaph for their untimely nuclear death.
James Petras is a Bartle Professor (Emeritus) of Sociology at Binghamton University, New York. https://petras.lahaine.org/
|FAA issues rare emergency directive after fatal Southwest engine failure VIDEO
|Syria: Boy in White Helmets FAKE Chemical Attack Video Reveals Truth VIDEO
|Southwest Airlines Flight 1380 Engine Video - NTSB VIDEO
|Windrush fiasco exposes tory racism blocking black victims rights
|Gutter press glowing obituaries but only for jewish homosexuals
|Broken fan blade behind engine explosion that sucked woman out of Boeing 737
Good to see the tory mafia have their priorities right while the world is seemingly
in collapse they concentrate on the mundane.
|Israeli lobby and gutter press in malicious attack on Corbyn
|Who Runs The World? Psychopaths and Liars VIDEO
|SNP hypocrisy over secret link to Cambridge Analytica
|Thomas Sheridan - Psychopaths - How to Identify Them Among Us (2017) VIDEO
|Labour MP Ruth Smeeth's anti-Semitic claims against Labour party (Despite working for Israeli lobby) VIDEO
|Eva Bartlett: Everything you've been told about Syria is a lie VIDEO
|ROGER WATERS - WHITE HELMETS ARE FAKE PROPAGANDA FOR TERRORISTS VIDEO
|May claims she's NOT Trump's poodle
|Brutal tory regime at it again
|Senator Exposes Syrian WMD False Flag; Says Hillary Ordered Murder Of Chris Stevens VIDEO
|Report from Damascus: The Aftermath of American Aggression on Syria VIDEO
|More gutter press bullshit on Syrian attack reprisals
|Why didn't Trump go to Congress before striking Syria? – RT asks State Senator Richard Black VIDEO
|UK's gutter press back brutal tory regime's Syrian attacks
|Sorrell steps down as head of ad giant after probe into 'personal misconduct'
ZIONIST SORRELL EXPOSED IN STAGGERING UK WEALTH GAP (From an earlier publication now pulled by coincidence)
Sorrell steps down as head of ad giant after probe into 'personal misconduct'
Sorrell, the long time CEO of advertising giant WPP, made £70 million ($102 million) in 2015. That's 1,444 times the average pay of the company's 125,000 employees
City knives are out for Martin Sorrell and his WPP empire
Sorrell's £42m payout IN 2017 takes earnings to £210m in five years
Sorrell on jewish billionaire list
Governments may bail out newspapers, says Sorrell
Top company boss Sir Martin Sorrell today exposed the staggering wealth gap in Britain by declaring that his £1 million base salary is "very low".
The head of advertising giant WPP stunned MPs as he defended bumper income rises for boardroom chiefs as millions of other workers are seeing their pay frozen or rise very slightly.
He was grilled on BBC radio on his £4.2 million pay package for 2010, up from £2.3 million a year earlier, after a report revealed that FTSE directors had seen their remuneration rise by 49 per cent on average.
Sir Martin, whose basic salary is
£1 million, said: "It's a very low base pay. The base pay is then increased by a short-term incentive which is an annual cash plan and a long-term incentive - a stock in the company in which I continue to invest."
He stressed he continued to invest millions in WPP and that his risk was "very much key to the success of the company."
He also emphasised that WPP's profits had risen significantly from 2009 to 2010.
His comments amazed some MPs. "What planet do these people live on?" asked shadow education minister Karen Buck, who described the huge rises as "grotesque".
Speaking in Perth, Australia, David Cameron said he was "concerned" about the report on huge pay rises for boardroom bosses in Britain in the past year and admitted there had been a "problem" with closed shop remuneration committees.
"Boards have got to think when they are making pay awards, is this the right and responsible thing to do," he said. "Of course you have got to attract the best talent to run the business you are accountable for as a non-executive director, but is what you are doing responsible?
"Everyone, whether they are in public life or private enterprise, they have got to be able to justify the decisions they make about pay."
Sir Martin, the chief executive of
$16 billion marketing conglomerate WPP, said his firm was global and warned of the dangers of driving companies out of Britain and getting less well-run firms by slashing top pay.
"Look at what chief executives of media companies are paid in other parts of the world," he said.
But Conservative MP Jo Johnson said: "Corporate governance on the whole is failing in Britain's publicly listed companies. Executive pay is the litmus test of effective corporate governance and executive pay is clearly out of control."
The report by Incomes Data Services found that directors in the country's top firms had seen their average earnings rise to just under £2.7 million.
Steve Tatton of IDS said: "Britain's economy may be struggling to return to pre-recession levels of output, but the same cannot be said of FTSE 100 directors' remuneration."
Paul Kenny, general secretary of the GMB union, said: "This is another example of how the elite greedy pigs who run our top companies behave."
|'Trump, May and Macron see themselves as masters of mankind' VIDEO
|THIS IS NOT WHY DONALD TRUMP GOT ELECTED! VIDEO
|Trump Attacks Syria HOURS Before International Inspectors To Be At ALLEGED Chemical Attack Site VIDEO
| Lunatics running the asylum VIDEO
|Front pages on Syrian strike
|Proof Secret Space Programs are Vastly More Advanced than the Public Realizes VIDEO
|Brutal tory regime not happy with murdering thousands in UK now want to do same in Syria
|USA believes and acts as if it's above any law' - Bolivian envoy to UN VIDEO
|Boxer Tyson Fury pissed off at scumbag ITV reporters smears of misogyny, homophobia and anti-Semitism VIDEO
|Secrets Of Body Language VIDEO
|Bolton Whispers War In Trump’s Ears VIDEO
|USA Senator Actually Admits That The War In Syria Is For Israel VIDEO
|TUCKER RESPONDS TO WAR PROPAGANDISTS CALLING HIM A TRAITOR! VIDEO
|First North Korea now Syria
Goalposts change everytime Trump acts like wild west cowboy alongside his deputy May
|Homelessness: sleeping rough in the British countryside VIDEO
|This is Actually Happening World Wide! VIDEO
|One rule for feminists another for men
|Two trouble leaders want war
|Key moments from Zuckerberg hearing VIDEO
|Critics of Facebook demonstrate on Capitol Hill in Washington DC VIDEO
|Tucker: Would war against Assad make USA safer? VIDEO
|Homeless Man Recently Discharged From New Orleans Hospital VIDEO
|Trump "FBI BROKE INTO The Offices Of One Of My Attorneys! IT'S A TOTAL WITCH HUNT!" VIDEO
|BREAKING! SYRIA AIRBASE ATTACK APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN COMMITED BY ISRAEL! VIDEO
| BREAKING: SYRIANGIRL Explains Who Is Behind The Latest "Chemical Attack" In Douma, Syria VIDEO
|Thug raises his hand a £20 fine. Father raises his voice loses his life
|Runaway engineless train in India terrifies passengers VIDEO
|Gun Control: UK Murders Now Skyrocketing as Police Fail to Protect Defenseless Populace
FULL ARTICLE HERE
What is the best form of defence against a terror attack?
Americans Agree! The Only Way To Stop A Bad Guy With A Gun Is A Good Guy With A Gun! (VIDEO)
British royals won't face the same threats as UK peasants as they have a massive arsenal of marksmen protecting them
while Brits have NOTHING. A gullible public, after Dunblane, believed that removing guns would stop murders
and how naive to think, with no means to protect themselves, the knights in shining armour, British cops
would come to the rescue. There are NO shortage of gun totting cops protecting the royals and their political lackeys
In the early 20th century, British citizens were trusted by their government to own firearms. In fact, then-Prime Minister Robert Gascoyne-Cecil, the Marquess of Salisbury once said he would “laud the day when there was a rifle in every cottage in England.” However, beginning with a law requiring a permit for handguns, Britain would embark down the slippery slope of a total citizen disarmament, and by 1996, all guns, including handguns, were banned in the UK.
In fact, so scared of its citizens having guns is the United Kingdom that in 2006, the government even banned toy guns under the guise of “reducing violence” with the Violent Crime Reduction Act. Fast forward to 2018 and — as gun rights activists have consistently warned — only criminals and the government have guns.
The result of the incremental stripping of rights has left the citizens of the United Kingdom sitting ducks merely waiting for violent criminals and a corrupt government to take hold. According to multiple new reports, this now seems to be the case.
Scotland Yard has since called an emergency meeting as London is now gripped by unprecedented violent crime. This violent crime spike comes as an ex-senior officer says “police have lost control of the streets.”
Following a massive spike in murders — one that has now passed that of New York City — police chiefs are scrambling to try and tackle knife and gun violence in the city.
“London is currently experiencing an exceptionally high level of gun and knife crime,” the invite to the emergency meeting read, according to the Guardian. “It is important that our response is fully informed by community concerns and any community tensions are rapidly identified, heard and responded to.”
According to the Guardian, among those attending the meeting were the Labour MP for Tottenham, David Lammy, and Nicola Calica-Myall, an activist against knife crime whose own son was stabbed 37 times when he was just 17 and survived.
“It’s important to know that our fears as a community are being recognized and things are in place,” Calica-Myall said, according to the Guardian. “It’s everybody’s problem and more Londoners need to recognize this situation may not go away any time soon.
Indeed, the problem has gotten so out of hand that six teenagers were stabbed this week, in the space of only 90 minutes.
Although many of the solutions proposed with undoubtedly involve more police, the former head of head of diversity and policing, Victor Olisa, warned that police are losing control of public spaces and hit out at senior officials for their “deafening silence.”
“Communities are saying we don’t see the police around anymore,” he said. “It appears to people I have spoken to as though the police have lost control of public spaces and the streets,” the Guardian reports. “The silence from senior officers in the Met is deafening. They should say we need more information from the public, this is what we are doing, this is what the results are.”
The need for police would be drastically diminished if the citizens of London could simply defend themselves. However, that is not an option unless they use sticks or knives (under three inches): a futile choice considering the fact that criminals have illegal guns and knives at their disposal.
Even many police chiefs in the United States understand that police cannot be everywhere to stop every crime. As TFTP has reported, police chiefs across the country have urged that citizens arm themselves because a well-armed citizen is the best defense against crime — not police.
|'Why Is Epstein Spending $29mm to Bury tunnels ' Q New Warnings VIDEO
|Israeli's shoot Palestinian footballer Mohammed Khalil in his knee putting an end to his career VIDEO
|‘UK govt behaving like a mafia state’ claims ex-OSCE VP on Skripal case VIDEO
|Former Catalan police chief charged with sedition
|UK cops are fucking masonic lunatics who don't stop crime but instead arrest victims of crime
|Abby Martin interviews journalist and author Max Blumenthal on the current situation in Palestine VIDEO
|What's the black lines painted on wings for? VIDEO
|Can you ever believe a tory government?
|UK (IN)justice as man protecting home from burglars is arrested
|WAR ON STATUES! "I DON'T THINK ANY HUMAN BEING DESERVES A STATUE!" VIDEO
|British cops are being 'trained to deliberately hide evidence they don't want defence to see'
FULL ARTICLE HERE
The case against Liam Allan , who was accused of rape, was dropped days before he was due to stand trial after evidence including his accuser's diary was uncovered
This exposure fails to mention the lawyers are every bit as bad during divorce and civil actions where malicious allegations
are raised with no proof only hearsay evidence that allows them to steal men's homes, assets and children with impunity.
Police officers are trained to hide evidence that would undermine their investigations in court, a damning dossier reveals.
Documents show how police and prosecutors employ certain tactics to stop defence teams from seeing materials that could help their client during their trial.
Other accusations include officers being reluctant to record witness statements that hurt their case or presenting vital evidence to lawyers at the last second.
The revelations come after the recent collapse of several rape cases, leading to heightened concerns that evidence is not being disclosed properly.
One ploy used by police is to put evidence 'on the MG6D', which refers to a list of sensitive unused material which a defendant's legal team does not have access to.
Examples of legitimate materials which may be put on the MG6D include those relating to the interest of national security or information about an undercover officer.
The dossier is compiled from reports of 14 focus groups of police officers, judges and prosecutors.
One comment in the file read: 'In even quite serious cases, officers have admitted to deliberately withholding sensitive material from us and they frequently approach us only a week before trial.
'Officers are reluctant to investigate a defence or take statements that might assist the defence or undermine our case.'
Referring to the practice of exploiting the MG6D, an inspector said that officers are'trained to put items on there that they do not want disclosed to the defence'.
The revealing dossier was obtained under a freedom of information act request by charity the Centre for Criminal Appeals.
More than 900 suspects had charges dropped last year because police and prosecutors failed to hand evidence to defence lawyers.
In the lead up to criminal trials, police and prosecutors have a duty to disclose evidence that might either assist the defence case or undermine the prosecution.
But the recent collapse of several rape cases has heightened concerns that evidence is not being disclosed early enough, and that the rules are not being followed.
The trial of student Liam Allan, 22, who was charged with six counts of rape, was halted by a judge after it emerged his accuser had sent hundreds of messages to friends that would have cleared him.
The case against an Oxford student accused of rape was dropped days before he was due to stand trial after evidence including his accuser's diary was uncovered.
Yesterday it was announced by Scotland Yard that officers would be abandoning the policy of automatically believing victims of rape.
Commissioner Cressida Dick said officers must investigate rather than blindly believe allegations, and should keep an open mind when a victim has come forward.
Failure to disclose evidence has led to a series of collapsed cases
The issue of disclosure of evidence has been at the centre of a series of sex offence trials which have collapsed in recent months.
More than 900 criminal cases were dropped last year due to a failure by police or prosecutors to disclose evidence.
The series of failures led former Lord Chief Justice, Igor Judge, to warn that juries may start to think they have not been shown all the evidence, and victims to not come forward.
In December, Isaac Itiary was released from prison after it emerged his alleged victim posed as a 19-year-old woman and lied about her age.
Police officers had texts which showed the girl was lying about her age but only released them after he had spent four months in custody awaiting his trial.
In February, the case against Samson Makele, 28, was halted after his defence team unearthed vital photographs from his mobile phone which had not been made available.
Mr Makele was accused of raping a woman after they met at Notting Hill Carnival in 2016 but he always claimed the sex was consensual.
His case, which was due to begin in March, was thrown out after more than a dozen photographs were found which showed the pair naked and cuddling in bed.
Oxford student Oliver Mears, 19, spent two years on bail accused of raping and indecently assaulting a woman in July 2015.
But the CPS decided to offer no evidence against him in February on the basis of fresh evidence, including a diary that supported his case, which was passed to the CPS just a week earlier.
|Why losing your money could cost you your life
|Gutter media speak with one forked tongue VIDEO
|Alison Saunders was desperate to secure more rape convictions to appease the feminist lobby
|'Anti-Semitism' hysteria - a scam to silence free speech and exposure of Israel Apartheid VIDEO
|The feminist lawyer witch responsible for so many innocent men being jailed for rape resigns
|Terrorist threat wearing thin so the COLD war is resurrected once again VIDEO
How to keep the peasants down, in fear and easily malleable
|The story so far: How to keep an evil murderous government in power
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Proof the Israeli mafia are manipulating the world's political systems
FROM MARCH 2017 BUT NOTHING EVER HAPPENS
First create a false flag to blame Russia on something and get the USA and Nato mafia to back that lie.
Associate the OTHER party, that isn't part of the mass murder of the peasants thanks to austerity and sanctioning
of the poorest sections of society, with sympathy for a possible alternative reason for the false flag. Attack the other party for daring to suggest the evil government narrative might not be entirely correct.
If that isn't having a big enough impact use the Israeli mafia to seed dissent and instead of showing sympathy for the Palestine mass murder by zionist warmongers force the other party to bow to the demands of the Israeli lobby admitting that not showing sufficient sympathy for Israel is anti-semitic and Hitler-like for daring to do so.
The OTHER party has already been dismantled by a former warmonger and his place men have been embedded and used to turn a supposed working class party into a second party of the toffs that is no longer funded by the workers but by a small clique of rich zionist backers who ensure they have to support Israel to the hilt.
These are the seeds being sown for the scum and filth to call for another sudden election while their gutter press have done sufficient damage to the other party to ensure the sheeple wont dare to vote for them as they would then be connected with all of the above.
This has been going on for decades in Britain and wont change until a truly representative party of the ordinary voters is found and will stand up to the malicious attacks that see time and again a vicious fascist regime hell bent on doing ANYTHING to stay in power. Only the truly dimwitted could continue to believe the yarns being spun to keep the party in power that only ever bows to their ultra rich backers and the zionist agenda.
|Freemasons disguised as Scottish cops acting like the Stasi
FULL ARTICLE HERE
SNP cop merger plan a total disaster (Instead of eight freemasons running the show they only require ONE
who could be easily manipulated to carry out the SNP master plan of massive house theft with Sturgeon
as the lawyer / political / feminist / homo leaning lackey for the terror cell that is the Law Society of Scotland.
See her latest domestic violence ruse used as the excuse to thieve on the grandest of scales)
Heterosexual men the new black in Apartheid Scotland
Police Scotland in secret phone hack operation
SCOTTISH police have been secretly hacking phones and harvesting massive amounts of data from members of the public, the Sunday Herald can reveal.
The hacking operation uses new technology to override passwords and encryption, and can download every piece of data held on a mobile phone without the owner’s knowledge. Calls have now gone out for any future harvesting of data to be obtained only under warrant.
In a secretive pilot project, 18 officers were trained to use a device known as a ‘kiosk’ - which is similar in size to an iPad and can access text messages, encrypted conversations on apps, passwords, geo-locations, contacts, photos, web browsing history and call records in seconds. Deleted data can also be obtained using the technology. Crucially, data cannot be taken within a specific time frame – if police want to access messages or photographs from a particular date, they must access all photographs and messages.
The trials, which took place in Edinburgh and Stirling, saw 375 phones and 262 SIM cards accessed during investigations of what Police Scotland called “low-level crime”. It is not known whether the phones belonged to suspects, victims or witnesses, or whether owners were told that officers would override passwords to access phones.
Privacy campaigners said there should be independent oversight of Police Scotland’s use of 'kiosks' and accused the force of undermining the fundamental principle of policing by consent. The Scottish Liberal Democrats echoed the call for oversight, and the Scottish Greens said police should obtain a warrant before accessing phones.
Police confirmed kiosk trials took place at Edinburgh’s Gayfield Square Police Station between May 10 and September 2, 2016 and at Stirling Police Station between June 19, 2017 and January 5, 2018. At Gayfield police accessed 195 mobile phones and 262 Sim cards. At Stirling 180 phones were accessed. The initial admission about the existence of trials of the technology came in a response to a Freedom of Information request. In the official response, Police Scotland said: “We have previously trialled the use of kiosks in the East of Scotland for low-level crime, defined as that which appears from the outset to be a case likely to be prosecuted at summary level.” The majority of cases in Scotland are dealt with using summary procedures and offences range from breach of the peace and minor road traffic offences to theft, assault and drug possession.
A force spokesman later said the data extraction trial at Gayfield was “predominantly” for “drugs related” investigations. The spokesman was unable to say how many cases resulted in a conviction. In the official response, Police Scotland said 18 officers were trained to use kiosks and data extracted was “retained at a local level”.
The response to the Freedom of Information request added: “No formal review has been conducted to date and further future trials are being considered.” When the Sunday Herald questioned Police Scotland about the pilot the spokesman appeared to contradict the response to the FoI request by insisting that data has not been retained and “there will be no future trials”.
He confirmed that they used a Cellebrite Kiosk in the trials. The Israeli manufacturer boasts that the units can “access a wide range of evidence sources, including encrypted or locked mobile devices, public and private social media and other cloud data”. Solicitor Millie Wood of campaign group Privacy International said some extraction devices access data based on its type, rather than by its time frame. She said: “You can’t take one message or photo, you have to take all messages or photos. You can’t limit data extraction by time period. Given what we know about how kiosks are used, that’s a huge amount of data to obtain. It’s excessive and it has stirred our concerns.”
Wood believes many people may have been unaware of the trial when police took their phones. She said: “The use of the kiosk in the East of Scotland trial means they must have been using it in live investigations. It’s probable that there are a lot of people out there that were part of a trial they didn’t know about. We don’t know how many people, we don’t know how much data was extracted.” She said police should be compelled to obtain a warrant before using kiosks in Scotland.
“Policing is by consent, which means there must be transparency and integrity,” Wood added. “If this data extraction is happening in secret and under the radar, there can be no consent.
“There must now be independent oversight of Police Scotland’s data extraction activities so that someone can see what’s been going on.”
Former police officer John Finnie, who is now an MSP and the justice spokesman for the Scottish Greens, also said a warrant should be required before Police Scotland can access phones. He said: “It’s important that we see what checks and balances are in place to comply with data protection and human rights as, sadly, Police Scotland has not always had a strong track record in this area. A warrant would be one way of establishing whether data access was proportionate.”
Scottish Liberal Democrat justice spokesperson Liam McArthur MSP, added: “With such an extraordinary amount of data at stake, people are right to ask what oversight there is, and should be, of this process. We need to know what guidance, guarantees and protections against misuse exist.”
It is understood Police Scotland believes it complied with data protection guidelines during the trial and only examined phones that were lawfully obtained.
When asked whether owners gave consent a Police Scotland spokesman said: “All phones had to be lawfully seized for a policing purpose. This can include a device being obtained by use of a warrant or handed to police voluntarily during an investigation.”
Detective Chief Inspector Brian Stuart added: “Given the explosion of mobile devices in recent years, law enforcement has to be innovative with technology and keep ahead of the curve to ensure the safety of its citizens.”
|Gutter rag gangsters still using Israeli mafia to attack Labour / Corbyn and Putin for good measure
|Core Meaning Of Second Amendment Was To Prevent Govt From Taking Away Arms Of Citizens VIDEO
|A Shocking Revelation for America! VIDEO
|Cambridge Analytica: Just how important is it? VIDEO
|UK govt and media on Skripal case pretty much like 2003 Iraq WMD hoax - Neil Clark VIDEO
|Cambridge Analytica: The Mexico allegations VIDEO
|John Pilger: Blocking internet access for Julian Assange is a war on freedom of speech VIDEO
| The Illuminati Dont Want You Watching This Video! VIDEO
|'Assange is a war hero, he exposed American war crimes' – Vivienne Westwood VIDEO
|Distressing video of Israeli soldiers detaining a three-year old child in Hebron VIDEO
|Zuckerberg in 2008: "We've learned…just exactly how important privacy is." VIDEO
|‘Deadly Russian octopus’ coming to streets of NY – get the metaphor? VIDEO
|Man survives close encounter with cheetah on safari VIDEO
|"We shouldn't stand for cheating" says Christopher Wylie VIDEO
|Cambridge Analytica data on thousands of Facebook users still not deleted VIDEO
|UK justice = innocents locked up and evil bastards let out
|Cambridge Analytica whistleblower Christopher Wylie gives evidence to MPs VIDEO
|'Skripal case is a carefully-constructed drama' - John Pilger VIDEO
|Harmsworth's Daily Rat uses Israeli mafia to attack Labour and Corbyn
|How is BDS affecting Israel? | Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement VIDEO
|Are there ANY voting issues NOT being undermined by stolen data?
|Cowardly firefighting bosses failed despicably at Manchester attack
|Zionist leaning gutter press join Israeli lobby attack on Labour
Inside Britain's Israel Lobby(VIDEO)
Four gutter press rags support the brazen Israeli lobby attack on Labour.
Harmsworth (Mail), Barclay Brothers (Telegraph), Murdoch (Times) and Amelia Fawcett(Guardian).
Israeli lobby try NEW tactic by openly protesting in front of Parliament instead of the sneaky
devious methods exposed in the video below
|Harmsworth's zionist leaning Daily Rat joins with Israeli mafia to attack Labour and Corbyn
They only want a far right wing mafia called the tory party in power
Britain's political mafia bow and cater for this nonsense
|"Out Of Control Chinese Space Station" Hurtling Towards Earth! VIDEO
|Proof the Israeli mafia are manipulating the world's political systems
|MOST Eerie and Terrifying Space DISASTERS VIDEO
|60 Minutes - Stormy Daniels on Trump VIDEO
How lawyers use the law like a mafia
|Florida Shooting Survivor Kyle Kashuv Was Not Allowed To Speak At Rally VIDEO
|Cambridge Analytica: New details about its wider network of firms VIDEO
|Hypocritical SNP want Facebook regulated while using them to TARGET voters
|"Vote Leave" in Brexit cash plot
|Zionist controlled gutter press attack Corbyn on 'ANTI-SEMITIC' Art
|Soft justice for Scotland's property thieves
Along with all the crooked lawyers, who instead of being jailed,
got off scot free after
doing a deal to give evidence at their trial.
|Creepy and sinister Freemason Royal Ritual at the Royal Albert Hall VIDEO
Where the real terrorists reside. These are the FRIENDS the royals will be sending out invites for the royal wedding to
put on a big fake show as if they are loved by the peasantry.They have an entourage of freemasons
to prop up their vile reign of tyranny. This is the mob that have ensured the royal parasite remains
the richest most ruthless despot on the planet. How many judges, lawyers, cops , politicians, bankers, councillors and
a myriad of government lackeys globally are within their ranks protecting themselves and their vile agenda?
THEY ARE THE BIGGEST THREAT TO HETEROSEXUAL MEN ACROSS THE GLOBE BY FAR
|Homopaedo sex beast caged for secretly preying on young boys for years
He was a respected member of the community and the masonic tie says it all
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Predator Robert Brown was given a medal for repatriating fallen troops but secretly preyed on young boys for years.
An undertaker honoured for bringing home war dead was yesterday jailed for child sex abuse.
He was a respected member of the community – a church organist and rewarded for his role in giving war casualties a dignified homecoming.
But Robert Brown concealed a sinister side from those who looked up to him – as the depraved abuser of young boys.
As the undertaker showed off the medal he was awarded for return bodies from Afghanistan, his victims were nursing the mental scars left by 13 years of sex attacks.
The long-term effects of his evil deeds on one of the victims as “catastrophic”.
Brown had a significant risk of future reoffending and ordered him to be supervised for three years after his release.
Brown targeted the two boys at addresses in his home city of Perth between 1991 and 2004.
One of his victims was only seven when the abuse began while the other was 10.
He carried out sex acts on them and exposed them to pornography.
In 2006, as area manager for Dignity Caring Funeral Services, he was involved in bringing home to RAF Kinloss the bodies of 14 service personnel who died in the RAF Nimrod crash in Afghanistan.
In recognition, he and six colleagues became the first Scots to receive the Repatriation Medal during a ceremony in Perth.
The abuse allegations emerged last year. When confronted by one of the boys, Brown was accused of being a paedophile. He replied: “Yes, I suppose I am.”
The pervert sent an email to another victim claiming he couldn’t remember the abuse but apologised and said it was “vile and horrible and unthinkable”.
Brown is understood to have been removed as church organist at Craigie Parish Church in Perth when the allegations became public.
When he was interviewed by police, Brown told officers he would be inclined to believe what was being said about him.
He admitted two charges of indecent behaviour and two of indecent assault.
Brown had previous convictions for similar offences.
He would have faced a six-year prison term had it not been for his guilty pleas.
He was told at the High Court in Edinburgh: “No doubt you are aware that if you offend again during that
period you will be subject to recall to prison for the whole of the three-year period.”
Brown said that as a child he had been abused by a man and that he had also suffered abuse while in the Boys Brigade.
Advocate depute Richard Goddard told the court: “He could not say whether the abuse perpetrated against him had an impact on him in later life.”
Defence counsel Ronnie Renucci said: “He appreciates nothing can excuse his conduct. He accepts he has no one to blame but himself.
"He has a problem and he accepts that it is a problem that requires to be addressed. He does accept that ultimately it about sexual gratification.
“For that he is deeply ashamed and embarrassed.”
Brown was placed on the sex offenders’ register indefinitely.
|The End of Everything We Know! (2018-2019) VIDEO
|British govt caught up in Facebook data mining scandal VIDEO
|Trump affair exposures lead to the door of a lawyer Keith Davidson VIDEO
|'Too Russian': BBC accused of photoshopping Jeremy Corbyn’s hat in Soviet style VIDEO
|Two Teenagers Win Lawsuit against American Police Brutality VIDEO
|Eton groomed CEO of Cambridge Analytica: Undercover Secrets of Trump's Data Firm VIDEO
|UK freemasons disguised as cops are party to destroying mens livelihoods in STASI style blacklist
British establishment (masons) with the aid of British cops (masons) have been operating a STASI style blacklist of workers who dare challenge Health and Safety,
proper working conditions and union activity. Illegal use of police computers and workers private and personal data being passed
on to contractors to aid their blacklist vendetta.
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Met cops admits role in blacklisting construction workers
Scotland Yard has admitted Special Branch officers passed information to a controversial network that blacklisted construction workers.
It follows a six-year battle to find out if the Metropolitan Police supplied the intelligence on trade unionists.
The force says its investigation had "proven" the allegation, which will be investigated by a public inquiry.
Workers who say they were unfairly barred from jobs have already received millions of pounds in compensation.
In 2016, the union Unite reached a settlement with construction firms that resulted in 256 workers sharing more than £10m in compensation.
At the heart of the claims, which were made by hundreds of workers, was evidence that firms accessed a "blacklist" that logged workers' trade union activities.
The list was used by dozens of construction firms to vet those applying for work on building sites.
When the files were found to contain details of individual's political activities, the workers demanded that Scotland Yard disclose whether undercover police had colluded in supplying intelligence.
The Blacklisting affair
*The blacklisting scandal came to light in 2009 following a raid by the information commissioner's office on an organisation called the Consulting Association
*It uncovered a list of more than 3,000 workers - which in some instances also included details of personal relationships and their political activity as well as their trade union links on building sites
*Eight firms which used the list were sued by the workers: Carillion, Balfour Beatty, Costain, Kier, Laing O'Rourke, Sir Robert McAlpine, Skanska UK and Vinci
*The eight firms issued an unreserved apology for their part in the system
*It's thought that more than 700 workers shared £75m in settlement compensation - with many others having earlier settled for smaller amounts
Deputy Assistant Commissioner Richard Martin said the findings of the Metropolitan Police's internal investigation, completed two years ago, were so sensitive that they were sent directly to the then commissioner.
The letter states: "Allegation: Police, including Special Branches, supplied information that appeared on the Blacklist, funded by the country's major construction firms.
"The report concludes that, on the balance of probabilities, the allegation that the police or Special Branches supplied information is 'proven'.
"Material revealed a potentially improper flow of information from Special Branch to external organisations, which ultimately appeared on the blacklist."
Dave Smith, of the Blacklist Support Group, says a 36-page file on him - disclosed to him during the original investigation by the information commissioner - included details of his trade union work and information that appeared to have come from undercover monitoring of his political campaigning.
"When we first talked about police collusion in blacklisting, people thought we were conspiracy theorists," he said.
"We were told, things like that don't happen here. With this admission from the Met Police, our quest for the truth has been vindicated."
Evidence given to Parliament suggested that one undercover officer who infiltrated Mr Smith's union was Mark "Cassidy" Jenner, a member of Scotland Yard's now disbanded Special Demonstration Squad (SDS).
The SDS's activities are at the heart of the long-delayed public inquiry into alleged abuses by undercover police.
While Scotland Yard's letter says there is no evidence that SDS officers passed information to the blacklist network, a separate document published by the inquiry has revealed the existence of a unit called the "Industrial Intelligence Section".
In a statement, Scotland Yard said it had apologised for the delay in releasing the outcome of its blacklist the investigation.
"Allegations about police involvement with the 'Blacklist' will be fully explored during the Undercover Policing Public Inquiry," it said.
"At this stage the MPS will await the conclusions of the UCPI before considering what steps should be taken next."
|The royal parasites fighting over power grab
|Royal wedding invites going out to the peasantry NOT
The royals don't have friends they have an entourage of freemasons who are called on
any time they want to make it look like they are popular. Gaddafi used the same trick
and look how he ended up.
|Royal parasite fears son Charles would DAMAGE monarchy if he became King
|Scottish rag promotes Holyrood as some sort of force for good when it's NOT
|Murdoch rag's fake news on causes of cancer
|Murdoch rag paints May as allied with EU over spy attack despite Brexit
|Judicial mafia call for overhaul of marriage law saying it’s risible that men must pay ex-wives for life
In the same breath he wants to give cohabitees the same rights as a marriage contract. Never trust a judge or lawyer
interfering in marriage and relationships as its ONLY ever to line the legal mafia's bank accounts.
He was speaking to lawyers in Edinburgh home to the most vile and corrupt arm of Britain's legal mafia.
Scotland's law society and its lackeys have a long history of corruption and theft. If you have made NO
contract with anybody you have NO obligation no matter what these evil bastards claim.
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Many men sign
a marriage contract with NO detail or small print and only find out the repercussions when divorce
provides the outrageous and ridiculous responsibilities the legal system claims you owe to someone who
now acts like a total stranger. A total and utter corrupt con job making it the biggest swindle on planet .
* Sir James Munby called called for equality for divorcees paying maintenance
*He also argued co-habitees should have the same status as married couples
*The 69-year-old was accused of meddling in politics and told to quit early
Britain's most senior family judge called for an overhaul of marriage law yesterday, saying people would one day laugh at the idea that a man had to support his ex-wife for life.
Sir James Munby called for equality for divorcees when maintenance payments are settled by the courts, highlighting ‘absurd’ divorce settlements that are unfairly biased against men.
Sir James, who is president of the family division of the High Court, also said cohabitees should have the same status as married couples, and fault-free divorces should be introduced.
He said it had taken too long to rid the law of the Victorian notion that men were in charge in a marriage, and the law was marked by ‘hypocrisy and lack of intellectual honesty’.
Sweeping reforms were ‘necessary and inevitable’, he claimed, and the lack of a law governing the rights of couples who live together left women ‘condemned to injustice’.
But marriage campaigners said the head of the family courts was trying to abolish marriage.
Sir James, who is 69 and due to retire this summer, was also accused of meddling in politics and was urged to quit now.
In a speech to lawyers in Edinburgh, he referred to Victorian judges who regarded women as the weaker sex, adding: ‘Past judicial utterances we now find almost absurd should serve as a terrible warning of how history will, in due course, come to judge the present generation.’
Sir James said the changes of the Sixties, including the Pill, legalised abortion and the decriminalisation of homosexuality, had changed the world.
Family life has been transformed, he added, by the rise of multiculturalism and immigration, respect for same-sex unions, and IVF.
He said there had also been ‘a conscious rejection of marriage as an institution’.
Sir James added: ‘A vital concern of family law has to be to ensure the extension to transgendered people of the equal protection of the law.’
But lawyer Jill Kirby, the former head of the Centre for Policy Studies think-tank, said the reforms were ‘an agenda for the abolition of marriage’.
She added: ‘Sir James is saying anyone who supports marriage law is bigoted, intolerant and stuck in the past. He backs the usual politically correct ideas.
‘Cohabitees would be given the privileges of marriage without showing the commitment of married couples.
'He wants to remove fault from marriage break-up, which is unfair to a faithful partner. This is a highly political speech. He should step down.’
Harry Benson, of the Marriage Foundation think-tank, said: ‘Change in the law is the responsibility of Parliament, not judges.’
Sir James also called for family courts to be opened to public scrutiny and routine reporting ‘to rid ourselves of the relentless and damaging charge that we operate a system of private – some say secret – justice’.
Family courts deal with divorce, family break-up and child custody disputes, as well as cases in which children are taken from their parents, and those in which parents harm their children.
While some judgments are made public, judges can stop journalists reporting hearings.
|The royal parasite's charity scams
|Camila Cabello uses satanic horn sign on Ellen show VIDEO
|Zuckerberg: “I’m really sorry that this happened” VIDEO
|Facebook data machine: what it knows about you and how it uses that info VIDEO
|'Surveillance unit': Fallout of Facebook data scandal dissected VIDEO
|BBC disturbing employment rights undermined for their sick employees
|How Israel Rules The World Of Cyber Security, VICE on HBO VIDEO
|Cambridge Analytica Uncovered: Secret filming reveals election tricks VIDEO
|Cambridge Analytica have been secretly filmed saying they can entrap politicians in compromising situations
|NTSB to probe deadly crash involving UBER self-driving car VIDEO
Never trust a computer behind the wheel it's much worse than a drunk driver
|As we warned it hasn't taken long before the self drive deaths start
|TV presenter Ant has been going downhill since rubbing shoulders with the royal parasites
|Burrell trial exposes how the royal parasites interfere in court cases, AVOID appearing in HRH courts and
how the queen CANNOT be tried or prosecuted in the very courts she resides over
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Paul Burrell only one of the many homosexuals who work at the palace
Her gutter rags paint a picture that she ONLY rubber stamps Britain's judicial appointments
but throughout history the royals masonic lackeys have reigned over the peasantry using every dirty
murderous trick in the book to steal the family silver with total impunity and why SHE is the richest
despot on the planet by far.
Men have been and continue to lose their livelihoods and lives in HER dens of inquity where the QUEEN personally selects the
evil masonic judicial bastards who are stripping men bare to line the royals and their goffers pockets
Some interesting facts from today's Daily Rat exposures.
How Prince Charles dramatically tried to stop court case of Diana’s butler Paul Burrell that threatened to humiliate the Royals
Paul Burrell was accused of stealing 310 items together worth £4.5 million
The police discovered 2,000 negatives. Charles in the bath with his children, and many others showing the young princes naked.
Cops filled a lorry sent from London with 2,000 items that de Brunner judged had been illegally removed.
The princess,would never have given away such personal material, and certainly not in such quantities.
There can be few people in Britain unaware of the 2002 trial of Paul Burrell, which was dramatically halted after the Queen had a ‘recollection’.
Among the most serious disclosures are those relating to Prince Charles — and the attempts made on his behalf to try to stop the prosecution going ahead.
Although married himself, Burrell had so many gay affairs with guardsmen that Diana’s chef called him ‘Barrack-Room Bertha’.
Unaware of the scale of the alleged theft, and knowing that low-paid staff occasionally pilfered small items, Charles told his assistant private secretary Mark Bolland that Burrell probably did steal some things ‘because they all do’.
'The prince will say he gave the things to [the butler] and that Burrell’s actions were all right.’
During his second police interview Burrell was asked: ‘Did you tell anyone that you had the property?
‘No,’ he admitted, insisting that the items — including all Diana’s school reports — were gifts.
Burrell’s solicitor Andrew Shaw, for his part, appeared to think the case would never come to trial.
‘You’re making a terrible mistake,’ he told Maxine de Brunner. ‘They won’t let Burrell’s secrets be splashed
in the public domain. They’ll never let this come to trial.’ (HOW THEY CAN AVOID THEIR DIRTY LINEN BEING AIRED IN PUBLIC)
Fiona Shackleton,Charles’s divorce lawyer revealed that Paul Burrell had sent the prince a handwritten
letter in which he offered to return some of the items, provided Charles agreed not to support any prosecution.
The letter had been returned on her advice.
The CPS lawyer explained that the case could be closed only if Prince William and Diana’s sister Lady Sarah McCorquodale, who together inherited Diana’s property, signed statements to drop their complaints.
Shackleton’s view was that Charles could not be party to undermining the legal system. (WHICH HE TRIED TO DO ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS)
Agreeing to accept the return of some property in exchange for dropping the investigation, she said, would make it look as if Buckingham Palace were participating in a cover-up.
(SOMETHING THEY DO ALL THE TIME)
This, of course, would have been the ideal moment for the Queen to recall that she’d allowed the butler to take some of Diana’s possessions for safekeeping. But apparently she didn’t say a WORD.
Who knew what Burrell might say in the witness box? In effect, he was a time-bomb, having witnessed the prince’s secret meetings and phone calls with Camilla while he was married, and Diana’s many rendezvous with her boyfriends.
The police had now had time to watch six videos found in Burrell’s home, featuring Diana talking about the most intimate details of her relationship with the Royal Family, her sex life with Charles, and her affair with police protection officer Barry Mannakee.
What had happened, the police wondered, to the missing ten tapes? [Material from Settelen’s six recovered tapes was used in a Channel 4 documentary last year.]
And there was another tape that worried Charles. Kept in a box of Diana’s and now, he believed, in Burrell’s possession, it described the alleged HOMOSEXUAL rape of one member of his staff by another of his staff.
Burrell’s lawyers now issued a warning to Shackleton. If Burrell were prosecuted, they said, he would have to describe from the witness box not only details of Diana’s sex life, he might also read out quotes from letters in which Prince Philip had allegedly threatened her.
Burrell’s lawyers later explained that this was not a threat — the defence was seeking only to protect the Royal Family.
He wanted to let Charles know that he’d return all the property, but insisted on telling him so in person.
Throughout the 25-minute meeting, the spin-doctor had been appalled by Burrell’s ‘creepy manner’. The royals’ staff, he thought, were ‘a slimy, weird group with odd relationships’.
Later, he reported back to Charles that the butler wanted ‘a big hug and an offer of a job at Balmoral. He doesn’t want to be cast out’.
Instead, Charles was palpably shocked when the police told him 2,000 items had been seized at Burrell’s home.
It was the first time he’d heard the actual number.
‘He’s taken the lot!’ Charles exclaimed.
After listening to more evidence against the butler, Charles was asked if he supported a prosecution. ‘We’ve got no alternative,’ he sighed. Before leaving, the police asked Charles not to have any contact with Burrell.
The prince was now in a fix. Officially, he had to support the CPS’s charge that Burrell had stolen the items but privately, he still wanted the prosecution halted.
Another big sticking-point was that Diana’s sister and co-executor, Lady Sarah McCorquodale, was adamant that the butler should be brought to trial.
In an attempt to avert prosecution, Burrell’s lawyer handed the police a 39-page statement signed by his client.
Among other things, it described the butler’s close relationship with Diana — how he would smuggle her boyfriends into Kensington Palace, cancel public engagements so she could be with her lovers, and provide meals for the princess and her man of the moment.
Even the police could see that if Burrell gave detailed testimony about Diana’s sex life in court, the monarchy would be seriously harmed.
The lawyer then sent further warnings about Burrell’s intention to speak about events of ‘extreme delicacy’ and ‘matters of a very private nature’, and how his enjoyment of Diana’s ‘intimate’ trust would require ‘close examination’ at trial.
Again Charles did not reply. This provoked Burrell’s lawyer to threaten to summon the prince as a witness.
Burrell’s lawyer again approached the police, insisting that a message be passed on to Charles.
His client, he said, was offering to return all the royal items in his possession if the prosecution was dropped.
Charles ordered his new private secretary, Sir Michael Peat, to express his concern about continuing with the prosecution if it was a lost cause.
Both officers were disturbed by Peat’s performance. In his concern to protect Charles, he seemed to forget that Burrell had actually been charged with stealing property belonging to Diana’s executors, not the prince.
Or that any decisions about the prosecution now had to be taken by the Director of Public Prosecutions, who was sure he could prove Burrell’s guilt.
Peat summoned two of Diana’s executors to the palace — her sister Lady Sarah and the princess’s former private secretary, Michael Gibbins.
‘The police,’ Peat told them, ‘don’t have enough evidence to mount a successful prosecution and the case must be stopped. There is a risk of acquittal.’
He also spoke frankly about Charles’s fears that, among other things, Burrell would testify in detail about both Diana’s love life and her anger at the way she’d been treated by the Royal Family.
But it was no good. After two hours of discussion, he’d failed to persuade Charles’s sister-in-law to change her mind.
Paul Burrell, aged 44, stood in the dock of Court One at the Old Bailey, accused of stealing 310 items together worth £4.5 million.
The Queen had recalled a meeting five years earlier, soon after Diana’s death. Burrell had come to the palace to tell her about preserving some of the princess’s papers.
‘The Queen agreed that he should care for them,’ said Peat.
Only by questioning the Queen in court could Burrell’s version of the conversation be rebutted, and that was constitutionally impossible.
No reigning monarch could appear in ‘Her Majesty’s’ court. ‘That’s the end of the trial,’(THAT STATEMENT LAYS BARE THE ENORMITY OF BRITISH INJUSTICE THAT
CAN FLOW FROM ANY INDIVIDUAL ESPECIALLY THE RULING MONARCH BEING ABLE TO AVOID ANY FORM OF PROSECUTION)
According to palace rumours, however, Peat did tell Peter Goldsmith, the attorney general, that the recollection was a ‘golden opportunity to get rid of this embarrassment’.
To some in the prosecution and to police at the Old Bailey, the circumstances of the recollection described by Peat lacked credibility.
Inevitably, some of those involved in the case questioned whether the Queen had ever met Burrell in the ‘three-hour’ audience he had described in his statement of February 13, 2002.
The surprise was the timing of her revelation, coinciding as it did with Charles’s increasing despair — and the palace’s highly convenient interpretation of that meeting.
‘An act of genius,’ was the judgment of one Whitehall observer. ‘Only a golden bullet could have stopped the trial.’
Only two people could order the trial to end: the Director of Public Prosecutions, David Calvert-Smith; and the Attorney General, Lord (Peter) Goldsmith.
Now he was being asked to consider how to save the monarchy. His decision was that the trial should be brought to an end.
Crown Prosecutor Boyce announced in the courtroom that the trial was over. Charles and Peat breathed sighs of relief.
So did Burrell: ‘The Queen came through for me,’ he exclaimed. In the ensuing excitement, his brother, Graham, told a journalist: ‘He will have his revenge, but he will do it with dignity.’
With the trial in ruins, everyone was blamed except Charles.
Diana’s sister concluded: ‘They couldn’t afford for Paul Burrell to go into the witness box. Burrell had told the Prince of Wales that he would tell all unless the trial was halted.
Edmund Lawson, the QC commissioned by Michael Peat to investigate the allegation that Charles’s household had influenced the halting of the trial, said in his report that such an allegation did not stand up to scrutiny: there was simply no evidence to suggest there was any interference by Prince Charles ‘to procure the termination’ of the trial.
Nor was there any evidence to suggest that the Queen’s recollection had been made in order to derail the trial.
‘Let’s nick Peat for seeking to pervert the course of justice,’
The scandal, had the prince’s private secretary been formally cautioned and interviewed, would have been immense. But nothing happened.
That left the most important mystery — the Queen’s recollection.
And Charles? In the polls, his popularity fell back to the dismal level last seen in the days after Diana’s death.
|ISRAEL'S SECRET WEAPON - THE TALPIOT PROGRAM VIDEO
|'Skripal case is a carefully-constructed drama' - John Pilger VIDEO
|Desmond's tacky little porn rag upset at raunchy royal drama
The hypocritical purveyor of porn has the cheek to accuse
others of what
his tacky little porn rag puts out.
|Gutter press gangsters fucking with the sheeple
|May I tell a pack of lies AGAIN? VIDEO
|Moscow expels 23 UK diplomats and shuts British Council in retaliation as spy row deepens VIDEO
|Responsible sources: YouTube plans to use Wikipedia to fight against misinformation VIDEO
|Barclay Brothers rag portrays May like Mother Theresa during spy poisoning
|Another gun totting moll to add to the royal mafia's vast arsenal
After Dunblane the establishment had the excuse to disarm the peasants but NOT themselves
|Even the Daily Rat finally has to expose the royal parasites
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Though still showing sympathy for the queen. 'Why is Prince Charles so extraordinarily self-indulgent?
Why can’t he be more like his mother, who lives without complaint under leaky roofs and in rooms that haven’t
been repainted since her Coronation?'
'Nobody knows what utter hell it is to be Prince of Wales,’ Charles said in November 2004. His idea of hell, it must be said, is unlikely to be shared by most of his future subjects.
Take, for example, accounts of what it is like to have Prince Charles come to stay for the weekend.
Before a visit to one friend in North-East England, he sent his staff ahead a day early with a truck carrying furniture to replace the perfectly appropriate fittings in the guest rooms.
And not just the odd chest of drawers: the truck contained nothing less than Charles and Camilla’s complete bedrooms, including the Prince’s orthopaedic bed, along with his own linen.
His staff had also made sure to pack a small radio, Charles’s own lavatory seat, rolls of Kleenex Premium Comfort lavatory paper, Laphroaig whisky and bottled water (for both bedrooms), plus two landscapes of the Scottish Highlands.
The next delivery to arrive was his food — organic, of course. His hosts decided, despite their enjoyment of his company, not to invite him again.
Their experience was less distressing, however, than that of the family asked to host Charles for a long weekend on the Welsh borders.
Over the preceding months, they’d invited many friends for the four meals at which he’d preside; they’d also hired staff and ordered in masses of food and flowers.
But on the Friday afternoon of Charles’s expected arrival, there was a call from St James’s Palace to offer regrets. Under pressure of business, the Prince could not arrive until Saturday morning.
The following day, the same official telephoned to offer regrets for Saturday lunch, but gave the assurance that Charles would arrive for dinner. Then, that afternoon, the whole visit was cancelled due to ‘unforeseen circumstances’.
The considerable waste and disappointment were not mitigated when Charles later revealed to his stricken hostess the reason for his cancellation. He had felt unable to abandon the beauty of his sunlit garden at Highgrove, he said.
For about six months of every year, the heir to the throne enjoyed a unique lifestyle in beautiful places, either in seclusion or with friends.
Although his travelling staff (a butler, two valets, chef, private secretary, typist and bodyguards) could anticipate most of his movements between his six homes, the only definite confirmation of his final destination, especially to his hosts, would be the arrival of a truck carrying suitcases, furniture and food.
There then followed endless telephone calls with his staff as he changed his mind about his future plans and projects.
For four months every year he lived in Scotland, where he expected people to visit him from London, usually at their own expense.
Sometimes, he travelled abroad. After the death of the Queen Mother in March 2002, for instance, he flew to Greece to stay for three days on his own in a monastery on Mount Athos.
Unfortunately, someone took a photograph that showed the Prince stepping off a boat with a butler and a remarkable amount of luggage in tow — certainly far more than anyone could need for a few days’ meditation.
The image didn’t exactly chime with the theme of the imminent Jubilee celebrations: to emphasise the monarchy’s relevance in modern Britain. Charles’s staff could see this, even if he couldn’t.Julia Cleverdon, an executive on one of his charities, stuck the photo on her office wall and wrote, with risky irony: ‘We’re off to Mt Athos with 43 pieces of luggage.’
The Prince’s other free weeks were likely to be divided between well-off friends. At Chatsworth, the 175-room home of his beloved Debo Mitford, the Duchess of Devonshire, Charles and Camilla would be assigned a whole wing for up to three weeks.
During the shooting season, the Prince opted for the company of Gerald Grosvenor, the Duke of Westminster, at either Eaton Hall, near Chester, or at the Duke’s shooting lodge in the Forest of Bowland in Lancashire.
In between, he stayed at Garrowby, the home of the Earl and Countess of Halifax in Yorkshire, and with Chips and Sarah Keswick in Invermark, Scotland.
Even his personal policeman was roped in to cater to his comfort. If the Prince had to attend a function, the policeman would arrive with a flask containing a pre-mixed Martini. This would then be handed over to the host’s butler along with a special glass that Charles insisted on using.
And if he was expected to sit for a meal, the host would be informed in advance that an aide would be delivering a bag containing the Prince’s food. This was in complete contrast with the Queen, who always ate what everyone else was having.
None of this petulant behaviour would be on show, however, when Charles emerged in public. On those occasions, he’d show what appeared to be genuine interest in people and events.
Few outsiders could guess, commented one adviser, whether or not he was ‘just putting on a game face’.
Sir Christopher Airy, who became his private secretary in 1990, was once reprimanded for suggesting to Charles that a forthcoming visit was ‘your duty’. The Prince shouted at him: ‘Duty is what I live — an intolerable burden.’
At home, his demands were constant, which meant an assistant had to be on call in Charles’s office until he went to sleep.
All his aides were subject to familiar daily tirades. ‘Even my office is not the right temperature,’ he’d moan. ‘Why do I have to put up with this? It makes my life so unbearable.’
Sir John Riddell, his private secretary for five years from 1985, once told a colleague that Charles was better suited to being a second-hand car salesman than a royal prince.
‘Every time I made the office work,’ Riddell observed, ‘the Prince f***ed it up again.
‘He comes in, complains that his office is “useless” and people cannot spell and the world is so unfair, then says: “This is part of the intolerable burden I put up with. This incompetence!” ’
When Charles entertained at home, everything was geared to his own habits and convenience. Dinner would be served to guests at 8pm, but he wouldn’t arrive until 8.15pm, because he’d decided against eating a first course.
It was fine, therefore, for dinner guests to start without him. Not at breakfast, though: visitors to Highgrove were cautioned by Camilla not to begin eating before the Prince appeared.
He was also unusually particular about his gardens at Highgrove. Because he refused to use pesticides, he employed four gardeners who would lie, nose-down, on a trailer pulled by a slow-moving Land Rover to pluck out weeds.
In addition, retired Indian servicemen were deployed to prowl through the undergrowth at night with torches and handpick slugs from the leaves of plants.
Charles also gave rein to extravagance in his office, where he employed an individual private secretary for each of his interests — including the charities, architecture, complementary medicine and the environment.
And anyone visiting the office at St James’s Palace would be escorted to it by no fewer than three footmen, each responsible for a short segment of corridor.
A weekend with the Prince at Sandringham, meanwhile, can be a decidedly odd experience. One group of writers and journalists, invited five years ago, arrived to find that each of them had been assigned a servant.
Friday after dinner was listed as a cinema night. The chosen film was Robert Altman’s Gosford Park, depicting upstairs/downstairs life to an audience surrounded by the reality of that social order. The film became a regular feature of Charles’s culture weekends.
Michael Fawcett, the Prince’s former valet and fixer, supervised the placing of chairs in front of a screen in the ballroom. In the front row were two throne-like armchairs for Charles and Camilla.
Soon everyone was seated, and servants entered with silver platters of ice cream. The film started. Charles and Camilla instantly fell asleep, and the ice cream slowly melted away.
On Saturday, the guests took a walk with Charles, during which he spoke about his belief in a sustainable environment. They were careful to avoid debate: their host, they had been cautioned, was easily offended.
‘People think I’m bonkers, crackers,’ Charles groaned suddenly, in the middle of a field. ‘Do you think I’m mad?’ he asked, in a manner that forbade a positive reply.
The two-hour walk ended back at the house, where the guests were served tea.
‘Right, we’re off,’ Charles announced, striding out of the house after a quick cup. Jumping into his Aston Martin, he drove at breakneck speed down narrow, twisting lanes, reassured that police motorcyclists had cleared other traffic.
His guests followed in a fleet of gleaming Land Rovers, arriving at Charles’s local church in time to hear a short concert.
On Sunday, female guests had been instructed to wear appropriate hats and gloves for a trip to the local Anglican church, St Mary the Virgin and St Mary Magdalen. The two who chose to go to mass at a nearby Roman Catholic church felt Charles’s displeasure.
By Sunday dinner, some of the guests had become puzzled about their host. His habit of commandeering a small bowl of olive oil just for himself provoked one visitor to recount a story of Charles during a recent trip to India.
The Prince had invited the banking heir Lord billionaires be rounded up to accompany him. During the tour, a sumptuous lunch was held in a maharaja’s palace.
Unexpectedly, a loaf of Italian bread was placed on the table. As an American billionaire reached out to take a piece, Charles shouted: ‘No, that’s mine! Only for me!’
In reply to that story, another visitor recalled that on a previous weekend at Sandringham, a guest had brought Charles a truffle as a gift. To everyone’s envy, Charles did not share the delicacy at dinner but kept it to himself.
Those who know him have often asked themselves why Prince Charles is so extraordinarily self-indulgent
At the end of the Sandringham weekend — the guests were asked not to leave until the Monday morning — some were told to leave £150 in cash for the staff, or to visit the estate’s souvenir shop.
Most would tell their friends that Charles seemed genuine, but that the weekend was surreal.
Those who know him have often asked themselves why Prince Charles is so extraordinarily self-indulgent. Why can’t he be more like his mother, who lives without complaint under leaky roofs and in rooms that haven’t been repainted since her Coronation?
In 2006, for instance, Charles used the royal train simply to travel to Penrith to visit a pub — at a cost of £18,916 — as part of his ‘pub in the hub’ initiative to revitalise village life.
And he spent £20,980 for a day trip by plane from Scotland to Lincolnshire to watch William receive his RAF wings.
By contrast, the Queen travelled by train — courtesy of First Capital Connect — to Sandringham at Christmas. Her ticket cost £50, instead of the £15,000 her journey would have cost by the royal train.
Some have speculated that Charles’s extravagance is a kind of revenge on the Duke of Edinburgh, for sending him to Gordonstoun in Scotland during his formative years. The Prince loathed the school’s Spartan regime, but his father insisted he stay there to complete his secondary education.
The other mystery is why Charles has never seemed to appreciate his great good fortune. Instead, he has given vent so frequently to resentment that one friend has dubbed him ‘an Olympian whinger’.
With a personal income of millions from the Duchy of Cornwall (£16.3 million in 2007 alone) he could afford to indulge his slightest whim — yet even that didn’t satisfy him.
One evening, the Prince was particularly maudlin at a dinner hosted by a billionaire in Klosters, Switzerland, for a number of the super-rich. When they’d finished eating, Charles huddled in a corner with King Constantine of Greece. ‘We pulled the short straw,’ sighed the Prince.
Compared with others in the room, he complained, both he and the King were stuck for cash. In his case, he explained, the Duchy of Cornwall administrators would repeatedly tell him what he couldn’t afford to do.
In fact, Charles doesn’t have to answer to anyone over his use of the duchy’s income.
At the time of his complaint, among his 124 staff — most of them paid for by taxpayers — were four valets.
Why four for one man? So that two would always be available to help him change his clothes, which he did up to five times every day.
It could be argued that it is his association with billionaires that has made Charles so dissatisfied with his lot. During a recent after-dinner speech at Waddesdon Manor, Lord Rothschild’s Buckinghamshire home, Charles complained that his host employed more gardeners than himself — 15 against his nine.
Fortunately, the public were unaware of such gripes. His staff, however, began to realise that his extravagance was threatening to undermine his public image.
To counter this, Michael Fawcett told a charity donor: ‘His Royal Highness lives modestly. He hasn’t got a yacht and doesn’t eat lunch.’
This had the benefit of being partly true: Charles has never bought a yacht and prefers not to eat lunch — though he could easily afford both.
More worryingly, the Prince’s then private secretary Sir Michael Peat decided to brief a journalist that ‘Charles does not enjoy a champagne and caviar lifestyle’.
Contrary to the public’s perception, he continued, the Prince possessed only one car, and did not even own his own home.
In reality, Charles had access to a fleet of at least six cars, including two Aston Martins, a Bentley, an Audi, a Range Rover and a Land Rover.
And Peat’s quibble about the legal ownership of the six homes variously occupied by the Prince (Clarence House, Highgrove, Birkhall, the Castle of Mey, Balmoral and Sandringham) was clearly disingenuous.
Among other things Peat failed to mention was that when Charles moved into Clarence House, in 2003, the cost of refurbishment had soared from £3 million towards £6 million — all funded by the taxpayer.
Or that the 15-bedroom Castle of Mey, had been rebuilt with the help of a £1 million gift from Julia Kauffman, a Canadian-born heiress living in Kansas City.
Foreign Office officials, however, were well aware of the Prince’s tendency to demand the best of everything, without dipping into his own pocket.
Indeed, relations with the heir to the throne became increasingly strained as he continued to insist on travelling on private planes, especially to the Continent.
After one particularly nasty spat, Charles reluctantly agreed to fly commercial in Europe. But on his return, he refused ever again to take a BA plane.
‘He wanted the convenience — and not to mix with hoi polloi,’ observed one mandarin dryly.
REBEL Prince: The Power, Passion and Defiance of Prince Charles by Tom Bower, published by William Collins on Thursday at £20.
|EXPOSING THE NEW WORLD ORDER
EXPOSING CORRUPT GOVERNMENTS WHILE DEMANDING LEGAL,JUDICIAL AND POLITICAL REFORM TO ENSURE
PROPER ACCOUNTABLE DEMOCRACIES. A GROWING
RESISTANCE TO THE SATANIC CONTROL OF THE WORLD BY THE ILLUMINATI, SKULL AND BONES, MASONS, BILDERBERGS, SPECULATIVE SOCIETY,KNIGHTS TEMPLAR AND ALL OTHER SECRET SOCIETIES ACTING
AS SHADOW GOVERNMENTS FOR WESTERN SO CALLED DEMOCRACIES.
THE NEW WORLD ORDER MOBSTERS WILL NOT GET AWAY
WITH THEIR PLANS TO ENSLAVE GOOD MEN WITH THEIR EVIL SATANIC NETWORK OF CONTROL,
A WORLDWIDE ZIONIST CABAL AND EVERY SINGLE PROMOTER OF ITS EVIL EMPIRE.
MASONIC RUN COMPANIES PROMOTING HIGH TECH STATE MONITORING SYSTEMS THEY ARE TRYING
TO FORCE ON ALL FREE MEN.
The majority of the mass media has a hidden agenda and none of it
includes fair reporting of men's issues.
Please send comments and articles to EDITORIAL.
World NEWS the government and judicial controlled mass media wont EXPOSE.
|LATEST GLOBAL NEWS UPDATE
ABOUT US JOIN
TERRORISM IS SOCIAL ENGINEERING ON A GLOBAL SCALE